Spine Biomechanics During Gait Following Lower Extremity Treatment in Different Patient Groups

August 24, 2018 updated by: Prof. Reinald Brunner, MD, University Children's Hospital Basel

The Measurement of Spine Dynamics During Gait for the Quantification of Intervention Outcomes in Patients With Different Pathologies

Measuring spine dynamics is a necessity in order to better understand gait deviations throughout the whole body and to evaluate treatment effects on spinal movement during gait. However, the full body marker sets that are typically used in opto-electronic 3D gait analyses either disregard the spine entirely or regard it as a rigid structure. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to use an enhanced trunk marker set in order to evaluate the biomechanical effects of lower extremity treatments on spine dynamics in patients with different pathologies.

It has been hypothesized that

  1. the enhanced trunk marker set is a reliable method for the measurement of spine dynamics during gait in patients with deviations occurring secondary to leg length inequality.
  2. the enhanced trunk marker set is a reliable method for the measurement of spine dynamics during gait in patients that present both primary and secondary deviations such as seen in hemiplegic and diplegic cerebral palsy.
  3. treatment by means of either a shoe insole or a modified shoe with sole lift on the shorter side has an effect on spine dynamics during gait in patients with leg length inequality.
  4. treatment by means of an ankle foot orthosis to control the foot position has an effect on spine dynamics during gait in patients with hemiplegic and diplegic cerebral palsy.

To verify the hypotheses, instrumented gait analyses with a standard full body marker set and the enhanced trunk marker set will be carried out before and immediately after an orthotic lower extremity treatment in the respective patient group.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Basel, Switzerland, 4056
        • University Children's Hospital Basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Leg length inequality patients:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed structural leg length inequality (minimum 1% of body height)
  • Several different aetiologies (except neurological)
  • Able to walk a distance of minimum 50 meters without any assistive device

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Leg length inequality due to neurological aetiology
  • Structural deformities of the spine
  • Obesity (> 95th BMI-per-age percentile)
  • Injuries of the locomotor system which led to persistent deformities

Hemiplegic cerebral palsy patients:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed hemiplegic cerebral palsy (Gross Motor Function Classification System for Cerebral Palsy (GMFCS): Levels I and II)
  • Able to walk a distance of minimum 50 meters barefoot and without any assistive device

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Structural deformities of the spine
  • Any previous surgical and casting treatments as well as botulinumtoxin treatments within preceding 6 months.
  • Obesity (> 95th BMI-per-age percentile)
  • Injuries of the locomotor system which led to persistent deformities

Diplegic cerebral palsy patients:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed diplegic cerebral palsy (Gross Motor Function Classification System for Cerebral Palsy (GMFCS): Levels I and II)
  • Able to walk a distance of minimum 50 meters barefoot and without any assistive device

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Structural deformities of the spine
  • Any previous surgical and casting treatments as well as botulinumtoxin treatments within preceding 6 months.
  • Obesity (> 95th BMI-per-age percentile)
  • Injuries of the locomotor system which led to persistent deformities

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Leg length correction
The shorter leg in a sample of 15 patients with structural leg length inequality will be corrected by either a shoe insole or a modified shoe with sole lift.
The heel of the shorter leg of the patient is lifted by a shoe insole. This procedure is commonly applied with leg length differences of up to 20mm.
The heel of the shorter leg of the patient is lifted by building up the sole of the shoe (shoe sole lift). This procedure is commonly applied with leg length differences of 20mm and more.
Experimental: Control of foot position 1
The foot position in in a sample of 15 patients with hemiplegic cerebral palsy will be controlled by an ankle foot orthosis.
Ankle foot orthoses are a common treatment method to control the foot position during walking and to prevent ankle plantar flexion contractures in cerebral palsy patients.
Experimental: Control of foot position 2
The foot position in in a sample of 15 patients with diplegic cerebral palsy will be controlled by an ankle foot orthosis.
Ankle foot orthoses are a common treatment method to control the foot position during walking and to prevent ankle plantar flexion contractures in cerebral palsy patients.
No Intervention: Control
A sample of 15 healthy controls from a simultaneously conducted study (UKBB-Spine-1315-1) will be used for comparative purposes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reliability of the enhanced trunk marker set for the measurement of spinal kinematics in patients with leg length inequality and cerebral palsy during gait.
Time Frame: Data will be collected between April 2013 and June 2015. Each patient will be measured before and immediately after an orthotic treatment (both measurements within 1 hour).
Parameters include lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine curvature angles in the sagittal and frontal planes and segmental rotation angles in the transverse plane.
Data will be collected between April 2013 and June 2015. Each patient will be measured before and immediately after an orthotic treatment (both measurements within 1 hour).
Immediate changes in spinal kinematics in patients with leg length inequality and cerebral palsy during gait following an orthotic lower extremity treatment.
Time Frame: Data will be collected between April 2013 and June 2015. Each patient will be measured before and immediately after the orthotic treatment (both measurements within 1 hour).
Parameters include lumbar, thoracic and cervical spine curvature angles in the sagittal and frontal planes and segmental rotation angles in the transverse plane.
Data will be collected between April 2013 and June 2015. Each patient will be measured before and immediately after the orthotic treatment (both measurements within 1 hour).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Immediate changes in spatio-temporal gait parameters and kinematics and kinetics of peripheral joints in patients with leg length inequality and cerebral palsy during gait following an orthotic lower extremity treatment.
Time Frame: Data will be collected between April 2013 and June 2015. Each patient will be measured before and immediately after the orthotic treatment (both measurements within 1 hour).
Parameters include gait speed, cadence and single and double limb support as well as angles, torques and powers of peripheral joints in all three planes.
Data will be collected between April 2013 and June 2015. Each patient will be measured before and immediately after the orthotic treatment (both measurements within 1 hour).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

March 4, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on Shoe insole

Subscribe