Actinic Keratoses Treatment With Metvix® in Combination With Light

January 9, 2019 updated by: University Hospital, Limoges

Efficacy and Safety of Metvix® Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy Versus Conventional Metvix® Photodynamic Therapy in Subject With Mild Actinic Keratoses

The main objective of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of Metvix® natural daylight photodynamic therapy with those of Metvix® conventional photodynamic therapy in subjects with mild actinic keratoses (intra-individual comparison)

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Limoges, France, 87042
        • Limoges university hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female above 18 years;
  • Subject with clinical diagnosis of mild Actinic Keratosis (AK) on the face or the scalp with or without clinical diagnosis of moderate AK on the target areas (TAs);

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject with clinical diagnosis of at least one severe AK on TAs
  • Subject with clinical diagnosis of other skin disease (including non-melanoma skin cancer) on the TAs;
  • Subject with pigmented AK on the TAs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Daylight
Metvix® (160mg/g) and Photodynamic Therapy Daylight One session at baseline
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a medical treatment that utilizes a photosensitizing molecule (Metvix) and a the day light to activate the applied drug
Active Comparator: Conventional treatment
Metvix® (160mg/g) and Photodynamic Therapy Blue light One session at baseline
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a medical treatment that utilizes a photosensitizing molecule (Metvix) and a blue light source to activate the applied drug

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Number of Treated Mild Lesions Per Side at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12

The number of lesions is assessed at baseline (before treatment) and 12 weeks later.

The difference in lesions is recorded for each patient. The mean of disappeared lesions are then calculated for all patients.

Baseline and Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Assesment
Time Frame: at inclusion (after treatment)

Pain assesment with a VAS Pain scale

Visual analog scale [VAS] is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal scale of 10 cm length . The scale is anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 10).

at inclusion (after treatment)
Lesions Disappearance Rate at 1 Months From Baseline.
Time Frame: 0(baseline),1 month

The number of lesions is assessed at baseline (before treatment) and 1 month later.

The difference in lesions is recorded for each patient. The rate is the quotient: " difference in lesions between baseline and at 1 month "/nubmer of lesions at baseline

0(baseline),1 month
Lesions Disappearance Rate at 6 Months From Baseline.
Time Frame: 0(baseline), 6 month

The number of lesions is assessed at baseline (before treatment) and 6 month later.

The difference in lesions is recorded for each patient. The rate is the quotient: " difference in lesions between baseline and at 6 month "/nubmer of lesions at baseline

0(baseline), 6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 25, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 22, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Actinic Keratoses

Clinical Trials on Metvix®

3
Subscribe