Efficacy Study of Radiotherapy Alone Versus CCRT With Temozolomide in Grade III Gliomas Without 1p/19q Codeletion

July 7, 2015 updated by: Jong Hoon Kim

A Randomized Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Between Only Radiotherapy Versus CCRT With Temozolomide in Newly Diagnosed Grade III Gliomas Without 1p/19q Codeletion

  1. The management of anaplastic gliomas of WHO grade 3 is currently largely based on surgery followed by radiotherapy, of which prognosis remains still dismal with the median survival of 2-5 years. To date, the benefit of chemo for WHO grade 3 gliomas is unclear of modest at best with conventional cytotoxic agents, and the role of temozolomide for these entities still is not elucidated.
  2. Codeletion of chromosome 1p/19q is considered the most important marker of prognostic significance in WHO grade 3 gliomas.
  3. To project a randomized phase 2 screening trial examining the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide for WHO grade 3 gliomas without codeletion of chromosome 1p/19q.
  4. The prognostic significance of methylation status of MGMT and IDH1 mutation as molecular markers will be also assessed in each arm as key secondary analysis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The role of chemotherapy for gliomas has been recently reappraised by the advent of temozolomide, especially for glioblastomas, and further investigation is now being directed to unveiling its optimal indications, dosing protocols, and the most relevant prognostic factors. Meanwhile, the management of anaplastic gliomas of WHO grade 3 (anaplastic astrocytomas, anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, and anaplastic oligoastrocytomas) is currently largely based on surgery followed by radiotherapy, of which prognosis remains still dismal with the median survival of 2-5 years. To date, the benefit of chemo for WHO grade 3 gliomas is unclear of modest at best with conventional cytotoxic agents, and the role of temozolomide for these entities still is not elucidated. Moreover, WHO grade 3 gliomas are now known to consist of heterogeneous groups of different histologic features, biological behaviors, and prognoses. Accordingly, relevant molecular markers are appreciated with the growing body of data that showing their implications on response to therapy and survival, including codeletion of chromosome 1p/19q, methylation status of methylguanine methyl transferase (MGMT), and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation.1,4-6,11 Among those, codeletion of chromosome 1p/19q is considered the most important marker of prognostic significance in WHO grade 3 gliomas.

One recent Korean prospective cohort study showed the potential survival benefit and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide for WHO grade 3 gliomas. In this study, however, the role of molecular markers such as codeletion of chromosome 1p/19q and MGMT methylation could not be determined because of small number of patients available. These results prompted this Korean group to project a randomized phase 2 screening trial examining the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide for WHO grade 3 gliomas without codeletion of chromosome 1p/19q. The basic concept of the present clinical trial is "a subgroup with expected worse prognosis according to the status of chromosome 1p/19q, i.e. one without codeletion of chromosome 1p/19q is to be managed more aggressively", to investigate the role of temozolomide. An aggressive therapy (surgery + concurrent chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide) will be compared to the conventional arm (surgery + radiotherapy only) in terms of its efficacy and safety for WHO grade 3 gliomas without chromosome 1p/19q codeletion. The prognostic significance of methylation status of MGMT and IDH1 mutation as molecular markers will be also assessed in each arm as key secondary analysis. Until now, there have been no such trials examining the efficacy and safety of temozolomide for WHO grade 3 gliomas based on prospective molecular stratification.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed histologically proven supratentorial anaplastic gliomas.The histological diagnosis must be obtained from a neurosurgical resection or biopsy of a tumor including an open biopsy or stereotactic biopsy.
  • Absence of chromosome 1p/19q co-deletion
  • Age 18 years
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1
  • Stable or decreasing dose of steroids for 5 days prior to randomization
  • Meets 1 of the following RPA classifications:class III-V
  • Adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria:

  • Prior chemotherapy within last 5 years
  • Prior radiotherapy of the head and neck area
  • Receiving concurrent investigational agents or has received an investigational agent within 30 days prior to randomization
  • Planned surgery for other diseases (e.g. dental extraction)
  • History of malignancy. Subjects with curatively treated cervical carcinoma in situ or basal cell carcinoma of the skin, or subjects who have been free of other malignancies for 5 years are eligible for this study
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Subject who disagree to follow acceptable methods of contraception
  • Concurrent illness including unstable heart disease despite appropriate treatment, history of myocardial infarction within 6 months, serious neurological or psychological disease, and uncontrolled infection
  • Subject unable to undergo Gd-MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: only Radiotherapy
fractionated focal irradiation in daily fractions of 2 Gy given 5 days per week for 6 weeks, for a total of 60 Gy
Active Comparator: CCRT with Temozolomide
RT with daily temozolomide (75 mg/m2/day, 7 days/week) from the first to the last day of radiotherapy) and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy (150-200 mg/m2 po qd for 5 days q 28 days for 6 cycles).
RT with daily temozolomide (75 mg/m2/day, 7 days/week) from the first to the last day of radiotherapy) and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy (150-200 mg/m2 po qd for 5 days q 28 days for 6 cycles)
Other Names:
  • Temodal

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2-year progression free survival(PFS)
Time Frame: Assessed and followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 months
Final primary end-point: 2 year PFS. Progression free survival(PFS) is defined as the time from randomization to progressive disease or death, which ever occurs earlier.
Assessed and followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
5-year overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: assessed at 10 wks, 22 wks, 34 wks, and followed up every 4 months until documentation of death.
final secondary end-point : 5-year OS. Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death, which ever occurs earlier.
assessed at 10 wks, 22 wks, 34 wks, and followed up every 4 months until documentation of death.
5-year progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: assessed at 10 wks, 22 wks, 34 wks, and followed up every 4 months until documentation of disease progression or death.
final end-point : 5-year PFS
assessed at 10 wks, 22 wks, 34 wks, and followed up every 4 months until documentation of disease progression or death.
Safety (adverse events)
Time Frame: up to 5 years
up to 5 years
Methylation status of MGMT
Time Frame: baseline
confirmed by MS-PCR.
baseline
IDH mutation
Time Frame: baseline
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeong Hoon Kim, Professor, Asan Medical Center
  • Study Director: Jae Young Kim, professor, SNUH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 17, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 9, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anaplastic Glioma of Brain

Clinical Trials on Temozolomide (Temodal)

Subscribe