Effect Of Meloxicam Versus Placebo In Mainland Chinese Patients With Osteoarthritis Of The Knee

December 6, 2020 updated by: Pfizer

A DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER, PARALLEL GROUP STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF MELOXICAM IN MAINLAND CHINESE SUBJECTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS (OA) OF THE KNEE

This study is to validate the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) tool in mainland Chinese patients with osteoarthritis of the knee . This study will also evaluate the effects of Mobic versus placebo on reducing the symptoms of osteoarthritis in this population.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

To validate culturally the WOMAC tool in mainland China and observe the different response of meloxicam and placebo in a patient population with osteoarthritis of the knee

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

408

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100032
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
      • Beijing, China, 100053
        • Rheumatology and Immunology Department, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University
      • Beijing, China, 100029
        • China-Japan Friendship Hospital/Rheumatology Department
      • Beijing, China, 100044
        • Li Zhanguo
      • Beijing, China, 100730
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Orthopaedics
      • Shanghai, China, 200003
        • Rheumatology and Immunology Department, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital
      • Shanghai, China, 200001
        • Renji Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
      • Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Rheumatology Department
      • Tianjin, China, 300052
        • Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital
    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China, 230001
        • Anhui Province Hospital
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510630
        • The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
      • Shantou City, Guangdong, China, 515041
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou Medical Collage
    • Heilongjiang
      • Harbin, Heilongjiang, China, 150001
        • Rheumatology Department, The first Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430022
        • Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210029
        • Jiangsu Province Hospital
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China
        • Rheumatology Department, The First Hospital of China Medical University
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
        • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
      • Liaocheng, Shandong, China, 252000
        • Liaocheng People's Hospital/Orthopaedics
      • Qingdao, Shandong, China, 266011
        • Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital
      • Qingdao, Shandong, China, 266011
        • Department of Immunology and Rheumatology,Qingdao Municipal Hospital
    • Shanxi
      • Xi'an, Shanxi, China, 710032
        • Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital of Sichuan University
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610044
        • Department of Rheumatology and Immunology,West China Hospital of Sichuan University
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610072
        • Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610072
        • Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Rheumatology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects are required to meet the following criteria to be eligible for Randomization into this study:

  • Male or female Chinese subjects, 18-75 years of age;
  • Subjects must have a diagnosis of OA of the index knee based on American College of Rheumatology criteria with X ray confirmation (a Kellgren Lawrence x ray grade of greater than or equal to 2) (Kellgren J. & Lawrence J, 1957)
  • Subjects must have have an NRS and a WOMAC pain sub scale score of 4 at Screening and at Baseline based on four daily diary entries

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects presenting with any of the following will not be included in the study:

