Safety and Efficacy Study of CINRYZE for Prevention of Angioedema Attacks in Children Ages 6-11 With Hereditary Angioedema

May 11, 2021 updated by: Shire

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blind, Dose-Ranging, Crossover Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Administration of CINRYZE® (C1 Esterase Inhibitor [Human]) for the Prevention of Angioedema Attacks in Children 6 to 11 Years of Age With Hereditary Angioedema

Primary Objective - To assess the relative efficacy of two dose levels of CINRYZE (500 Units and 1000 Units) administered by intravenous (IV) injection every 3 or 4 days to prevent angioedema attacks in children 6 to 11 years of age with hereditary angioedema (HAE).

Secondary Objectives - To assess the safety and tolerability, characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), and assess the immunogenicity of two dose levels of CINRYZE administered by IV injection in children 6 to 11 years of age with HAE.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60590
        • Klinikum der J.W. Goethe Universität
      • Mörfelden-Walldorf, Germany, 64546
        • HZRM Hämophilie Zentrum Rhein Main GmbH
      • Tel Aviv, Israel, 64239
        • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
      • Mexico City, Mexico, 04530
        • Instituto Nacional de Pediatría
      • Targu-Mures, Romania, 540072
        • Clinical County Hospital Mures
    • Colorado
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80907
        • Asthma and Allergy Associates, P.C
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89106
        • Nevada Access to Research and Education Society
    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
        • Oregon Allergy Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 11 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Type I or Type II HAE.
  • History of angioedema attacks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of bleeding or clotting abnormality.
  • Diagnosis of acquired angioedema or known to have C1 INH antibodies.
  • History of allergic reaction to C1 esterase inhibitor or other blood products.
  • Receipt of any experimental agents other than those required for prevention or treatment of angioedema attacks within 30 days prior to screening.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 500/1000
500 Units of CINRYZE administered by IV injection twice per week for 12 weeks followed by 1000 Units of CINRYZE administered by IV injection twice per week for 12 weeks
500 Units of CINRYZE administered by IV injection
1000 Units of CINRYZE administered by IV injection
Experimental: 1000/500
1000 Units of CINRYZE administered by IV injection twice per week for 12 weeks followed by 500 Units of CINRYZE administered by IV injection twice per week for 12 weeks
500 Units of CINRYZE administered by IV injection
1000 Units of CINRYZE administered by IV injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Normalized Number of Angioedema Attacks Per Month in a Treatment Period
Time Frame: From start of treatment up to 12 weeks during each treatment period
Angioedema attack was defined as the participant-reported indication of symptoms or signs such as swelling or pain at any location following a report of no swelling or pain on the previous day. Manifestations of an attack that progress from one site to another, prior to complete resolution, was considered a single attack. Attacks that began to regress and then worsened before complete resolution was also considered one attack. Attacks that began then appeared to resolve and then reappeared without a symptom-free calendar day reported after the appearance of resolution were considered 1 attack. Any events of swelling due to trauma or symmetrical nonpainful swelling of the lower extremities were not considered an angioedema attack. The number of attacks was normalized for the number of days participants participated in a given period and expressed as the monthly frequency.
From start of treatment up to 12 weeks during each treatment period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative Attack-severity Score of Angioedema Attacks Normalized Per Month in a Treatment Period
Time Frame: From start of treatment up to 12 weeks during each treatment period
Severity of the angioedema attack sign/symptom was characterized as None: no symptom; Mild: noticeable symptom but easily tolerated by the participant and did not interfere with routine activities; Moderate: symptom interfered with the participant's ability to attend school or participate in family life and social/recreational activities; Severe: symptom significantly limited the participant's ability to attend school or participate in family life and social/recreational activities. Symptom severity score was assigned as Mild = 1, Moderate = 2 and Severe = 3. Cumulative attack severity score was the sum of the maximum symptom severity scores recorded for each angioedema attack in a treatment period. Cumulative attack-severity score normalized per month [(raw score/number of days of participation in that treatment period)*30.4] was reported here. Cumulative attack-severity score normalized per month ranged from 0 to 10.4 and higher scores represent worse symptoms.
From start of treatment up to 12 weeks during each treatment period
Cumulative Daily-severity Score of Angioedema Attacks Normalized Per Month in a Treatment Period
