Safety and Efficacy Study of PEA and Polydatin on Intestinal Inflammation and Visceral Hyperalgesia in IBS Patients (CMD-IBS09(2))

June 16, 2012 updated by: MARIA CRISTINA COMELLI

Effect of the Oral Administration in IBS Patients of the Association of 200 mg Micronised Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) and 20 mg Polydatin, on Parameters of Intestinal Inflammation and Visceral Hyperalgesia.

Despite the pathophysiology of IBS remains largely unsettled, several mechanisms have been proposed to explain symptom generation. These include psychosocial factors, altered gastrointestinal motor function and altered perception of visceral stimuli because of chronic low-grade inflammation and increased nociceptive mediator release by inflammatory cells, particularly mast cells.

The aim of this pilot study is to provide evidence of:

  1. intestinal mast cell (MC) infiltration and activation in IBS patients;
  2. down-modulation of MC activation by the oral administration of the association of palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) and polydatin in IBS patients.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

The number of inflammatory cells in the gut wall of IBS patients is increased in comparison to asymptomatic controls. A significant increase in the number of both mast cells and T-lymphocytes in the mucosa of IBS patients have been reported. Electron microscopic studies demonstrated that mast cells were more frequently degranulated in IBS, suggesting their increased state of activation. Accordingly, an increased mucosal release of preformed mediators, such as histamine and tryptase, as well as de novo synthesis and secretion of arachidonic acid end products (e.g. prostaglandin E2) have been demonstrated. These mediators are known to target sensory nerve pathways, including those innervating the gastrointestinal tract, leading to visceral hyperalgesia.

Electron microscopic studies showed that the mean distance between inflammatory cells and enteric nerves is significantly reduced in IBS patients, thus providing a conceptual basis for a putative pathogenetic role of low-grade inflammation on sensory-motor dysfunction in IBS. Activated mast cells in close proximity to mucosal colonic innervation correlated with the frequency and severity of abdominal pain. Evidence that mast cell mediators of IBS patients, but not controls, evoked activation of nociceptive sensory afferent neurons are available, thus providing a possible mechanism through which mast cells can evoke pain in IBS patients. Similar results has been recently reported following the administration into the rat colon of supernatants collected from human IBS colonic biopsy samples in culture. This nociceptive effect on murine sensory neurons was inhibited by serine protease inhibitors and a Protease Activating Receptor-2 antagonist.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • IBS patients (both males and females) with positive diagnosis based on Rome III criteria (all IBS subtypes will be included)
  • Age in the range 18-70 years
  • Subjects capable of conforming to the study protocol
  • Subjects who have given their free and informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any relevant organic, systemic or metabolic disease, such as celiac disease, IDDM (Insulin-Dependant Diabetes Mellitus), Insulin-Independent Diabetes Mellitus, metabolic syndrome, pelvic organ prolapse, and urinary incontinence.
  • Subjects with ascertained intestinal organic diseases (ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, microscopic colitis, infectious colitis, ischemic colitis, complicated diverticular disease).
  • Subjects with untreated food intolerance, i.e. remaining symptomatic despite the withdrawal of the suspected food
  • Previous major abdominal surgeries
  • Females of childbearing potential, in the absence of effective contraceptive methods
  • Subjects who become unable to conform to protocol
  • Subjects who are continuously taking contact laxatives
  • Subjects who have been continuously administered glucocorticoids, anti-histaminergic and mast cell stabilizer drugs within the previous 30 days
  • Subjects who have been continuously administered trimebutine within the previous 30 days
  • Treatment with any investigational drug within the previous 30 days
  • Recent history or suspicion of alcohol abuse or drug addiction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Recoclix (CM&D Pharma Limited)
Recoclix: two tablets per day for 12 weeks
tablets; 200 mg PEA+20 mg polydatin; 2 tablets/day; 12 weeks
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
IBS patients
tablets, 2tablets/day, 12 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes from screening visit of mast cell infiltration and activation in biopsy samples of colon mucosa from IBS patients, following 12 weeks of dietary supplementation with palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) and polydatin
Time Frame: screening visit and after 12 weeks

Comparison between healthy volunteers and IBS patients (screening visit) on the following parameters:

  • number of infiltrating mast cells (ICH)
  • mast cell activation, as per histamine and tryptase release in the surnatant of cultured colon biopsy samples

Comparison between active and placebo supplemented IBS patients (after 12 weeks from randomization) on the following parameters:

  • number of infiltrating mast cells (ICH)
  • mast cell activation, as per histamine and tryptase release in the surnatant of cultured colon biopsy samples
screening visit and after 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in biomarkers related to the endocannabinoid system
Time Frame: 12 weeks after randomization
Comparison between active and placebo supplemented IBS patients (after 12 weeks from randomization) on the level of anandamide, 2-AG, PEA, CB1, CB2, FAAH (LC-APCI-MS; immunoblotting)
12 weeks after randomization
Changes from screening visit of other inflammatory cell subsets in biopsy samples of colon mucosa from IBS patients, following 12 weeks of dietary supplementation with palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) and polydatin
Time Frame: screening visit and after 12 weeks
Comparison between active and placebo supplemented IBS patients (after 12 weeks from randomization) of the number of other inflammatory cell subsets (ICH)
screening visit and after 12 weeks
Safety assessment by no changes in laboratory parameters and vital signs
Time Frame: 4, 8, 12 weeks after randomization
  • Laboratory test (blood cell count, AST, ALT, creatinine, gamma-GT, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, glucose, N, Na, K, Ca)
  • Physical examination and vital signs (systolyc and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate)
4, 8, 12 weeks after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

June 10, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 19, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2012

Last Verified

June 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Irritable Bowel Syndrome

3
Subscribe