Reducing Offenders' HIV Risk: MI Enhanced Case Management With Drug-Free Housing

June 18, 2018 updated by: Public Health Institute, California
The goal of the study is to see if a Motivational Interviewing Case Management (MICM) intervention will improve outcomes for respondents who are on probation or parole, at risk for HIV and have recently entered a Sober Living House. The MICM will help respondents access needed services, adapt to their new living environment, find and maintain work, address HIV risk and treatment, and manage setbacks. The risk for HIV infection among criminal justice offenders is significant, as is the need for stable, drug free housing in this population. Our aim is to see if the MICM intervention in the context of drug free housing will improve health outcomes and reduce recidivism.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is based on the premise that probationers and parolees must have access to stable, drug-free housing to reduce HIV risk, access needed services and avoid rearrests and reincarceration. Drug-free housing at the Sober Living Network (SLN) in California are being studied as a way to provide a positive living environment for probationers and parolees. The houses use a sober living house (SLH) model of recovery that includes a communal recovery environment, abstinence from drugs and alcohol, peer support, and encouragement to attend self-help groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous.

The proposed study will improve SLHs for offenders by adding a Motivational Interviewing Case Management (MICM) intervention specifically targeted to the problems presented by each offender. The list of potential problems that MICM can address is extensive: 1) adapting to the SLH environment, 2) complying with parole and probation, 3) finding and maintain work, 4) successfully accessing and maintaining retention in services, 5) addressing HIV risk, testing and treatment, 6) mobilizing personal and informal resources, and 7) managing setbacks (e.g., relapse, loss of housing, loss of work).

Men and women involved with the criminal justice system (N=330) entering SLHs will be assigned to a condition consisting of a provision of a resources manual where residents can seek help for a variety of problems (a control group) or the MICM (intervention).To avoid mixing individuals who receive the intervention with individuals who do not within the same house, houses are randomized at the house level. Once a house is randomized to a study condition, all of the individuals recruited from that house receive the same intervention, MICM or SLH as usual. To avoid contamination of study conditions by gender, randomization procedures are stratified by houses for men, women, and both genders. Research interviews are conducted at baseline (within one month of entering the houses), 6 months, and 12 months. Follow-up interviews are conducted whether or not the participant leaves the SLH and at a site that is the most comfortable for the participant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

330

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Emeryville, California, United States, 94608
        • Alcohol Research Group

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be 18 years or older
  • Speak English
  • Entered the sober living house in the last month
  • Able to provide contact info for followups
  • Willing to attend MICM sessions
  • On probation or parole
  • ONE of the following: tested positive for HIV, injected drugs, sex work history, men who have sex with men (MSM), or women who have had unprotected sex in the last month with multiple partners

Exclusion Criteria:

  • serious mental health disorder that would hinder their ability to provide informed consent or otherwise participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Motivational interviewing case management
MICM intervention combines aspects of motivational interviewing along with case management to influence HIV risk and recovery from alcohol and drug problems. Participants assigned to the MICM condition will be contacted to receive 3 individual sessions within the first 4 weeks of entering the study. Thereafter they will have contact with the MICM therapist monthly throughout the duration of their enrollment in the study (12 months).
Other: Resource referrals
Respondents will receive SLH services as usual along with a list of resources that can be used to address a variety of problems.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Criminal Justice Outcomes
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Measured by dichotomous measure of whether or not any time spent incarcerated in past 6 months.56 follow-up interviews were conducted in jails, when allowed and the participant was comfortable, but we did not conduct interviews in prison. See participant flow for number of participants in prison.
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Change in Alcohol and Drug Use (Timeline Follow Back)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Measured by whether or not the participant reports complete abstinence from all substance use for last 6 months on Timeline Followback (TLFB).
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Change in Worries About HIV in Past 6 Months.
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Measured by whether or not the participant was worried about HIV in past 6 months.
Baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Doug Polcin, Ed.D, Alcohol Research Group / Public Health Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1R01DA034973-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • R01DA034973-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol and Drug Abuse

Clinical Trials on Motivational interviewing case management

3
Subscribe