Equivalence of A Stable Liquid Glucagon Formulation With Freshly Reconstituted Lyophilized Glucagon

September 17, 2019 updated by: Steven J. Russell, MD, PhD
This study will test the hypothesis that micro-doses of Xerisol Glucagon (Xeris Pharmaceuticals) will be non-inferior by pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic criteria vs. micro-doses of Glucagon for Injection (Eli Lilly).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study will test the hypothesis that micro-doses of a new formulation of stable glucagon, Xerisol Glucagon (Xeris Pharmaceuticals), will be non-inferior by pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic criteria vs. micro-doses of a freshly reconstituted formulation of glucagon that has poor stability in solution, Glucagon for Injection (Eli Lilly).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 21 to 80 years old with type 1 diabetes for at least one year.
  • Diabetes managed using an insulin infusion pump using rapid-acting insulin such as insulin aspart (NovoLog), insulin lispro (Humalog), and insulin glulisine (Apidra) for at least one week prior to enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide informed consent.
  • Unable to comply with study procedures.
  • Current participation in another diabetes-related clinical trial that, in the judgment of the principle investigator, will compromise the results of the clamp study or the safety of the subject.
  • Pregnancy (positive urine HCG), breast feeding, plan to become pregnant in the immediate future, or sexually active without use of contraception.
  • End stage renal disease on dialysis (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis).
  • Hemoglobin < 11.5 gm/dl.
  • History of pheochromocytoma. Fractionated metanephrines will be tested in patients with history increasing the risk for a catecholamine secreting tumor (paroxysms of tachycardia, pallor, or headache; personal or family history of MEN 2A, MEN 2B, neurofibromatosis, or von Hippel-Lindau disease; episodic or treatment of refractory hypertension, defined as requiring 4 or more medications to achieve normotension).
  • History of adverse reaction to glucagon (including allergy) besides nausea, vomiting, or headache.
  • Inadequate venous access as determined by study nurse or physician at time of screening.
  • Liver failure or cirrhosis.
  • Any other factors that, in the judgment of the principal investigator, would interfere with the safe completion of the study procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Xeris glucagon
Xeris glucagon 50 micrograms, subcutaneous injection
The subject is given an injection of xeris glucagon
Active Comparator: Lilly glucagon
Lilly glucagon 30 micrograms, subcutaneous injection
The subject is given an injection of lilly glucagon

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tmax
Time Frame: every 2 minutes for 1 hour post-dose of each glucagon
tmax for Xeris vs. Lilly (non-inferiority)
every 2 minutes for 1 hour post-dose of each glucagon

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AOCGIR
Time Frame: every 2 minutes for 1 hour post-dose of each glucagon
Area over the curve for glucose infusion rate in the hour following administration (AOCGIR) for Xeris vs. Lilly (non-inferiority)
every 2 minutes for 1 hour post-dose of each glucagon
GIRmin
Time Frame: every 2 minutes for 1 hour post-dose of each glucagon
Minimal glucose infusion rate (GIRmin) for Xeris vs. Lilly (non-inferiority)
every 2 minutes for 1 hour post-dose of each glucagon
t½Max
Time Frame: every 2 minutes for 1 hour post-dose of each glucagon
Glucagon t½max for Xeris vs. Lilly (non-inferiority)
every 2 minutes for 1 hour post-dose of each glucagon
Injection Pain
Time Frame: immediately after injection

Quantitation of adverse events related to glucagon injection for Xeris vs. Lilly:

-average Injection pain on a 10 cm standard VAS: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain reported immediately after injection of glucagon

immediately after injection
Injection Site Erythema
Time Frame: within 1 hour of injection

Quantitation of adverse events related to glucagon injection for Xeris vs. Lilly:

-Injection site erythema or other local reaction, maximum diameter within 1 hour of injection

within 1 hour of injection
Maximal Nausea
Time Frame: within 1 hour of injection

Quantitation of adverse events related to glucagon injection for Xeris vs. Lilly:

-Maximal nausea within 1 hour of injection on a 10 cm VAS: no nausea = 0, vomiting = 10

within 1 hour of injection
Dermal Response (Draize Scale for Erythema and Eschar Formation)
Time Frame: within 1 hour of injection
Average grade on the erythema and eschar formation portion of the Draize scale for dermal response (0 being the lowest, 4 being the highest)
within 1 hour of injection
Dermal Response (Draize Scale Grade for Edema Formation)
Time Frame: within 1 hour of injection
Average grade on the edema formation portion of the Draize scale for dermal response (0 being the lowest, 4 being the highest)
within 1 hour of injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 2, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 2, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 23, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 1 Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Xeris glucagon

3
Subscribe