Ultrasound Guided Distal Sciatic Nerve Block - a Comparison With Nerve Stimulator Technique

August 27, 2013 updated by: Dr.med.Ronald Seidel, Helios Research Center

Ultrasound Guided Distal Sciatic Nerve Block - a Randomised Comparison With Nerve Stimulator Technique

For distal sciatic nerve block this prospective, randomised comparison with ultrasound guided distal subepineural block tested the hypothesis, that intraepineural injection of local anesthetic using nerve stimulation technique is common and associated with high success rate.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Classical methods for nerve localization (loss of resistance, cause of paresthesias, nerve stimulation technique)assumed that the target is a close approximation to the nerve, without epineural perforation. Intraneural injections were considered as evitable, with high risk for nerve damages.

Ultrasound guidance provided for the first time a real-time visualization of the spread of local anesthetic. Some recent studies proved, that an intraneural injection using nerve stimulator technique is common and not necessarily accompanied with nerve damages.

In the ultrasound group (group US) the investigators tested the hypothesis, that an intraneural injection of local anesthetic generate a high success rate and a short onset time without clinical apparent nerve damages.

In the nerve-stimulation group (group NS) the investigators tested the hypothesis, that an intraneural injection of local anesthetic is common, and in case of intraneural injection accompanied likewise with high success rate and shorter onset time.

For the sciatic division the investigators tested the hypothesis, that classical methods of nerve localization (nerve-stimulation technique, cause of paresthesias) are not able to avoid epineural perforation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • elective surgery on the foot or ankle
  • tourniquet distal of the knee
  • adult patients, 18-75 years old
  • ASA-risk-groups I-III (American Society of Anesthesiologists)
  • informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe coagulopathy
  • systemic inflammatory response
  • ASA-risk-groups > III (American Society of Anesthesiologists)
  • drug allergy: local anesthetics
  • pregnancy, lactation period
  • participation in other studies
  • addiction to drugs or alcohol
  • non-cooperative patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: group US

Ultrasound guided block :

20ml Prilocaine 1% and 10ml Ropivacaine 0.75% (30ml Prilocaine 1% in outpatients)

Prior to performing the regional anesthesia the investigators administered midazolam as a premedication by mouth (3,75-7,5mg) or intravenously (2-3mg).
Other Names:
  • Dormicum
20ml Prilocaine 1% for distal sciatic nerve block (30ml Prilocaine 1% in outpatients)
Other Names:
  • Xylonest
10ml Ropivacaine 0.75% for distal sciatic nerve block (not in outpatients)
Other Names:
  • Naropin
10ml Prilocaine 1% for saphenous nerve block
Other Names:
  • Xylonest
In group US the sciatic nerve localization and needle guidance is realized using ultrasound.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: group NS

Nerve stimulation technique:

20ml Prilocaine 1% and 10ml Ropivacaine 0.75% (30ml Prilocaine 1% in outpatients)

Prior to performing the regional anesthesia the investigators administered midazolam as a premedication by mouth (3,75-7,5mg) or intravenously (2-3mg).
Other Names:
  • Dormicum
20ml Prilocaine 1% for distal sciatic nerve block (30ml Prilocaine 1% in outpatients)
Other Names:
  • Xylonest
10ml Ropivacaine 0.75% for distal sciatic nerve block (not in outpatients)
Other Names:
  • Naropin
10ml Prilocaine 1% for saphenous nerve block
Other Names:
  • Xylonest
In the group NS sciatic nerve localization and needle guidance is realized using nerve stimulation technique. However, ultrasound is used observing (Observer) the procedure, but blinded for the physician (Anesthetist) performing the block.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success Rate Without Supplementation
Time Frame: within 30-60 minutes after injection of the local anesthetic

After injection of local anesthetic a waiting period of 30-60 minutes was defined before completing a failed block.

  1. success without supplementation = no additional analgetics or rescue blocks required (success rate without supplementation, outcome measure 1)
  2. success with supplementation = analgetics or selective rescue blocks distal of the sciatic division required (success rate without supplementation and additionally all supplemented blocks, outcome measure 3)
  3. failed block = change of anesthetic procedure (general, spinal) or rescue blocks proximal of the sciatic division
within 30-60 minutes after injection of the local anesthetic
Time Until Readiness for Surgery (Minutes)
Time Frame: within 60 minutes after injection of the local anesthetic
within 60 minutes after injection of the local anesthetic
Success Rate With Supplementation
Time Frame: later than 30-60 minutes after injection of the local anesthetic

After injection of local anesthetic a waiting period of 30-60 minutes was defined before completing a failed block.

  1. success without supplementation = no additional analgetics or rescue blocks required (success rate without supplementation, outcome measure 1)
  2. success with supplementation = analgetics or selective rescue blocks distal of the sciatic division required (success rate without supplementation and additionally all supplemented blocks, outcome measure 3)
  3. failed block = change of anesthetic procedure (general, spinal) or rescue blocks proximal of the sciatic divisionSucces rate with supplementation
later than 30-60 minutes after injection of the local anesthetic

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Georg Rehmert, Dr. med., Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Helios Kliniken Schwerin, Wismarsche Strasse 393-7, DE-19049 Schwerin

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 1, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2013

Last Verified

August 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Other Surgical Procedures

Clinical Trials on midazolam

3
Subscribe