A Double Blind Crossover Study on the Effect of MPH on Decision-making Ability of Adults With BPD Compared to Adults With ADHD and Healthy Adults

August 22, 2012 updated by: Shalvata Mental Health Center

A Double Blind Crossover Study on the Effect of Methylphenidate on Decision-making Ability of Adults With Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) Compared to Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Healthy Adults

The study assesses the effect of Ritalin on working memory,attention,and decision-making measures in adults with BPD and compares it to its effect on healthy adults and adults with BPD (using data form study SHA 01-10), in a double-blind crossover design. The investigators hypothesize that Ritalin will result in better performance in all measures.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Participants will be required to arrive at the cognitive laboratory in "Shalvata" for two visits: the first visit will include obtaining informed consent, screening (as detailed below), and performing a battery of computerized tasks. The second visit will include performing of the same battery of tasks, and payment.

In one of the visits, participants will receive a capsule containing Methylphenidate or placebo (MPH; Ritalin) (dosage: 10 mg in case weight<40 kg; 30 mg in case weight>90 kg; otherwise 20 mg -( The pills will be 10mg each, and the number of pills will be administered according to the dosage stated; 1-3 pills, according to weight). Prior to performing the tasks, and in the other visit they will receive a capsule containing placebo.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hod Hasharon,, Israel
        • Recruiting
        • Shalvata Mental Health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults in the age of 21-50 with diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People diagnosed with a clinical disorder other than BPD or ADD/ADHD that may impair their performance in the tasks used in the study.
  • People for whom there is a contra-indication for consuming Ritalin.
  • Pregnant women and nursing women; Women participants will be required to report whether they are pregnant, and in case they are, they will not participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BPD adults
adults with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)
a capsule containing 20 mg
Other Names:
  • Adults with Borderline Personality Disorder

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA) score
Time Frame: 20 minutes

This test, devised by Greenberg and Kindschi (1996), is one of many continuous performance tests (CPTs), rapid reaction-time tasks in which participants have to discriminate predetermined target stimuli from distracting non-targets. CPTs, and TOVA among them, are widely used both by practitioners and investigators as an objective tool for assessing ADHD and determining beneficial medical effects (Llorente et al. 2001).

The TOVA used here is a standardized, fixed-interval (21.6 ± 1.1 min), visual CPT.

20 minutes
Iowa gambling task (IGT) score
Time Frame: 30 minutes
a computerized version of the Iowa Gambling Task (Bechara et al. 1994), which assesses reward learning. In this task the participant is presented with four decks of cards on the computer screen. Each card yields a reward, but might also cast a loss. In each trial, the participant selects a card out of one of the four decks by clicking on it. Consequently, the card is exposed, displaying the gain and the loss for that trial. The accumulated total amount is presented at the bottom of the screen all along, and is updated after every trial. Through contingent feedback, participants are expected to learn that decks A and B yield constant large gains but also larger losses, so that their net loss across trials is 2,500 tokens, whereas decks C and D yield smaller gains but also smaller losses, leading to a net gain across trials of 2,500 tokens
30 minutes
Foregone Payoff Gambling Task (FPGT) score
Time Frame: 30 minutes
gambling task is a version of the IGT developed for the purpose of the current study. Two differences distinguish it from the original version - a different payoff distribution as detailed in Table 3, and a feedback method called foregone payoffs: following each choice made by the participants, they get to see not only the card chosen but also the other three cards from the three decks not chosen. This provides more information, but can also cause temptation, and may distract participants from the advantageous decks (see e.g., Yechiam et al. 2005; Yechiam and Busemeyer 2006).
30 minutes
Spatial Working Memory (SWM) score
Time Frame: 10 minutes
CANTAB task for assessing Spatial Working Memory
10 minutes
digit span score
Time Frame: 20 minutes
Forward and Backward digit-span task (Wechsler 1981)
20 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hilik Levkovitz, prof., Shalvata MHC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

September 1, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 23, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2012

Last Verified

August 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Borderline Personality Disorder

Clinical Trials on methylphenidate

Subscribe