Cognitive Training in Children With Attention Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

April 26, 2017 updated by: Aida Bikic, Region Syddanmark

A Study of the Efficacy of Computerized Cognitive Training on Cognitive Function, Symptoms and Functional Outcome in Children With ADHD.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of computer program C8 on specific cognitive functions, symptoms and functional outcome compared to treatment as usual in children with ADHD. Furthermore, if the effect is sustained 12 and 24 weeks after training. In addition, it will be investigated, whether younger children benefit more from training than older children.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aabenraa, Denmark, 6200
        • Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services Aabenraa
      • Augustenborg, Denmark, 6440
        • Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services Augustenborg
      • Kolding, Denmark, 6000
        • Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services Kolding

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 13 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ADHD- diagnosis
  2. age 6-13 years
  3. Patient has access to computer og internet from home
  4. Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Comorbidity: conduct disorder, autism spectrum disorders, depression, or schizophrenia
  2. Head trauma or neurological disease
  3. Intelligence quotient (IQ) < 80
  4. Motoric or perceptual handicap
  5. Medical disease requiring treatment
  6. No informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Computer program C8 + treatment as usual
Computer program C 8 + treatment as usual. Subjects in the intervention group will be playing a special computer program C8 for 40 min a day, 6 times a week for 8 weeks in addition to treatment as usual.
Experimental: Computer program C8 + treatment as usual: Playing a special computer program C8 40 min a day for 6 days a week for 8 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Cognitive training
  • C8
  • ADHD
Treatment as usual at the clinic
Other Names:
  • TAU
Other: Treatment as usual
Treatment as usual at the clinic
Treatment as usual at the clinic
Other Names:
  • TAU

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB): Rapid Visual Information Processing probability of hit.
Time Frame: Assesment after the 8 week intervention
Assesment after the 8 week intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions (BRIEF)
Time Frame: After the 8 week intervention
After the 8 week intervention
ADHD-Rating scale
Time Frame: After the 8 week intervention
After the 8 week intervention
CANTAB: Attention Switching Task (AST)
Time Frame: After the 8 week intervention
After the 8 week intervention
Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB): Rapid Visual Information Processing
Time Frame: After 8 weeks of intervention
After 8 weeks of intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
CANTAB: Match to sample: visual search.
Time Frame: After 8 weeks of intervention
After 8 weeks of intervention
CANTAB: Choice reaction time.
Time Frame: After 8 weeks of intervention
After 8 weeks of intervention
CANTAB: Stop Signal Task.
Time Frame: After 8 weeks of intervention
After 8 weeks of intervention
CANTAB: Spatial Working Memory
Time Frame: After the 8 weeks of intervention
After the 8 weeks of intervention
CANTAB: Stockings of Cambridge.
Time Frame: After the 8 weeks of intervention
After the 8 weeks of intervention
CANTAB: Paired Associates Learning.
Time Frame: After 8 weeks of intervention
After 8 weeks of intervention
Weis function scale
Time Frame: After 8 weeks of intervention
After 8 weeks of intervention
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions (BRIEF)
Time Frame: 12 weeks follow up
12 weeks follow up
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions (BRIEF)
Time Frame: 24 week follow up
24 week follow up
ADHD-Rating scale
Time Frame: 12 week follow up
12 week follow up
ADHD-Rating scale
Time Frame: 24 week follow up
24 week follow up
CANTAB: Attention Switching Task (AST)
Time Frame: 12 week follow up
12 week follow up
CANTAB: Attention Switching Task (AST)
Time Frame: 24 week follow up
24 week follow up
CANTAB: Match to sample: visual search.
Time Frame: 12 week follow up
12 week follow up
CANTAB: Match to sample: visual search.
Time Frame: 24 week follow up
24 week follow up
CANTAB: Choice reaction time.
Time Frame: 12 weeks follow up
12 weeks follow up
CANTAB: Choice reaction time.
Time Frame: 24 week follow up
24 week follow up
CANTAB: Stop Signal Task.
Time Frame: 12 weeks follow up
12 weeks follow up
CANTAB: Stop Signal Task.
Time Frame: 24 week follow up
24 week follow up
CANTAB: Spatial Working Memory
Time Frame: 12 week follow up
12 week follow up
CANTAB: Spatial Working Memory
Time Frame: 24 week follow up
24 week follow up
CANTAB: Stockings of Cambridge.
Time Frame: 12 weeks follow up
12 weeks follow up
CANTAB: Stockings of Cambridge.
Time Frame: 24 weeks follow up
24 weeks follow up
Weis function scale
Time Frame: 12 week follow up
12 week follow up
Weis function scale
Time Frame: 24 week follow up
24 week follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aida Bikic, Ph.D, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services
  • Study Chair: Søren Dalsgaard, MD, Ph.D., Department of Economics and Business - CIRRAU - Centre for Integrated Register-based Research, Aarhus University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

December 19, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • S-20120096

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ADHD

Clinical Trials on Computer program C8

Subscribe