Centralised Anesthesic Monitoring in the Surgery of the Ocular Anterior Segment: Non Inferiority Study (SACHS)

In France, cataract surgery is the most frequent surgical procedure, performed with local anesthesia and most often very light techniques using eye-drops. Technical improvements of surgical and anesthesic procedures have led many countries to implement alternative surveillance procedures. In France, it is mandatory that the persons in charge of anesthetic surveillance (doctors or nurses) should be qualified in anesthesia.

In this study, the investigators aim to assess the feasibility and safety of a centralised monitoring station outside of the operating rooms, as an alternative to the presence of 1 anesthetic nurse in each operating room.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In their hospital, the investigators will study the following alternatives for the anesthetic surveillance of the 3 operating rooms where surgery of the ocular anterior segment is performed: 1) the usual procedure, with the presence of 3 anesthetic nurses (1 in each operating room) and 2) a new organization with an anesthetic nurse checking a centralised monitoring station and a back-up anesthetic nurse ready to intervene inside the 3 operating rooms whenever needed.

The 2 procedures will be successively implemented during 3 to 4 sequences, until the number of surgical procedures statistically required have been studied.

The investigators aim to demonstrate that the centralised monitored surveillance does not put the patients at risk more often than the current surveillance procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

900

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Île-de-France Region
      • Paris, Île-de-France Region, France, 75019
        • Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patient scheduled for ocular anterior segment surgery (cataract, glaucoma, pterygium) with local or topic anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusing to participate in the study or without health insurance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual surveillance
surveillance performed by a qualified nurse, present in the operating room during the whole anesthesia.
Experimental: centralised monitoring surveillance
1 anesthetic nurse is posted at a centralised monitoring station outside of the 3 operating rooms, while another one can intervene inside the 3 operating rooms whenever needed. Interphones allow communication between the monitoring station and the operating rooms.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anesthetic potential impact on surgery conditions
Time Frame: during surgical procedure

Incidence rate of at least 1 of the following events, during surgery:

  • blood pressure > 200 mmHg on 2 consecutive measures (automatic measure every 3 minutes)
  • cardiac frequency < 45/min for at least 1 mn
  • SaO2 <85% for at least 1 mn
  • poor operating conditions (rated ≤ 7 by the surgeon, on a numeric scale from 0 to 10=excellent conditions). Assessment at the exit of operating room.
during surgical procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
interventions of the back-up anesthetic nurse
Time Frame: during surgical procedure
mean number of interventions of the back-up anesthetic nurse during the procedures proportion of surgical procedures requiring at least one intervention of the nurse
during surgical procedure
patient pre-surgical stress
Time Frame: baseline
auto-assessment of stress level using a 0 to 10 (maximum stress) scale
baseline
pain during surgical procedure
Time Frame: within 10 minutes after surgery
retrospective auto-assessment of patient pain using a 0 to 10 (maximum pain) scale
within 10 minutes after surgery
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: within 10 minutes after surgery
auto-assessment of patient satisfaction using a 0 to 10 (fully satisfied) scale
within 10 minutes after surgery
incidence rate of each of the events included in the primary outcome
Time Frame: during surgical procedure
incidence rate of blood pressure > 200 mmHg on 2 consecutive measures (automatic measure every 3 minutes) incidence rate of cardiac frequency < 45/min for at least 1 mn incidence rate of SaO2 <85% for at least 1 mn incidence rate of poor operating conditions (rated < 7 by the surgeon, on a numeric scale from 0 to 10 (excellent conditions)
during surgical procedure
patient agitation
Time Frame: within 10 minutes after surgery
assessed by the surgeon using a 0 to 10 (very agitated) scale
within 10 minutes after surgery
operating conditions
Time Frame: within 10 minutes after surgery
auto-assessment by the surgeon of the operating conditions, on a 0 to 10 (excellent conditions) scale and on a 0 to 10 (completely safe) scale
within 10 minutes after surgery
working conditions
Time Frame: at the end of a working day
auto-assessment of working conditions by the anesthetic nurses, on a 0 to 10 (excellent) scale and on a 0 to 10 (completely safe) scale
at the end of a working day

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
revision surgery
Time Frame: 24 hours after baseline
incidence rate of revision surgery within 24 hours
24 hours after baseline
efficiency of the centralised monitoring of anesthesic surveillance
Time Frame: during surgical procedure
assessment of costs
during surgical procedure
patient baseline pain
Time Frame: baseline
auto-assessment of patient pain before surgery on a 0 to 10 (maximum pain) scale
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Michel DEVYS, MD, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

January 15, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SC_JMD_2013-1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ambulatory Surgical Procedures

Clinical Trials on Health care organization (anesthetic surveillance)

Subscribe