Determining the Optimal Adenosine Provocation Test (impact)

July 10, 2014 updated by: E. van der Wiel, University Medical Center Groningen

Determining the Optimal Dry Powder Adenosine Provocation Test to Assess Small Airways Disease

Asthma is a frequently occurring inflammatory lung disease that affects the whole bronchial tree including the small airways (<2mm). Since the introduction of the solution hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) technology it is possible to generate medication with small particles of approximately 1-2 μm, and therefore to reach the small airways. However, at this moment the investigators have no reliable instruments to identify the asthmatic subjects who particularly benefit from treatment with inhaled small particles. Recently the investigators research group investigated whether provocation with small and large particles AMP is able to identify responders and non-responders to treatment with small and large particles of inhaled corticosteroids. This provocation technique gave promising results but needs further optimization.

The aim of this study is to determine the optimal particle size of dry powder adenosine to assess small airway involvement in asthma. Secondary, to provide insight in the associations between the standard test, executed with nebulized AMP, and the new test, executed with dry powder Adenosine.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a cross-over study. The study population consists of 10 non-smoking asthma patients in the age of 18-65 years who have a PC20 metacholine value ≤4.9mg/ml.

Participating subjects perform 6 provocation tests in randomized order: one test with nebulized methacholine, one test with nebulized AMP, four times dry powder adenosine provocation test. (small particles with inhaled with a slow flow, small particles inhaled with a fast flow, large particles inhaled with a slow flow, large particles inhaled with a fast flow)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9700RB
        • University Medical Center Groningen
      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9700 RB
        • University Medical Center Groningen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A doctor's diagnosis of asthma
  • Age: 18-65 years
  • PC20 AMP < 320 mg/ml
  • Non-smoker
  • Steroid naive or steroids have been stopped 4 weeks before entry into the baseline period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent exacerbation asthma (<2 months) or upper respiration tract infection (<2 weeks)
  • Severe airway obstruction at baseline, FEV1pred< 50% or < 1.2L
  • Diagnosis of COPD or any other pulmonary disease that could influence the study results as judged by the investigator
  • Pregnancy or lactating women. (i.e. women of childbearing potential who do not use adequate anticonception as judged by the investigator).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: bronchial provocationtest
Provocation tests with adenosine dry powder and nebulized AMP (adenosine-5'monophosphate). The AMP provocation test is a standard test and consists of 14 doubling concentrations in a range of 0.04mg/ml to 320mg/ml. The aerosols will be inhaled during tidal breathing for 2 minutes. The dry powder adenosine also consists of 14 doubling steps with doses in a range of 0.01mg to 20mg.
Provocation tests with adenosine dry powder and nebulized AMP (adenosine-5'monophosphate). The AMP provocation test is a standard test and consists of 14 doubling concentrations in a range of 0.04mg/ml to 320mg/ml. The aerosols will be inhaled during tidal breathing for 2 minutes. The dry powder adenosine also consists of 14 doubling steps with doses in a range of 0.01mg to 20mg.
Other Names:
  • bronchial challenge test
  • AMP test
  • adenosine bronchial provocation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The small airway reaction to provocation with adenosine, reflected by the IOS parameter R5-R20
Time Frame: Small airway reaction is measured during each provocation test. The Visits will take place in a period of 6 weeks.
The R5-R20 is measured with the IOS. This a method to determine the resistance of the small airways. The R5-R20 is measured during each provocation test after each provocative step.
Small airway reaction is measured during each provocation test. The Visits will take place in a period of 6 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The total airway reaction to provocation with adenosine, reflected by the decline in FEV1 (PD20/ PC20 values)
Time Frame: Lung function is measured during each provocation test. All visits take place in a period of 6 weeks.
We want to compare the different PD20/PC20 values of the three dry powder adenosine provocation test and with the nebulized AMP provocation test. The lung function is measured after each provocative step to determine the point of 20% decline in FEV1. The provocation test is ended after the last step or is ended prematurely when there is a 20% fall of FEV1 compared to baseline
Lung function is measured during each provocation test. All visits take place in a period of 6 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Nick ten Hacken, MD, Phd, University Medical Center Groningen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

June 4, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 11, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Bronchial provocation test

3
Subscribe