Comparison of a Single Use (Ambu aScope) and a Reusable Flexible Optical Scope for Intubation Through a Supraglottic Airway Device (Aura-i)

May 20, 2014 updated by: Michael Seltz Kristensen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

A Comparison Between Flexible Single Use Endoscopes (Ambu aScopes) and Reusable Flexible Endoscopes Used as a Standard of Car When Intubation the Trachea Via an Aura-I Supraglottic Airway Device

In patient who are predicted to be difficult to intubate with a standard direct laryngoscope well use flexible optical intubation via a supraglottic airway devise (the Ambu Aura-i). Patients are randomly assigner to a single- or a multiple- use flexible optical scope.

We hypothesize that intubation is obtained equally effective with both types of flexible scopes

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Recruiting
        • Rigshospitalet, Denmark
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael S Kristensen, M.D.
      • Strasbourg, France, 67098
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Service d'anesthesie-reanimation 1 avenue Moliere Hopiatl de Hautepierre
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pierre Diemunsch, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA physical status 1-3 and evaluated pre-operatively and found suitable for tracheal intubation with a flexible optical scope via the SAD and scheduled for elective surgery/anesthesia and are conscious about their rights and consequences of participating in the study.
  • The patient must have one or two of the following predictors of difficult tracheal intubation:

    1. Modified Mallampati score > 2 (= "no parts of the Uvula is visible")
    2. a thyromental distance of less then or equal to 6.5 cms
    3. Combined movement in head and neck < 90 degrees
    4. Mouth-opening less the 4 cm (but must be larger then 2.5 cm)
    5. Inability to protrude the teeth n the lower jaw beyond the upper incisors
    6. BMI > 40 combined with a neck-circumference > 43 cms
    7. Upper-lip-bite-test > 2
    8. Previous difficult intubation or laryngoscopy (If more then two criteria are fulfilled the patient should be considered intubated awake instead. . But the upper-lip-bite-test and the prognation-beyond the incisors test represents a similar thing, namely the inability to sub-luxate the lower jaw, the if both these findings are positive it is only considered as counting for one.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA physical status 4 or 5
  • contraindications for use of the SAD
  • Patients in whom intubation via a SAD has previously failed
  • Patients at risk of aspiration from the gastrointestinal channel
  • diseases in mouth, pharynx or larynx that precludes the use of a SAD
  • Patients in whom the cricothyroid membrane cannot be localized preanaesthetically
  • Patients in whom the doctor making the pre-anaesthetic evaluation finds in need of an awake intubation
  • Patients with possible Creutzfeldt-Jacobs disease or contraindication against the use of non-autoclavable equipment r risk of cross contamination with prions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Single use flexible optical scope
Single use flexible optical scope , Ambu aScope
Active Comparator: Multiple use flexible optical scope

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Duration of intubation. From the endoscope enters the supraglottic-airway-device to CO2-curve is seen
Time Frame: Measured during tracheal intubation at induction of anesthesia
Measured during tracheal intubation at induction of anesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of attempts at placing the supraglottic-airway-device (SAD)
Time Frame: From anesthesia induction and the following 10 minutes during securing of the airway
an attempt is defined as the tip of the SAD passing the upper front teeth
From anesthesia induction and the following 10 minutes during securing of the airway
number of attempts at placing the flexible endoscope in the trachea
Time Frame: From anesthesia induction and the following 10 minutes
From anesthesia induction and the following 10 minutes
number of attempts at intubation
Time Frame: From anesthesia induction and during the following 10 minutes during airway management
An intubation attempt starts when the tip of the endotracheal tube passes the entrance to the SAD
From anesthesia induction and during the following 10 minutes during airway management
Total time for placement of SAD and endoscopy and intubation
Time Frame: During induction of anesthesia and the following 10 minutes during airway management
During induction of anesthesia and the following 10 minutes during airway management
The best glottic view obtained
Time Frame: After anesthesia induction and during the following 10 minutes during airway management
After anesthesia induction and during the following 10 minutes during airway management
The ease of passage of the flexible endoscope via the SAD
Time Frame: During induction and airway management
During induction and airway management
The anesthesiologists' satisfaction with the procedure
Time Frame: During induction of anesthesia and within the 30 minutes hereafter
During induction of anesthesia and within the 30 minutes hereafter
The quality of the endoscopically obtained image
Time Frame: During induction of anesthesia and the following 10 minutes during airway management
During induction of anesthesia and the following 10 minutes during airway management
Postoperative sore throat, dysphonia or dysphagia one hour after extubation
Time Frame: AT the time 1 hour after extubation of the trachea
AT the time 1 hour after extubation of the trachea

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael S Kristensen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 5, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 21, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Journal nr. H-3-2012-001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on General Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on tracheal intubation

Subscribe