Hyperfractionated Versus Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy in Standard Risk Medulloblastoma (PNET4) (SIOP-PNET-4)

September 12, 2025 updated by: Institut Curie

A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial of Hyperfractionated Versus Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy in Standard Risk Medulloblastoma

This is an international prospective randomised trial, which will compare two radiotherapy regimens in children and adolescents (aged 4 or 5 years to 21 years inclusive) with carefully staged 'standard risk' medulloblastoma.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients eligible for the study will be those with non-metastatic medulloblastoma (by imaging and CSF cytology) at diagnosis. Patients randomised to the standard arm will receive conventionally fractionated (once a day) radiotherapy with a dose of 54 Gy to the posterior fossa and 23.4 Gy to the craniospinal axis. The experimental arm will be hyperfractionated (twice a day) radiotherapy (1 Gy b.d.) with a dose of 60 Gy to the posterior fossa with an additional 8 Gy to the tumour bed and 36 Gy to the craniospinal axis. Both groups will receive identical chemotherapy consisting of eight weekly doses of Vincristine given with radiotherapy and 8 courses of CCNU, cisplatin and vincristine following radiotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75005
        • Institut Curie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age at diagnosis at least 4 years or 5 years (according to the policy of the National Brain Tumour Group) and less than 22 years.
  • Histologically proven medulloblastoma, including the following variants(WHO classification - 2000): classic medulloblastoma, nodular / desmoplastic medulloblastoma, melanotic medulloblastoma, medullomyoblastoma No CNS metastasis on MRI - supratentorial, arachnoid of the posterior fossa or spine.
  • No clinical evidence of extra-CNS metastasis
  • No tumour cells on the cytospin of lumbar CSF. Central Review of CSF cytology is recommended but not mandatory. It will be left to national policy.
  • Radiotherapy to start no more than 40 days after surgery.
  • Ability to receive twice daily radiotherapy.
  • Vital functions within normal range for their age group.
  • CTC grades < 2 for liver, renal, haematological and audiological function.
  • No medical contraindication to radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
  • Written informed consent (and patient assent where appropriate) according to the laws of each participating country. Written informed consent should also be sought for biological studies.
  • National and local ethical committee approval according to the laws of each participating country (to include approval for biological studies).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • One of the inclusion criteria is lacking.
  • Brainstem or supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumour.
  • Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumour.
  • Medulloepithelioma.
  • Ependymoblastoma.
  • Large cell médulloblastoma.
  • Metastatic medulloblastoma (on CNS MRI and/or positive cytospin of postoperative lumbar CSF).
  • Patient previously treated for a brain tumour or any type of malignant disease.
  • Patients who are pregnant.
  • Females who are sexually active and not taking reliable contraception.
  • Known predisposition to medulloblastoma e.g. Gorlin's syndrome.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Fractionation Regimen

1.8 Gy daily, 5 fractions per week

Cranio-spinal axis:

23.4 Gy in 13 fractions of 1.8 Gy

Posterior fossa:

30.6 Gy in 17 fractions of 1.8 Gy

1.8 Gy daily, 5 fractions per week

Cranio-spinal axis:

23.4 Gy in 13 fractions of 1.8 Gy

Posterior fossa:

30.6 Gy in 17 fractions of 1.8 Gy

Experimental: Hyperfractionated radiotherapy

1 Gy b.d. (minimum interval between fractions 8 hours). 10 fractions per week

Craniospinal axis:

36 Gy in 36 fractions of 1 Gy

Posterior fossa:

24 Gy in 24 fractions of 1 Gy

Tumour Bed:

8 Gy in 8 fractions of 1 Gy

1 Gy b.d. (minimum interval between fractions 8 hours). 10 fractions per week

Craniospinal axis:

36 Gy in 36 fractions of 1 Gy

Posterior fossa:

24 Gy in 24 fractions of 1 Gy

Tumour Bed:

8 Gy in 8 fractions of 1 Gy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Free survival rate
Time Frame: 2 years after the start of the study
To compare in a randomised trial the event free survival rate for children and adolescents with standard risk medulloblastoma treated with either hyperfractionated radiotherapy or reduced dose radiotherapy with conventional fractionation.
2 years after the start of the study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare overall survival between the two treatment arms.
Time Frame: Follow-up of the last patient included up to the age of 20 years
Will hyperfractionated radiotherapy lead to a different progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to the standard arm radiotherapy?
Follow-up of the last patient included up to the age of 20 years
To compare the pattern of relapse between the two treatment arms
Time Frame: Follow-up of the last patient included up to the age of 20 years
Will hyperfractionated RT lead to a different pattern of local tumour control/pattern of relapse with particular respect to local relapse (tumour bed, posterior fossa outside the tumour bed) compared to the standard arm RT? The time to local progression should be the measure for the local tumour control.
Follow-up of the last patient included up to the age of 20 years
To explore the benefit and the risks of neurosurgery
Time Frame: Follow-up of the last patient included up to the age of 20 years

To determine the toxicity of surgery.To investigate whether there are identifiable factors that correlate with toxicity.

To define the impact of any complications of surgery on commencement of adjuvant therapy and on EFS.

Follow-up of the last patient included up to the age of 20 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: DOZ François, MD, Institut Curie

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2011

First Posted (Estimated)

May 11, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Sponsor will share de-identified data sets. Documents generated under the project will be disseminated in accordance with Institut Curie policies.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data requests can be submitted starting 9 months after last article publication and will be made accessible for up to 12 months.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to trial individual participant data can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a data sharing agreement (DSA).

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medulloblastoma

Clinical Trials on Standard Fractionation Regimen

Subscribe