Impact of an Online Positive Affect Journaling Intervention

July 9, 2014 updated by: Christopher Sciamanna, MD, MPH, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
In this study the investigators plan to recruit 70 patients reporting high levels of stress to test the impact of Positive Affect Journaling. Patients randomized to use the online intervention will be asked to journal about one of seven topics, several days each week, for three months. The topics (e.g., "What went well") are designed to help the individual focus on some positive aspect of their life or themselves over the past day. Each topic is based on prompts shown to be effective in studies of up to one week in duration. In the summer of 2012, our research team pilot tested each prompt with 20 patients with high levels of anxiety, which led to important changes to the prompts, to increase their potential impact. The main aim is to understand the impact of Positive Affect Journaling on psychological distress, as measured by the National Health Interview Survey.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Penn State Hershey Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fluently speaks, writes, and read English
  • Report elevated levels of stress
  • Be between 21-80 years of age
  • Have access to the Internet
  • Have an ECOG Performance Status of 0 (Fully active) through 3 (Limited self-care)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High risk for suicidality on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID).
  • Pregnant or planning to get pregnant in the next 3 months
  • Moving in the next 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Participants in the intervention condition will be asked to write for 15 minutes on three days each week to one of the seven positive affect writing prompts on www.stressvax.com. Subjects who do not complete a journal entry within 7 days will receive an email reminder, in case they have lost their password or have some technical problem accessing the site.
No Intervention: Control
As there is no clinical standard of care treatment for psychological distress, patients randomized into this condition will receive their usual care. At the end of three months, subjects in this condition will be given access to the positive affect journaling intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
National Health Interview Survey
Time Frame: 3 month follow up
The NHIS measures perceived levels of stress over the past 12 months.
3 month follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brief Resilience Scale
Time Frame: 3 month follow up
The BRS is a 6-item self-report measure of perceived resilience, including items such as "It does not take me long to recover from a stressful event" The BRS has high levels of internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha ranging from .80-.91
3 month follow up
Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: 3 month follow up
The PSS consists of 10 items that assess perceived stress. The items are scored on a 4-point scale (45). The measure demonstrates strong internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of .88
3 month follow up
Satisfaction with Life scale
Time Frame: 3 month follow up
The SWL is a five-item scale that assesses overall life satisfaction. The SWL has a 2-month test-retest reliability of 0.82 and a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87
3 month follow up
Social Provisions Scale
Time Frame: 3 month follow up
The SPS assesses the extent to which one perceives their social relationships to be supportive. This 24-item measure has a Cronbach's alpha of 0.91
3 month follow up
Healthy Days score
Time Frame: 3 month follow up
Created by the Centers for Disease Control, this measure assesses the number of days of poor mental health, physical health, poor sleep and other symptoms, as well as overall health
3 month follow up
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule score
Time Frame: 3 month follow up
The 20-item PANAS consists of two subscales, in which respondents indicate the extent to which they felt specific positive and negative emotions over a specific time frame. Internal consistencies are high (Crohnbach's alpha = 0.85-0.88)
3 month follow up
Cancer Quality of Life
Time Frame: 3 month follow up
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients.
3 month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Sciamanna, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 10, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 10, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 41160EP

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress

Clinical Trials on Positive Affect Journaling

3
Subscribe