Time Frame: From start of treatment up to 12 weeks during each intervention period
Severity of the angioedema attack sign/symptom was characterized as None: no symptom; Mild: noticeable but easily tolerated by the participant and did not interfere with routine activities; Moderate: interfered with the participant's ability to attend school or participate in family life and social/recreational activities; Severe: significantly limited the participant's ability to attend school or participate in family life and social/recreational activities. Symptom severity score was assigned as Mild = 1, Moderate = 2 and Severe = 3. Cumulative daily-severity score was the sum of the severity scores recorded for every day of reported symptoms in a treatment period. Cumulative daily-severity score normalized per month [(raw score/number of days of participation in that treatment period)*30.4] was reported here. Cumulative daily-severity score normalized per month ranged from 0 to 15.6 and higher scores represent worse symptoms.
From start of treatment up to 12 weeks during each intervention period
Normalized Number of Angioedema Attacks Per Month Requiring Acute Treatment in a Treatment Period
Time Frame: From start of treatment up to 12 weeks during each intervention period
Angioedema attack was defined as the participant-reported indication of symptoms or signs such as swelling or pain at any location following a report of no swelling or pain on the previous day. Manifestations of an attack that progress from one site to another, prior to complete resolution, was considered a single attack. Attacks that began to regress and then worsened before complete resolution was also considered one attack. Attacks that began then appeared to resolve and then reappeared without a symptom-free calendar day reported after the appearance of resolution were considered 1 attack. Any events of swelling due to trauma or symmetrical nonpainful swelling of the lower extremities were not considered an angioedema attack. The number of attacks requiring acute treatment was normalized for the number of days participants participated in a given period and expressed as the monthly frequency.
From start of treatment up to 12 weeks during each intervention period
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Dose Group
Time Frame: From start of study treatment up to 25 weeks
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward, undesired, unplanned clinical event in the form of signs, symptoms, disease, or laboratory or physiological observations occurring in a participant participating in a clinical study with the sponsor's product, regardless of causal relationship. TEAEs were defined as events that started or worsened on or after the date and time of the first dose of investigational product and up to 7 days after the last dose of investigational product.
From start of study treatment up to 25 weeks
Plasma Concentration of C1 Esterase Inhibitor (C1 INH) Antigen
Time Frame: Pre-dose and 1 hour (h) post-dose at Week 1 (Dose 1) and Week 6 (Dose 12); Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h post-dose at Week 12 (Dose 24) of each intervention period
C1 INH antigen concentration in plasma was determined using an automated nephelometric assay.
Pre-dose and 1 hour (h) post-dose at Week 1 (Dose 1) and Week 6 (Dose 12); Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h post-dose at Week 12 (Dose 24) of each intervention period
C1 Esterase Inhibitor (C1 INH) Functional Activity in Plasma
Time Frame: Pre-dose and 1 h post-dose at Week 1 (Dose 1) and Week 6 (Dose 12); Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h post-dose at Week 12 (Dose 24) of each intervention period
The functional activity of C1 INH in plasma samples was determined by a chromogenic assay.
Pre-dose and 1 h post-dose at Week 1 (Dose 1) and Week 6 (Dose 12); Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h post-dose at Week 12 (Dose 24) of each intervention period
Plasma Concentration of Complement C4
Time Frame: Pre-dose and 1 h post-dose at Week 1 (Dose 1) and Week 6 (Dose 12); Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h post-dose at Week 12 (Dose 24) of each intervention period
Concentration of Complement C4 in plasma was determined using an automated nephelometric assay.
Pre-dose and 1 h post-dose at Week 1 (Dose 1) and Week 6 (Dose 12); Pre-dose, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h post-dose at Week 12 (Dose 24) of each intervention period
Number of Participants With C1 Esterase Inhibitor (C1 INH) Antibodies in Plasma
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 1 week post treatment (Week 13, Week 25) and 1 month post treatment follow-up (Week 28)
The presence of C1 INH antibodies in plasma samples was determined using a proprietary enzyme-linked-immunosorbent-assay. Number of participants with C1 INH Antibodies was reported.
Pre-dose, 1 week post treatment (Week 13, Week 25) and 1 month post treatment follow-up (Week 28)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 20, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 4, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 4, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 31, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described in the Data Sharing section of the www.shiretrials.com website. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hereditary Angioedema (HAE)

Clinical Trials on CINRYZE 500

3
Subscribe