Qvar Versus Clenil, a General Practice Research Database Study

October 29, 2012 updated by: David Price, Research in Real-Life Ltd

HFA Beclomethasone in Asthma, a General Practice Research Database Study: Real-life Observational Evaluation of Extra-fine With Standard Particle Size Beclometasone Dipropionate Using the Propellant Hydrofluoroalkane 134a for the Management of Asthma in a Representative UK Primary Care Population

This study will compare the absolute and relative effectiveness of asthma management in patients on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) maintenance therapy as either extra-fine-particle or larger-particle formulation beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) via metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) using the propellant hydrofluoroalkane propellant (HFA-BDP), namely Qvar® MDI compared with Clenil® MDI.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Current asthma guidelines in the UK are underpinned by evidence derived from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Although RCT data are considered the gold standard, patients recruited to asthma RCTs are estimated to represent less than 10% of the UK's asthma population. The poor representation of the asthma population is due to a number of factors, such as tightly-controlled inclusion criteria for RCTs. There is, therefore, a need for more representative RCTs and real-life observational studies to inform existing guidelines and help optimise asthma outcomes.

In response to the Montreal Protocol's ruling to phase out ozone-depleting chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants in asthma inhalers, several hydrofluoroalkane-134a-propellant (HFA-) formulations of BDP have been developed. Two branded generic formulations currently available in the UK are Qvar® (Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd) - an extra-fine-particle (~1.1 microns) HFA-BDP (solution) formulation and Clenil® (Chiesi Limited) - a larger particle (~2.9 microns) HFA-BDP (suspension) formulation.

The extra-fine particle formulation HFA-BDP formulation (Qvar®) has been shown to improve total and small airway deposition relative to CFC-BDP. As a result of the more even distribution through both the large and small airways of the lungs and data from short-term randomised clinical trials (RCTs), Qvar® dosing is recommended at approximately one half the dose of traditional CFC-BDP (average particle size ~3.5 microns). However, the larger-particle Clenil® is recommended for prescribing at the same dose as traditional CFC-BDP.

Further studies are required to understand whether the differences in particle size and airway distribution have an impact on asthma outcomes over the long-term.

This observational study will investigate the real-world effectiveness of extra-fine HFA-BDP (Qvar®) as compared with larger-particle HFA-BDP (Clenil®) in patients with asthma who: were new to ICS therapy; received an increase in their ICS dose, or switched / changed baseline ICS therapy to HFA-BDP with no change in BDP-equivalent ICS dose. We hypothesise that differences in effectiveness might become apparent over the longer term through a retrospective database analysis of one-year outcomes for the diverse patient population seen in primary care.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

56985

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Norfolk
      • Cawston, Norfolk, United Kingdom, NR10 4FE
        • Research in Real Life Ltd

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients are aged between 4-80 years and have evidence of asthma and subsequent therapy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged: 4-80 years
  • Paediatric cohort (aged 4-11 years), and
  • Adult cohort (aged 12-80 years )
  • Evidence of asthma and current asthma therapy:
  • All cohorts (IPDI, IPDS, IPDA):

    • a diagnostic code for asthma, and / or *≥2 prescriptions for asthma at different points in time during the prior year and/or IPDI only: ≥2 prescriptions for asthma therapies during the outcome year, including ≥1 ICS prescription in addition to that received at IPD

IPDA and IPDS only:

  • 1 ICS prescription in the baseline year, and
  • 1 other asthma prescription during the baseline year.

    *Evidence of "current therapy":

  • 2 prescription for ICS during the outcome year (i.e. ≥1 prescription in addition to the prescription at index date

    • Have at least one year of up-to-standard (UTS) baseline data (prior to the IPD) and at least one year of UTS outcome data (following the IPD).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Had a COPD read code at any time; and/or
  • Had any chronic respiratory disease, except asthma, at any time; and/or
  • Patients on maintenance oral steroids during baseline year
  • Received a combination inhaler in addition to a separate ICS inhaler in the baseline year; and/or
  • Received ICS therapy during baseline year via DPI (IPDA and IPDS cohorts only).
  • If they received multiple ICS prescriptions on the same day at IPD or immediately before

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
IPDI EF HFA-BDP
Patients initiating inhaled corticosteroid therapy as extra-fine HFA-BDP MDI at the index date
IPDI cohort intervention = initiation of intervention drug; IPDS cohort intervention = switching from baseline inhaled corticosteroid therapy to intervention drug without a change in baseline inhaled corticosteroid dose; IPDA cohort intervention = increase in baseline inhaled corticosteroid drug as intervention drug
Other Names:
  • Qvar
IPDI SP HFA-BDP
Patients initiating inhaled corticosteroid therapy as standard particle HFA-BDP MDI at the index date
IPDI cohort intervention = initiation of intervention drug; IPDS cohort intervention = switching from baseline inhaled corticosteroid therapy to intervention drug without a change in baseline inhaled corticosteroid dose; IPDA cohort intervention = increase in baseline inhaled corticosteroid drug as intervention drug
Other Names:
  • Fostair
IPDA SP HFA-BDP
Patients increased inhaled corticosteroid therapy as standard particle HFA-BDP MDI at the index date
IPDI cohort intervention = initiation of intervention drug; IPDS cohort intervention = switching from baseline inhaled corticosteroid therapy to intervention drug without a change in baseline inhaled corticosteroid dose; IPDA cohort intervention = increase in baseline inhaled corticosteroid drug as intervention drug
Other Names:
  • Fostair
IPDA EF HFA-BDP
Patients increased inhaled corticosteroid therapy as extra fine particle HFA-BDP MDI at the index date
IPDI cohort intervention = initiation of intervention drug; IPDS cohort intervention = switching from baseline inhaled corticosteroid therapy to intervention drug without a change in baseline inhaled corticosteroid dose; IPDA cohort intervention = increase in baseline inhaled corticosteroid drug as intervention drug
Other Names:
  • Qvar
IPDS SP HFA-BDP
Patients increased inhaled corticosteroid therapy as standard particle HFA-BDP MDI at the index date
IPDI cohort intervention = initiation of intervention drug; IPDS cohort intervention = switching from baseline inhaled corticosteroid therapy to intervention drug without a change in baseline inhaled corticosteroid dose; IPDA cohort intervention = increase in baseline inhaled corticosteroid drug as intervention drug
Other Names:
  • Fostair
IPDS EF HFA-BDP
Patients increased inhaled corticosteroid therapy as extrafine particle HFA-BDP MDI at the index date
IPDI cohort intervention = initiation of intervention drug; IPDS cohort intervention = switching from baseline inhaled corticosteroid therapy to intervention drug without a change in baseline inhaled corticosteroid dose; IPDA cohort intervention = increase in baseline inhaled corticosteroid drug as intervention drug
Other Names:
  • Qvar

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severe asthma exacerbation (ATS/ERS based defn)
Time Frame: 1 year

Exacerbation defined as:

(i) Respiratory-related:

  1. Hospital attendance / admissions OR
  2. A&E attendance OR (ii) Use of acute oral steroids**
1 year
Primary composite asthma control
Time Frame: 1 year

Where control is defined as absence of:

(i) Respiratory-related:

  1. Hospital attendance or admission
  2. A&E attendance, OR
  3. Out of hours attendance, OR
  4. Out-patient department attendance (ii) GP consultations for lower respiratory tract infection (iii) Prescriptions for acute courses of oral steroids
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exacerbation definition based on clinical experience
Time Frame: 1 year

Defined as:

(i) Respiratory-related:

  1. Hospital attendance / admissions OR
  2. A&E attendance OR
  3. Out of hours consultation OR
  4. GP consultation OR (ii) Use of acute oral steroids
1 year
Asthma control + SABA usage
Time Frame: 1 year

Where control requires the absence of:

(i) Respiratory-related:

  1. Hospital attendance or admission
  2. A&E attendance, OR
  3. Out of hours consultation, OR
  4. Out-patient department attendance (ii) GP consultations for lower respiratory tract infection (iii) Prescriptions for acute courses of oral steroids (iv) Average daily prescribed dose of ≤200mcg salubtamol / ≤500mcg terbutaline
1 year
Treatment success
Time Frame: 1 year

(i) Control

a. No respiratory-related: i. Hospital attendance or admission ii. A&E attendance, OR iii. Out of hours consultation, OR iv. Out-patient department attendance b. No GP consultations for lower respiratory tract infection (ii) No prescriptions for acute courses of oral steroids (iii) No additional or change in therapy

  1. Increased dose of ICS (≥50% increase), and/or
  2. Change in ICS and/or
  3. Change in delivery device, and/or
  4. Use of additional therapy as defined by: LABA, theophylline, leukotreine receptor antagonists (LTRAs).
1 year
Asthma-related hospitalisations
Time Frame: 1 year

Defined as sum of:

(i) Definite: Hospitalisations coded with an asthma read code (ii) Definite + Probable: Hospitalisations with an asthma read code + uncoded hospitalisations occurring within a 7-day window (either side of the hospitalisation date) of an asthma read code

1 year
Respiratory hospitalisations
Time Frame: 1 year

Defined as the sum of:

(i) Definite: Hospitalisations coded with a lower respiratory code (ii) Definite + Probable: Hospitalisations with an asthma read code + uncoded hospitalisations occurring within a 7-day window (either side of the hospitalisation date) of a lower respiratory read code

1 year
SABA usage
Time Frame: 1 year
Average daily dosage during outcome year - outcome SABA usage will be categorised within ranges used to match baseline SABA use to optimise matching of the treatment arms.
1 year
ICS compliance
Time Frame: 1 year
Based on prescription refills
1 year
Oral Thrush
Time Frame: 1 year

Defined as:

(i) Topical oral anti-fungal prescriptions, and / or (ii) Coded for oral candidiasis

1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Price, MD, Company Director

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 1991

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

July 22, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 30, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2012

Last Verified

October 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on extra fine particle hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhaler

Subscribe