Efficacy of Virtual Reality Exercises in STroke Rehabilitation: A Multicentre Study (EVREST Multicentre)

November 11, 2015 updated by: Unity Health Toronto

Efficacy of Virtual Reality Exercises Using Wii Gaming Technology in STroke Rehabilitation: A Multicentre Randomized Clinical Trial (EVREST Multicentre)

A multicentre, randomized, two parallel group study comparing virtual reality using Wii gaming technology versus Recreational activities in patients receiving conventional rehabilitation after an ischemic stroke.

Primary Hypothesis: Virtual reality using the Wii gaming system is more efficacious in improving motor function than recreational therapy among patients receiving conventional rehabilitation following a recent ischemic stroke.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Virtual reality (VR) gaming systems are novel and potentially useful technologies that allow users to interact in three dimensions with a computer-generated scenario (a virtual world). In particular, the Nintendo Wii gaming system applies relevant concepts in rehabilitation (i.e. repetition, intensity, and task-oriented training of the paretic extremity) showing benefits in motor function improvement after stroke. While standard rehabilitation (i.e. physiotherapy and occupational therapy) helps improve motor function after stroke, the magnitude of its benefit is suboptimal. The implementation of conventional rehabilitation is resource-intensive and costly, usually requiring transportation of patients and affecting adherence. Moreover, as improvement of motor function may be achieved after multiple sessions over a period of rehabilitation. The duration and intensity of the rehabilitation strategy are important factors in its effectiveness. Some studies compared an intervention plus conventional physical therapy versus conventional physical therapy alone, which by necessity allowed for more rehabilitation time in the experimental group. This creates a bias in favour of the new intervention as the intensity and frequency of rehabilitation per se is known to directly and beneficially affect functional outcomes. Therefore, the investigators are proposing comparing VR Wii versus an active control [(recreational activities (RA)].

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

141

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
        • FLENI
      • Sao Paulo, Brazil
        • Lucy Montoro Network
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 0P8
        • University of Calgary
    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3L 2P4
        • Riverview Health Centre
    • Newfoundland and Labrador
      • St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
        • LA Miller Centre
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8L 2X2
        • Hamilton Health Sciences
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6C 5J1
        • Parkwood Hospital, St. Joseph's Health Care London
      • Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5B 1B8
        • Trillium Health Partners
      • Scarborough, Ontario, Canada, M1L 1W1
        • Providence Healthcare
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2A2
        • Toronto Rehabilitation Institute
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • CSSS Cavendish Richardson Hospital
      • Lima, Peru
        • Clinica San Felipe
      • Bangkok, Thailand
        • Siriraj Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has provided written informed consent prior to entry into the study
  • Males or females, aged 18 to 85 years
  • In-patient at the time of randomization
  • Evidence of ischemic stroke confirmed by CT or MRI head scan
  • Patients with onset of symptoms less than 3 months at time of randomization
  • Measurable deficit of the upper extremity (arm) equal to or greater than 3 according to the Chedoke McMaster scale (e.g.: participants should be able to touch their chin and contralateral knee to be eligible)
  • Functional independence prior to present stroke (baseline mRS = 0-1)
  • Patient is alert, medically stable according to the treating physician and able to follow simple verbal commands

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute stroke onset more than 3 months ago
  • Patient is unable to follow verbal commands or has global aphasia
  • Severe illness and life expectancy less than 3 months (cancer, endocarditis, metastasis with an occult primary malignancy, coagulopathy)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension according to the treating physician
  • Unstable angina or recent myocardial infarction (within the last 3 months), current NY Heart Association Class III (marked limitation of physical activity; although patients are comfortable at rest, less-than-ordinary activity leads to fatigue, dyspnea, palpitations, or angina) or IV (symptomatic at rest; symptoms of CHF are present at rest; discomfort increases with any physical activity) or symptomatic ventricular tachyarrhythmias, as per medical history (a baseline ECG will not be required.)
  • Any history of seizure, except for febrile seizures of childhood
  • Pain or joint problems limiting movement of the arm (e.g. shoulder pain)
  • Participation in another clinical trial involving rehabilitation (recreational therapy, occupational therapy, physiotherapy) or involving an investigational drug
  • Patient is unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol or cannot / will not cooperate fully with the investigator or study personnel
  • Any condition(s) that, in the Investigator's opinion, would a) warrant exclusion from the study (i.e., participation in the study is not in the best interest of the patient) or b) prevent the patient from completing the study.
  • Any medical condition that might confound the interpretation of results or put the patient at risk (amputation of one extremity).

Enrollment Criteria

  • Upon meeting all eligibility criteria and providing written informed consent, the patient will be enrolled into the study contingent on successfully completing a one hour training session with Virtual Reality Wii.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Recreational Activity Arm
recreational activity includes playing cards, ominoes, jenga or a ball game.
Recreational activities (playing cards, arts and crafts, dominoes, jenga or a ball game) and conventional rehabilitation.
Experimental: Wii Gaming System Arm
Use of Wii gaming technology (e.g. commercially available games)
Virtual reality Wii games (tennis and bowling from Wii® Sports, and bean bag, bocce ball, ping cup, darts or shuffleboard from Wii® Game Party 3) and conventional rehabilitation.
Other Names:
  • Virtual Reality Wii games

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in motor performance between groups measured using the Wolf Motor function Test.
Time Frame: 1 (±3) days after the end of the intervention
Efficacy in motor function improvement at the end of the intervention will be measured by the abbreviated Wolf Motor Function Test. The Wolf MFT is a time-based method to evaluate upper extremity performance while providing insight into total limb movements. It consists of 15 timed measures and 2 force-based measures which progress in complexity. Difference in Wolf MFT is one of the most commonly used outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation trials.
1 (±3) days after the end of the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in motor function, performing activities of daily living, and quality of life, as well as sustainability of motor improvement
Time Frame: End of intervention and 4 weeks post-intervention
Secondary efficacy outcome measures include Box & Block Test, quality of life as measured by the Stroke Impact Scale, and Barthel Index at the end of the interventions. In addition, sustainability of motor improvement will be assessed through the Wolf Motor Function Test and Box & Block Test conducted at 4 weeks post-intervention, which is approximately 3 months from stroke onset.
End of intervention and 4 weeks post-intervention
Proportion of patients experiencing intervention-related adverse events or any serious adverse events during the study period
Time Frame: Subjects will be followed for the duration of their participation in the study, an expected time frame of 6 weeks
Secondary safety outcome will be measured as the proportion of patients experiencing intervention-related adverse events (e.g. pain, dizziness), or any serious adverse event (death, life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity) during the study period. We will also measure patients' perceived exertion after treatment by using the Borg Perceived Exertion scale (excessive fatigue defined as any score > 13 points)
Subjects will be followed for the duration of their participation in the study, an expected time frame of 6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gustavo Saposnik, MD, Unity Health Toronto
  • Principal Investigator: Mark Bayley, MD, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

August 1, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemic Stroke

Clinical Trials on Recreational Activity

Subscribe