Cognition Intervention Study Dortmund (CogniDO)

Cross-over Trial Determining the Short-term Effects of Lunch on Children's Cognitive Functioning

Major aim of this study is to add scientifically proven insights into cognitive effects of meals to the existing recommendations for school meals in Germany. As a first step the short-term effects of skipping lunch on children's cognitive functioning in the afternoon will be examined in a cross-over trial. The study is conducted in a large comprehensive school in Gelsenkirchen (Germany) including about 150 children.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Because of cerebral particularities, children may react sensitive to short-term variations of nutrient supply. Therefore, an optimised composition of meals at nutritionally favourable mealtime should be considered for optimal cognitive performance. The increasing implementation of all-day schools in Germany requires the children's catering at school. However, also the number of 'meal skippers' is increasing among children. Thus, the effect of skipping of the midday meal at school on cognitive functioning is examined in this experimental cross-over trial.

As prior intake of food can have an influence on the physiological effect of test meal, the children's dietary intake in the morning is standardized. The intervention is integrated in the usual everyday school life:

9.15 a.m. standardized snack within the frame of the regular break, 9.45 a.m. to 12.25 p.m. everyday school life, 12.25 p.m. either lunch (control) or only a non-caloric beverage (intervention of 'skipping meal'), 12.45 p.m. to 1.15 p.m. regular lunch break, 1.15 p.m. computerized tests of cognitive functioning, 2 p.m. lunch for the 'skipping meal'-group.

Parameters of cognition with relevance to everyday school life are measured by a computerized test battery of the 'Wiener Testsystem'. Usual eating behaviour, sleep behaviour, physical activity, parental education and migration background are determined as control variables by questionnaires for children, parents and teachers. Beside the Body Mass Index, the individual IQ is measured by a paper-pencil-test.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

105

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All sixth grade students of Gesamtschule Berger Feld with the consent of parents and child

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Metabolic diseases or special diet

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Having lunch/skipping lunch
Lunch ad libitum on test day 1 and no lunch on test day 2. Water available on both days.
Just water.
Experimental: Skipping lunch/having lunch
No lunch on test day 1 and lunch ad libitum on test day 2. Water available on both days.
Just water.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tonic Alertness (Mean Reaction Time)
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Mean reaction time to response to a simple visual stimulus without a preceding warning signal
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Tonic Alertness (Deviation of Reaction Time)
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Deviation of reaction time --> logarithmic standard deviation of the reaction times
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Tonic Alertness (Commission Errors)
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Reactions when no stimulus had been presented
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Tonic Alertness (Omission Errors)
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Stimuli to which no reaction follows within 1.5s
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Immediate Block Span
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Longest sequence correctly reproduced in at least two of three items (the test is a task of reproducing prescribed sequences from two to eight blocks)
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Incorrect Immediate Block Span
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Number of sequences incorrectly reproduced
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Correct Immediate Block Span
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Number of sequences correctly reproduced
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Sequencing Errors
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Sequences including all the blocks of a prescribed sequence, but in the wrong order
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Reactions
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Number of total reactions (Subjects have to decide whether a displayed figure is identical with one of four figures shown or not)
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Percentage Incorrect Reactions
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Percentage of incorrect reactions
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Number Correct Reactions
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Number of correct reactions
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Incorrect Reactions
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Number of incorrect reactions
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Mean Time Correct Reactions
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Mean time to react correctly
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Mean Time Incorrect Reactions
Time Frame: Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)
Mean time to react incorrectly
Participants were tested twice with one week wash out (1h after having/skipping lunch)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mathilde Kersting, Prof. Dr., Research Institute of Child Nutrition, Dortmund

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

July 25, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 9, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2012

Last Verified

October 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • COG0611DO
  • 03MT110527328495 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Uniscientia Stiftung)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognition - Other

Clinical Trials on Skipping lunch

Subscribe