- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01401153
Cognition Intervention Study Dortmund (CogniDO)
Cross-over Trial Determining the Short-term Effects of Lunch on Children's Cognitive Functioning
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Because of cerebral particularities, children may react sensitive to short-term variations of nutrient supply. Therefore, an optimised composition of meals at nutritionally favourable mealtime should be considered for optimal cognitive performance. The increasing implementation of all-day schools in Germany requires the children's catering at school. However, also the number of 'meal skippers' is increasing among children. Thus, the effect of skipping of the midday meal at school on cognitive functioning is examined in this experimental cross-over trial.
As prior intake of food can have an influence on the physiological effect of test meal, the children's dietary intake in the morning is standardized. The intervention is integrated in the usual everyday school life:
9.15 a.m. standardized snack within the frame of the regular break, 9.45 a.m. to 12.25 p.m. everyday school life, 12.25 p.m. either lunch (control) or only a non-caloric beverage (intervention of 'skipping meal'), 12.45 p.m. to 1.15 p.m. regular lunch break, 1.15 p.m. computerized tests of cognitive functioning, 2 p.m. lunch for the 'skipping meal'-group.
Parameters of cognition with relevance to everyday school life are measured by a computerized test battery of the 'Wiener Testsystem'. Usual eating behaviour, sleep behaviour, physical activity, parental education and migration background are determined as control variables by questionnaires for children, parents and teachers. Beside the Body Mass Index, the individual IQ is measured by a paper-pencil-test.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All sixth grade students of Gesamtschule Berger Feld with the consent of parents and child
Exclusion Criteria:
- Metabolic diseases or special diet
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Having lunch/skipping lunch
Lunch ad libitum on test day 1 and no lunch on test day 2. Water available on both days.
|
Just water.
|
|
Experimental: Skipping lunch/having lunch
No lunch on test day 1 and lunch ad libitum on test day 2. Water available on both days.
|
Just water.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Tonic Alertness (Mean Reaction Time)
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
Mean reaction time to response to a simple visual stimulus without a preceding warning signal
|
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
|
Tonic Alertness (Deviation of Reaction Time)
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
Deviation of reaction time --> logarithmic standard deviation of the reaction times
|
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
|
Tonic Alertness (Commission Errors)
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
Reactions when no stimulus had been presented
|
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
|
Tonic Alertness (Omission Errors)
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
Stimuli to which no reaction follows within 1.5s
|
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
|
Immediate Block Span
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
Longest sequence correctly reproduced in at least two of three items (the test is a task of reproducing prescribed sequences from two to eight blocks)
|
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
|
Incorrect Immediate Block Span
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
Number of sequences incorrectly reproduced
|
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
|
Correct Immediate Block Span
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
Number of sequences correctly reproduced
|
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
|
Sequencing Errors
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
Sequences including all the blocks of a prescribed sequence, but in the wrong order
|
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
|
Reactions
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
Number of total reactions (Subjects have to decide whether a displayed figure is identical with one of four figures shown or not)
|
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
|
Percentage Incorrect Reactions
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
Percentage of incorrect reactions
|
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
|
Number Correct Reactions
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
Number of correct reactions
|
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
|
Incorrect Reactions
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
Number of incorrect reactions
|
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
|
Mean Time Correct Reactions
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
Mean time to react correctly
|
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
|
Mean Time Incorrect Reactions
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
Mean time to react incorrectly
|
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Mathilde Kersting, Prof. Dr., Research Institute of Child Nutrition, Dortmund
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- COG0611DO
- 03MT110527328495 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Uniscientia Stiftung)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cognition - Other
-
Life UniversityUniversity of GeorgiaCompletedCognition - OtherUnited States
-
Université de MontréalNeptune Technologies and Bioressources Inc.Completed
-
BaycrestCogniciti Inc.Withdrawn
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignCompletedPhysiological Stress | Cognition - OtherUnited States
-
Bern University of Applied SciencesSwiss Federal Institute of TechnologyCompletedPoor Performance Status | Cognition - OtherSwitzerland
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignNational Honey BoardCompletedGastrointestinal Dysfunction | Physiological Stress | Cognition - OtherUnited States
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignNational Honey BoardCompletedGastrointestinal Dysfunction | Physiological Stress | Cognition - OtherUnited States
-
Columbia UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Lindenwood UniversityNNB NutritionCompletedCognition - Other | Strength OutcomesUnited States
Clinical Trials on Skipping lunch
-
Research Institute of Child Nutrition, DortmundCompleted
-
Research Institute of Child Nutrition, DortmundCompleted
-
University of HohenheimCompleted
-
University of LiverpoolCompletedObesity | Diet, Healthy | Eating BehaviorUnited Kingdom
-
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research...Completed
-
Research Institute of Child Nutrition, DortmundUnknownCognitive FunctionGermany
-
University of KwaZuluHeidelberg University; Technical University of Munich; Harvard School of Public... and other collaboratorsRecruitingModerate-vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA)South Africa
-
Tampere UniversityCompletedExposure to Nature During Lunch Breaks | Relaxation Exercises During Lunch BreaksFinland
-
Institut Pertanian BogorAjinomoto Co., Inc.UnknownAnemia | Stunting | UnderweightIndonesia
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruiting