Systematic Review: Retigabine for Adjunctive Therapy in Partial Epilepsy

September 12, 2013 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline
There are a number of anti-epileptic drugs available for the treatment of partial onset seizures in patients with epilepsy. This study is a systematic review of the published literature on anti-epileptic drugs and is designed to compare the relative effectiveness and tolerability of a selection of them with retigabine. The drugs chosen for this comparison were lacosamide, pregabalin, tiagabine, zonisamide and eslicarbazepine. They were chosen because they belong to the newer generation of drugs for epilepsy (as does retigabine) and they have a similar license as well as having published data from studies that were conducted in similar patient populations with similar methods. GSK commissioned YHEC (York Health Economic Consortium) to carry out this review and analysis. YHEC identified relevant studies from international databases. These studies had compared one of the chosen anti-epileptic drugs with placebo. The results were pooled and combined in order to summarize the data for individual drugs as well to compare the results for different drugs with each other and with retigabine. Since none of the individual clinical studies compared one active drug with another, this systematic review is an indirect comparison of these drugs, using an established and recognised methodology which has well understood limitations.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

6498

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

We included published papers on studies that had recruited drug-resistant (or refractory) partial epilepsy of all types

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have participated to a study that meets the following criteria:
  • Be a study of retigabine, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, zonisamide, pregabalin or tiagabine as an adjuvant therapy, compared to placebo or another drug;
  • Be a randomized, placebo-controlled, add-on trial, or a parallel trial or cross-over trial in which data from the first treatment period could be treated as a parallel study;
  • Have recruited patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy (i.e., simple partial, complex partial, and/or secondarily generalised tonic-clonic seizures not controlled by at least 1 or more other AEDs);
  • Have a maintenance treatment period of 8 weeks or longer, with a prospective baseline of minimum 4 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Drug-resistant (or refractory) partial epilepsy of all types
oral - all doses
Other Names:
  • Trobalt (R); Potiga (R)
oral - all doses
Other Names:
  • Vimpat
oral - all doses
Other Names:
  • Zonegran
oral - all doses
Other Names:
  • Lyrica
oral - all doses
Other Names:
  • Zebinix

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Responder Rate
Time Frame: Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Proportion of patients who respond to treatment (50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline)
Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Median Seizure reduction
Time Frame: Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Median percent reduction in seizure frequency from baseline
Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Seizure severity
Time Frame: Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Seizure severity (any definitions acceptable)
Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Time to onset of treatment effect
Time Frame: Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Time to onset of treatment effect
Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Seizure free patients
Time Frame: Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Proportion of patients who are seizure free (and time period over which this was measured)
Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Changes in HRQoL
Time Frame: Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Changes in HRQoL
Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
All drop outs
Time Frame: Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Proportion of patients who drop out of the studies for any reason
Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Drop outs due to AE
Time Frame: Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Proportion of patients who drop out of the studies (as a result of adverse events i.e. tolerability)
Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Adverse events
Time Frame: Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Percentage of patients reporting 5 key adverse events identified by the Cochrane Epilepsy Group as common and important adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs: ataxia, dizziness, fatigue, nausea or somnolence
Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Mortality
Time Frame: Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period
Mortality
Duration of studies included in the systematic review up to 28 weeks of double blind period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

April 30, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epilepsy

Clinical Trials on retigabine/ezogabine

Subscribe