  • History of other disease that may involve the index (painful) knee including inflammatory joint diseases or have had recent surgical intervention on the knee.
  • Diagnosed as having or has been treated for esophageal, gastric, pyloric channel, or duodenal ulceration within 30 days prior to receiving the first dose of study medication. History of or active gastrointestinal disease (eg, inflammatory bowel disease), a chronic or acute renal or hepatic disorder, or a significant coagulation defect.
  • Signs and symptoms of clinically significant cardiac disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Meloxicam
7.5mg x2 once a day for 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • Mobic
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
2 Placebo capsules once a day for 12 weeks
Study subjects will be randomized to two treatment groups: one with Meloxicam 7.5 mgx2 once a day and another one with placebo. The duration of the interventional treatment is 12 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Total and the 3 Subscales Scores (Pain, Stiffness and Physical Function) at Screening 1 by Using a Paper Worksheet and a Personalized Electronic LogPad System (E-diary)
Time Frame: Screening 1 (Visit 1: Days -21 to -14)
The WOMAC has 3 subscales: WOMAC pain subscale, WOMAC stiffness subscale and WOMAC physical function subscale, which are comprised of 5, 2 and 17 questions regarding the amount of pain and stiffness experienced in the index knee, and degree of difficulty in doing daily tasks, respectively in the past 48 hours. The WOMAC subscale scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating higher pain, more stiffness and worse function respectively for pain, stiffness and physical function subscales. The WOMAC subscale scores were calculated as the mean of the scores from the individual questions. The WOMAC total score was the sum of scores from the 5, 2 and 17 questions respectively on pain, stiffness and physical function subscales. WOMAC total score ranged from 0 to 240, where higher scores indicated worse health condition.
Screening 1 (Visit 1: Days -21 to -14)
WOMAC Total and the 3 Subscales Scores (Pain, Stiffness and Physical Function) at Screening 2 by Using E-diary
Time Frame: Screening 2 (Visit 2: Days -14 to -10)
The WOMAC has 3 subscales: WOMAC pain subscale, WOMAC stiffness subscale and WOMAC physical function subscale, which are comprised of 5, 2 and 17 questions regarding the amount of pain and stiffness experienced in the index knee, and degree of difficulty in doing daily tasks, respectively in the past 48 hours. The WOMAC subscale scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating higher pain, more stiffness and worse function respectively for pain, stiffness and physical function subscales. The WOMAC subscale scores were calculated as the mean of the scores from the individual questions. The WOMAC total score was the sum of scores from the 5, 2 and 17 questions respectively on pain, stiffness and physical function subscales. WOMAC total score ranged from 0 to 240, where higher scores indicated worse health condition.
Screening 2 (Visit 2: Days -14 to -10)
WOMAC Total and the 3 Subscales Scores (Pain, Stiffness and Physical Function) at Baseline by Using E-diary
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1)
The WOMAC has 3 subscales: WOMAC pain subscale, WOMAC stiffness subscale and WOMAC physical function subscale, which are comprised of 5, 2 and 17 questions regarding the amount of pain and stiffness experienced in the index knee, and degree of difficulty in doing daily tasks, respectively in the past 48 hours. The WOMAC subscale scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating higher pain, more stiffness and worse function respectively for pain, stiffness and physical function subscales. The WOMAC subscale scores were calculated as the mean of the scores from the individual questions. The WOMAC total score was the sum of scores from the 5, 2 and 17 questions respectively on pain, stiffness and physical function subscales. WOMAC total score ranged from 0 to 240, where higher scores indicated worse health condition.
Baseline (Day 1)
WOMAC Total and the 3 Subscales Scores (Pain, Stiffness and Physical Function) at Week 12 by Using E-diary
Time Frame: Visit 8 (Week 12)
The WOMAC has 3 subscales: WOMAC pain subscale, WOMAC stiffness subscale and WOMAC physical function subscale, which are comprised of 5, 2 and 17 questions regarding the amount of pain and stiffness experienced in the index knee, and degree of difficulty in doing daily tasks, respectively in the past 48 hours. The WOMAC subscale scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating higher pain, more stiffness and worse function respectively for pain, stiffness and physical function subscales. The WOMAC subscale scores were calculated as the mean of the scores from the individual questions. The WOMAC total score was the sum of scores from the 5, 2 and 17 questions respectively on pain, stiffness and physical function subscales. WOMAC total score ranged from 0 to 240, where higher scores indicated worse health condition.
Visit 8 (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
WOMAC pain subscale is comprised of 5 questions regarding the amount of pain experienced in the index knee in the past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain subscale scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating higher pain. The WOMAC pain subscale score was calculated as the mean of the scores from the individual questions.
Baseline and Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Subscale and Average Scores at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
The WOMAC has 3 subscales: WOMAC pain subscale, WOMAC stiffness subscale and WOMAC physical function subscale, which are comprised of 5, 2 and 17 questions regarding the amount of pain and stiffness experienced in the index knee, and degree of difficulty in doing daily tasks, respectively in the past 48 hours. The WOMAC subscale scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating higher pain, more stiffness and worse function respectively for pain, stiffness and physical function subscales. The WOMAC subscale scores were calculated as the mean of the scores from the individual questions. Change from baseline was calculated for each WOMAC subscale (pain, stiffness, physical function) and WOMAC average score.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Items at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
WOMAC pain subscale is comprised of 5 questions regarding the amount of pain experienced in the index knee in the past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain subscale scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating higher pain. Change from baseline in two of the WOMAC pain subscale items: pain when walking on a flat surface, and pain when going up or down stairs were calculated.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
WOMAC pain subscale is comprised of 5 questions regarding the amount of pain experienced in the index knee in the past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain subscale scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating higher pain. The WOMAC pain subscale score was calculated as the mean of the scores from the individual questions. WOMAC pain subscale response rates at Week 12 were shown for the reductions from Baseline of greater than (>) 0%, 10% to 90% (in steps of 10%).
Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30% and 50% Reduction From Baseline in the WOMAC Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
WOMAC pain subscale is comprised of 5 questions regarding the amount of pain experienced in the index knee in the past 48 hours. The WOMAC pain subscale scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating higher pain. The WOMAC pain subscale score was calculated as the mean of the scores from the individual questions.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Osteoarthritis (PGAO) at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
PGAO questionnaire ("Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee affects you, how are you doing today?") was comprised of 5 scores with 1=very good to 5=very poor, where higher grades indicated more effect of osteoarthritis.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Percentage of Participants With >=2 Points Improvement in PGAO From Baseline at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
PGAO questionnaire ("Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee affects you, how are you doing today?") was comprised of 5 grades with 1=very good to 5=very poor, where higher grades indicated more effect of osteoarthritis. The treatment response of an improvement of >=2 points from Baseline in PGAO were summarized.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Domain Scores and Component Scores at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
The SF-36 is a self-administered questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems (role-physical), social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems (role-emotional), vitality, and general health perception. There are also 2 component scores derived from the 8 subscale scores: physical component summary (including physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain and general health) and mental component summary (including vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health). Each SF-36 domain and component summary score ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect better participant health status.
Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Domains (EQ-5D) Level at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
The EQ-5D is a generic measure of health related quality of life. The EQ-5D has 5 items that assess the level of difficulty (none [score of 1], some/moderate [score of 2], extreme [score of 3]) respondents report for 5 health status domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The change from Baseline (decrease by 2, 1, 0, -1 and -2) at Week 12 in each of the 5 health status domains were summarized.
Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Pain Score in the Index Knee Using 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Daily average knee pain was assessed with an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated worse pain. The participants described their pain in the index knee during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number from 0 to 10.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 24, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 27, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

March 27, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

September 8, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Clinical Trials on Meloxicam

Subscribe