Intranasal Fentanyl as an Analgesic for Cystoscopic Procedures

July 25, 2015 updated by: Richard C Reznichek, MD, Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center

A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Nasal Spray to Placebo as an Analgesic, in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Cystoscopic Procedures

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of intranasally-administrated fentanyl spray to decrease the pain during cystoscopy (the passage of a telescopic instrument into the bladder for purpose of diagnosing the cause of blood in the urine, urinary complaints or any other problems with the urinary bladder). The current standard practice is to use Lidocaine jelly (a local anesthetic) given through the urethra to lubricate and decrease pain. In this study, an additional medicine (fentanyl) is used to reduce pain that occurs during and after the above procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this double-blind study, a nasal spray of either the drug (fentanyl -- an opioid analgesic) or placebo (normal saline) is administered before the procedure. There is a 50% chance that patients receive the drug or the placebo. In either case, local Lidocaine jelly is used as an anesthetic in the urethra. Each patient is compensated for time and traveling after the completion of his/her participation.

Patients are asked to arrive between 7 and 11 PM on the evening prior to their procedure for an overnight admission to 5 East ward, on the 5th floor of the Harbor UCLA Medical Center in Torrance, California, United States. Once there, vital signs (blood pressure, pulse, oxygen saturation -- amount of oxygen in the blood, and breathing rate) is checked and an intravenous line is placed. Before, during and after the procedure, patients are asked to rate their pain on a scale of 0 to 10 with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "the worst pain possible."

Regardless of whether patients are assigned to receive fentanyl or placebo, they receive the standard of care for this cystoscopic procedure.

Once in the cystoscopy room, patients receive the study drug by nasal (into the nose) spray. The study drug is supplied in a pre-filled syringe that contains either 100 mcg of fentanyl or placebo (normal saline with no active medicine in it). Once the study drug is given, the vital signs are closely monitored(checked) until the effect of drug wears off, usually between 2 and 4 hours.

Blood samples are drawn on several occasions. This blood is used to see how much of the study drug (fentanyl or placebo) appears in the blood.

Adverse effects: The well-known adverse effects of opioids may occur after nasal as well as conventional routes of administration; however, severe adverse effects such as respiratory depression or hypotension do not seem to occur in any appreciable frequency.

Intranasal fentanyl has been used safely and effectively in many studies. There are no reports of any serious side effects with the small dose (100 mcg) that is being used in this study. Intranasal fentanyl is generally well tolerated with no serious adverse events. In cancer patients treated for breakthrough pain, the main treatment related side effects were nausea, vertigo, dizziness, constipation, and somnolence. For local side effects, fentanyl displays little local irritation, nasal discomfort or taste experiences. Nasal irritation, skin pain, nasal mucosa ulcers and dysgeusia have been occasionally reported as minor side effects.

The following minor side effects have been reported with other forms of fentanyl (oral, patch or intravenous): anxiety; confusion; difficulty walking; dizziness; drowsiness; dry mouth; headache; itching; nausea and vomiting.

The following severe side effects have not been reported with intranasal fentanyl but have been reported with other forms of fentanyl (oral, patch or intravenous): allergic reactions (rash; hives; difficulty breathing; tightness in the chest; swelling of the mouth, face, lips, or tongue); excessive dizziness; excessive drowsiness; fainting; fatigue; hallucinations; muscle rigidity; seizures; shock (changes in skin color); slow heartbeat; respiratory depression or slowed breathing; trouble breathing and feeling of weakness.

Advantages to patients: If effective, less pain during and after the cystoscopic procedure and better tolerance of the procedure.

Advantages to humanity: If effective, nasal fentanyl could be used as a means to reduce pain before and during cystoscopic procedures.

These benefits may not happen and unexpected side effects may develop.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Torrance, California, United States, 90502
        • Harbor UCLA Medical Center Urology Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Urological indications for cystoscopic procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of analgesia abuse or former opioid addiction.
  2. Allergy to fentanyl.
  3. Acute/chronic nasal problems such as rhinitis or sinusitis.
  4. Positive urine pregnancy test / lactation.
  5. Acute bronchial asthma / upper airway obstruction.
  6. Presence of bradycardia or a history of seizures.
  7. Concomitant use of drugs that inhibit CYP3A4 (e.g., ritonavir, ketoconazole, itraconazole, troleandomycin, clarithromycin, nelfinavir, nefazodone, amprenavir, aprepitant, diltiazem, erythromycin, fluconazole, fosamprenavir, MAO inhibitors and verapamil)
  8. 0-10 NRS pain score more than 3 on baseline.
  9. Any situation or condition which, in the investigator's opinion, puts the subject at significant risk, or could confound the study results.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fentanyl
Subjects will receive either 0.5mL or 1 mL of intranasal fentanyl (50mcg or 100mcg)
100 mcg in 1 mL intranasal spray
Other Names:
  • fentanyl citrate
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Subjects will receive either 0.5mL or 1 mL of intranasal saline as placebo.
Sodium Chloride 0.9% intranasal spray
Other Names:
  • normal saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pre Procedure 0 - 10 Pain Numerical Rating Scale
Time Frame: Pre procedure, During procedure, Post procedure

The NRS pain assessment (0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain) is recorded as outlined below:

1. baseline pain score at admission, when the subject checks in, 2 Upon entry of the cystoscope into the urethral meatus, 3. and thirty minutes after the cystoscopic procedure has been completed.

Pre procedure, During procedure, Post procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
O2 Saturation Post Drug Administration
Time Frame: Baseline, 5 minutes 10 minutes and 30 minutes post drug-administration.
After administration of the study drug, the subject is monitored (oxygen saturation), for any signs of respiratory depression or the presence of complications or side-effects including apnea or oxygen desaturation.
Baseline, 5 minutes 10 minutes and 30 minutes post drug-administration.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 16, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 20, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Fentanyl

3
Subscribe