A Comparison of the Drug Therapy Versus Re-Ablation

October 16, 2012 updated by: Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation

Progression of Atrial Fibrillation After a Failed Initial Ablation Procedure in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Comparison of the Drug Therapy Versus Re-Ablation

The hypothesis of this study was that early re-ablation (test) was superior to AAD therapy (control) in patients with previous failed PVI ablation for paroxysmal AF.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

154

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Russian Federation
      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630055
        • State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • history of symptomatic PAF

Exclusion Criteria:

  • congestive heart failure
  • LV ejection fraction < 35%
  • left atrial diameter > 60 mm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: AAD therapy
Recurrent episodes were pharmacologically managed by conventional AAD therapy (propafenone, flecainide, and/or sotalol as first-line drugs in patients without structural heart disease or amiodarone as a single drug or in combination in patients with structural heart disease or in case of first-line drug failure) according to AF management guidelines.
Drug: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents (propafenone, flecainide, and/or sotalol, or amiodarone)
propafenone, flecainide, and/or sotalol as first-line drugs in patients without structural heart disease or amiodarone as a single drug or in combination in patients with structural heart disease or in case of first-line drug failure
Procedure: ILR implantation

The Reveal XT was implanted in the parasternal area of the chest. The requirement for defining the exact final position was an R-wave amplitude ≥0.4 mV assessed through the Vector Check.

Patients were provided with the Patient Assistant, a tool that allows each patient to store the ECG through the implanted device during symptoms; data were collected in order to analyze heart rhythm during symptomatic events.
Active Comparator: re-ablation procedure

Reisolation of the PVs was performed by identifying the breakthrough site on the mapping catheter (NaviStar ThermoCool, Biosense-Webster Inc., Diamond Bar, CA). RF energy was delivered at 43°C, 35 W, 0.5 cm away from the PV ostia at the anterior wall, and was reduced to 43°C, 30 W, 1 cm away from the PV ostia at the posterior wall, with a saline irrigation rate of 17 mL/min. Each lesion was ablated continuously until the local potential amplitude decreased by >80% or RF energy deliveries exceeded 40 s.

The endpoint of ablation was complete PVI; this was confirmed when Lasso catheter mapping showed the disappearance of all PV potentials or the dissociation of PV potentials from LA activity. Only in patients with induced left atrial flutter, additional RF ablation lines were created by connecting the left inferior PV to the mitral annulus (mitral isthmus) and the roof of the LA between the two superior PVs.
Procedure: ILR implantation

The Reveal XT was implanted in the parasternal area of the chest. The requirement for defining the exact final position was an R-wave amplitude ≥0.4 mV assessed through the Vector Check.

Patients were provided with the Patient Assistant, a tool that allows each patient to store the ECG through the implanted device during symptoms; data were collected in order to analyze heart rhythm during symptomatic events.

Procedure: re-ablation procedure
Reisolation of the PVs was performed by identifying the breakthrough site on the mapping catheter (NaviStar ThermoCool, Biosense-Webster Inc., Diamond Bar, CA). RF energy was delivered at 43°C, 35 W, 0.5 cm away from the PV ostia at the anterior wall, and was reduced to 43°C, 30 W, 1 cm away from the PV ostia at the posterior wall, with a saline irrigation rate of 17 mL/min. Each lesion was ablated continuously until the local potential amplitude decreased by >80% or RF energy deliveries exceeded 40 s. The endpoint of ablation was complete PVI; this was confirmed when Lasso catheter mapping showed the disappearance of all PV potentials or the dissociation of PV potentials from LA activity.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
progression of AF (AF burden progression and persistent AF)
Time Frame: 3 year
3 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia, including AF and atrial flutter/tachycardia
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
number of further ablation
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
predictors of AF progression
Time Frame: 3 years
AF burden by ILR monitoring
3 years
complications
Time Frame: 3 years
  • tamponade
  • pulmonary vein stenosis
  • atrio-esophora fistula (for re-ablation arm)
  • ventricular arrhythmia
  • symptomatic bradycardia (for AAD arm)
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Evgeny Pokushalov, MD, PhD, State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 18, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 18, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2012

Last Verified

October 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PAF-DT-RA

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Anti-Arrhythmia Agents (propafenone, flecainide, and/or sotalol, or amiodarone)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Dominican Republic

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe