The Effects of Simulation-based Ultrasound Training on Continuity of Care in Managing Pre-mature Onset of Labor

May 4, 2015 updated by: Martin G. Tolsgaard, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Simulation-based training lead to improvements in learning compared to no intervention but little is known of the effects on organizational improvements that are relevant to patient care. This study focused on the effects of training midwives in performing cervical ultrasound scans on continuity of care when managing pregnant women with symptoms of premature onset of labor. Our hypothesis is that simulation-based training can be used to decrease the number of shifts in primary responsible health care practitioner as midwives that are trained in cervical ultrasound scans may manage the patient encounter without engaging a second practitioner (i.e. an obstetrician).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Pregnant women with symptoms of premature onset of labor are typically managed by midwives and obstetricians but shifts in responsibility in patient care may result in lack of continuity of care. This may, in turn, result in threats to patient safety and delays in initiation of treatment due to long wait times.

This study examined the effects of simulation-based ultrasound training on the management of women with symptoms of pre-mature onset of labor. 12 midwives were randomized to simulation-based ultrasound training focusing on cervical assessment or no training (controls). The midwives in the intervention group were trained to an expert criterion on a high-fidelity transvaginal ultrasound simulator. Once this level was attained, they continued clinical training until proficiency in performing cervical scans independently. Proficiency was determined using a previously validated assessment instrument (the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills) and by sending in pictures for the Fetal Medicine Foundation certification programme.

The number of responsible health care practitioners providing care for pregnant women with acute onset of symptoms of premature onset of labor is registered along with time from arrival at the hospital to medical assessment and treatment is commenced. Differences between patients treated by the two groups of midwives are compared over a period of 6 months. During this period all patients with symptoms of premature onset of labor are included, of which only a small proportion are admitted for further examinations and treatment. The vast majority are expected to be scheduled for ambulatory follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Capital Region
      • Hillerød, Capital Region, Denmark, 3400
        • Nordsjællands Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All midwives who are taking shift on the maternity ward

Exclusion Criteria:

Any prior ultrasound training and planned maternity leave.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Simulation-based training
Simulation-based training to an expert criterion followed by clinical training until proficiency and certification.
Other Names:
  • Simulation-based training on a high-fidelity ultrasound simulator (Scantrainer, Medaphor) and subsequently on a low-fidelity mannequin (BluePhantom, CAE).
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
No training is provided the control group participants.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Continuity of care
Time Frame: Patients will be followed untill discharge from the hospital, which is expected to be an average of 6 hours
Continuity of care is evaluated by registering the number of health care practitioners involved in patient management.
Patients will be followed untill discharge from the hospital, which is expected to be an average of 6 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wait times
Time Frame: An average of 6 hours is expected.
Wait times for pregnant women with symptoms of premature onset of labor are registered and compared between the two groups of midwives, who are responsible for the initial patient care and -contact.
An average of 6 hours is expected.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martin G Tolsgaard, MD, PhD, CEKU

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 5, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 5, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H-4-2013-FSP 10 (OTHER: Regional Ethical Committee of the Capital Region, Denmark)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Continuity of Care

Clinical Trials on Simulation-based training

Subscribe