A Trial of EBUS-TBNA Versus Conventional TBNA in Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis

December 26, 2014 updated by: Ritesh Agarwal, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
The investigators hypothesize that conventional or EBUS-TBNA will have equal efficiency in diagnosing sarcoidosis when performed in conjunction with endobronchial and transbronchial lung biopsy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Diagnostic procedures like transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB), transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) and endobronchial biopsy (EBB) are routinely used to obtain pathological confirmation of pulmonary sarcoidosis. Real-time convex probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided TBNA (EBUS-TBNA) has shown immense potential, however it is costly, labor intensive and still has limited availability, especially in low and middle income countries. In the past, TBLB has been the bronchoscopic procedure of choice for diagnosis of sarcoidosis however currently its role is being debated with the advent of EBUS. We have observed that EBUS even though has high yield yet the optimal diagnosis is obtained only when combined with EBB and TBLB. The investigators hypothesize that conventional or EBUS-TBNA will have equal efficiency in diagnosing sarcoidosis when performed in conjunction with endobronchial and transbronchial lung biopsy.

The study compares the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA (plus EBB and TBLB) vs. conventional TBNA (plus EBB and TBLB) for diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chandigarh, India, 160012
        • Chest clinic, PGIMER

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 75 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Consecutive patients presenting with clinicoradiological features suggestive of sarcoidosis and an indication for transbronchial needle aspiration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Hypoxemia (SpO2 <90%) on room air
  • Poor lung function (forced expiratory volume in first second [FEV1] <1L)
  • Patients with deranged clotting profile (prothrombin time >3 seconds above control; activated partial thromboplastin time >10 seconds above control, platelet count <50000/µL)
  • Patients already initiated on glucocorticoids
  • Diagnosis of sarcoidosis possible on minimally invasive techniques such as skin biopsy or peripheral lymph node biopsy and failure to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EBUS-TBNA
EBUS-TBNA (with endobronchial and transbronchial lung biopsy)
Mediastinal and hilar lymph node aspiration using endobronchial ultrasound
Endobronchial and transbronchial lung biopsy using flexible bronchoscopy
Active Comparator: Conventional TBNA
Conventional TBNA (with endobronchial and transbronchial lung biopsy)
Endobronchial and transbronchial lung biopsy using flexible bronchoscopy
Mediastinal and hilar lymph node aspiration using blind transbronchial needle aspiration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic yield
Time Frame: 18 months
The primary outcome is the diagnostic yield of the procedure defined as demonstration of granulomatous inflammation in two groups in patients finally labelled as sarcoidosis
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety
Time Frame: 18 months
Occurrence of serious adverse events (pneumothorax, bleeding >100 ml, death) in the two groups
18 months
Diagnostic yield of individual sampling techniques
Time Frame: 18 months
To study the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA, conventional TBNA, TBLB and EBB
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 26, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 30, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1Trg/PG-2012/12563-601

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcoidosis

Clinical Trials on EBUS-TBNA

Subscribe