Utility of High-Fidelity Simulation In the Education and Assessment of Residents in the Recognition and Management of the Sepsis Syndrome

December 7, 2015 updated by: NYU Langone Health
The primary objective of the proposed study will be to determine if a multi-modality teaching curriculum utilizing high-fidelity simulation and didactic lecture will result in sustained improvement by internal medicine residents in written knowledge and clinical performance when compared to residents receiving a curriculum utilizing only didactic lecture. The investigators hypothesis is that the addition of high-fidelity simulation to a traditional didactic lecture curriculum will result in sustained and superior written knowledge and practical performance when compared to a group receiving only didactic lecture on the same topic. Specifically, the investigators will be assessing internal medicine resident knowledge and performance in the area of sepsis in the hospitalized patient, and will shape the investigators teaching curriculum around this focus.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized prospective single-blinded pilot study. Residents from the internal medicine residency program will be assigned a unique number to de-identify them, and then randomized, stratified by post-graduate year (PGY) level, by random number generator to intervention and control groups. Only de-identified information will be used in subsequent analysis, and no individual results will be used. Residents will not know to which group they have been randomized.

Both the intervention and control groups will take a pre-course survey assessing their level of training, area of specialty/interest, and level of confidence in the recognition and management of sepsis.

Both the intervention and control groups will then be put through 2-4 simulated scenarios using high-fidelity simulation. In the intervention group, these scenarios will be sepsis syndrome scenarios. In the control group, non-sepsis scenarios will be administered.

Immediately following the scenarios, a written knowledge quiz focusing on recognition and management of sepsis will be administered to subjects in both groups.

Following the quiz, there will be a debrief session for subjects in both groups of the simulation scenarios, pointing out what was done correctly and what was not.

There will then be a brief didactic teaching session focusing on recognition and management of sepsis administered to subjects in both groups.

2-4 months later, subjects in both groups will be brought back to the simulation lab and tested on a new identical set of simulated sepsis scenarios. This will be videotaped and scored by an impartial volunteer who will score performance according to a check-list of critical actions. Following the simulated scenarios, the written quiz administered at the first visit will be given again. Subjects in both groups will then get debriefed on their performance.

Data can then be compared between the control and intervention group in terms of written and practical performance. Other potential analyses include before and after performance in the intervention group, comparison between the intervention and control groups, as well as subanalysis by PGY level. Student's paired and unpaired t-test will be the model for statistical analysis, and the investigators will utilize a statistician for data analysis.

In developing and implementing a multi-modality sepsis teaching curriculum, and demonstrating its superiority to a didactic-only curriculum, the investigators hope to justify the permanent implementation of a multi-modality teaching module to educate residents (and other healthcare personnel) which will lead to improved recognition and management of sepsis and improved patient outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10010
        • VA Harbor Simulation Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English-speaking internal medicine resident trainees

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anyone not meeting inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Debriefing of high-fidelity sepsis simulation scenarios

First visit:

  • Subjects will fill out a self-assessment focusing on perceptions of their knowledge and ability in the recognition and management of sepsis in hospitalized patient
  • Subjects will be specifically exposed to high-fidelity simulated sepsis scenarios and be debriefed on their performance in these scenarios (intervention)
  • Subjects will take a written test focusing on early recognition and management of sepsis
  • Subjects will receive a didactic teaching session focusing on recognition and management of early sepsis in the hospitalized patient

In the second visit:

  • Subjects will be exposed to a number of high-fidelity simulated sepsis scenarios and be scored on their performance in management of these scenarios
  • Subjects will take a written test of knowledge focusing on early recognition and management of sepsis
  • Subjects will then be debriefed specifically on their performance in the simulation scenarios
Educational intervention
Other Names:
  • Education
  • High-fidelity simulation
  • Debriefing
Placebo Comparator: Debriefing of high-fidelity non-sepsis simulation scenarios

First visit:

  • Subjects will fill out a self-assessment survey of their perceptions of their knowledge and ability in the recognition and management of sepsis in the hospitalized patient
  • Subjects will be exposed to high-fidelity simulation scenarios (non-sepsis) and be debriefed in terms of their performance in these scenarios
  • Subjects will take a written test of knowledge focusing on early recognition and management of sepsis
  • Subjects will receive a didactic teaching session focusing on recognition and management of early sepsis in the hospitalized patient

In the second visit:

  • Subjects will be exposed to a number of high-fidelity simulated sepsis scenarios and be scored on their performance in management of the scenarios
  • Subjects will take a written test of knowledge focusing on early recognition and management of sepsis
  • Subjects will then be debriefed specifically on their performance in the simulation scenarios

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance on a written assessment of the recognition and management of early sepsis in the hospitalized patient.
Time Frame: 2-4 months after intervention
Written test
2-4 months after intervention
Performance on a practical assessment of the recognition and management of early sepsis in the hospitalized patient.
Time Frame: 2-4 months after intervention
Graded performance in simulated sepsis scenario utilizing high-fidelity simulation
2-4 months after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-assessment of knowledge and ability in the recognition and management of early sepsis in the hospitalized patient.
Time Frame: 2-4 months after intervention
Written self-assessment survey
2-4 months after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2015

Last Verified

December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Clinical Performance

Clinical Trials on Debriefing of high-fidelity sepsis simulation scenarios

Subscribe