High Intensity Interval Exercise in Diastolic Heart Failure

High-intensity Aerobic Interval Training vs. Moderate-intensity Continuous Exercise Training in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure is a major health concern and is the leading cause of hospitalization among elderly Americans. Currently 5.7 million Americans are estimated to have heart failure and the estimated direct and indirect costs of treating heart failure are approximately $37.2 billion. Approximately 40% of those diagnosed with heart failure will have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF). These individuals have significant restrictions in their ability to carry out activities of daily living. Exercise training has been established as adjuvant therapy in heart failure. Although exercise training guidelines for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) are well established, no consensus exercise guidelines exist for management of HFPEF. Aerobic and cardiovascular adaptations are generally greater after high-intensity exercise training; interval-type exercise facilitates this type of training because it allows for rest periods that make it possible for patients with heart failure to perform short (e.g., 1-4 minutes) work periods at intensities that are higher than would be possible during continuous exercise. High-intensity aerobic interval training presents a unique, yet untested, therapeutic modality for the exercise training of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Pilot testing is warranted, results of which may have important implications for reducing cardiovascular risk, increasing short- and long-term quality of life and survival, and reducing healthcare costs in this patient population. The investigators primary specific aim is to determine the efficacy of a novel, high-intensity aerobic interval exercise training program for improving VO2peak (peak oxygen uptake), endothelial function, and arterial stiffness in patients with HFPEF. The investigators secondary aim is to determine whether the vascular changes are correlated with the changes in VO2peak.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Diastolic Heart Failure
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: High intensity interval training; Other: Moderate intensity exercise training

Detailed Description

Heart failure is a major health concern and is the leading cause of hospitalization among elderly Americans. Currently 5.7 million Americans are estimated to have heart failure and the estimated direct and indirect costs of treating heart failure are approximately $37.2 billion. Approximately 40% of those diagnosed with heart failure will have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF).2 These individuals have significant restrictions in their ability to carry out activities of daily living.

Exercise training has been established as adjuvant therapy in heart failure.4 Although exercise training guidelines for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) are well established, no consensus exercise guidelines exist for management of HFPEF. Exercise training increases VO2peak, thus improving prognosis for patients with heart failure. Indeed, VO2peak has been reported to be the single best predictor of mortality in those with cardiac disease.6 Exercise training also improves endothelial function and reduces arterial stiffness, as well as enhancing quality of life.7,8 Because HFPEF is associated with a both diastolic dysfunction and a loss of compensatory systemic vasodilator reserves, arterial stiffness and endothelial function are especially important in this population.

Aerobic and cardiovascular adaptations are generally greater after high-intensity exercise training; interval-type exercise facilitates this type of training because it allows for rest periods that make it possible for patients with heart failure to perform short (e.g., 1-4 minutes) work periods at intensities that are higher than would be possible during continuous exercise. For example, Wisloff et al. demonstrated the superiority of high-intensity aerobic interval training, as compared to continuous, moderate-intensity exercise training, in patients with stable postinfarction heart failure (with reduced ejection fraction). Not only was VO2peak and FMD improved more, patients tolerated the high-intensity program without reported incident. Furthermore, they found it "motivating to have a varied procedure to follow," whereas patients found the continuous exercise group training sessions to be "quite boring." High-intensity aerobic interval training presents a unique, yet untested, therapeutic modality for the exercise training of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Pilot testing is warranted, results of which may have important implications for reducing cardiovascular risk, increasing short- and long-term quality of life and survival, and reducing healthcare costs in this patient population.Patients undergoing exercise training live on average 2.16 years longer at the extremely low cost-effectiveness ratio of $1494 per life year saved.Since the majority of this patient population belongs to the Medicare age group, this intervention has significant potential to reduce healthcare costs.

Hypotheses and Specific Aims Our primary specific aim is to determine the efficacy of a novel, high-intensity aerobic interval exercise training program for improving VO2peak, endothelial function, and arterial stiffness in patients with HFPEF. Our secondary aim is to determine whether the vascular changes are correlated with the changes in VO2peak.

We hypothesize that improvements in VO2peak, endothelial function, and arterial stiffness will be greater after the high-intensity aerobic interval training program and that vascular adaptations will be correlated with changes in VO2peak.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 19
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Arizona
    • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85004
      • Arizona State University
    • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
      • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• HFpEF diagnosis with New York Heart Association heart failure Class II-III symptoms

Exclusion Criteria:

• Unstable angina
• Myocardial infarction in the past 4 weeks
• Uncompensated heart failure
• New York Heart Association class IV symptoms
• Complex ventricular arrhythmias (at rest or during the maximal exercise test)
• Medical or orthopedic conditions that precluded treadmill walking
• Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis
• Acute pulmonary embolus
• Acute myocarditis
• Medication non-compliance

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High intensity interval training; High intensity interval training - 3 days per week at 85-90% peak heart rate (4x4 bouts) for 1 month (12 sessions of exercise)	Other: High intensity interval training; 3 days per week at 85-90% peak heart rate (4x4 bouts) for 1 month (12 sessions of exercise)
Active Comparator: Moderate intensity exercise training; 3 days/week, 30 mins at 70% Peak heart rate for 1 month (12 sessions of exercise)	Other: Moderate intensity exercise training; 3 days/week, 30 mins at 70% Peak heart rate for 1 month (12 sessions of exercise)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction	Measured using left ventricular echocardiography. Diastolic dysfunction is graded as: normal, grade 1, grade 2, grade 3, grade 4. Increasing grade is indicative of worsening LV dysfunction and worse outcomes. Improvement in LV grade is associated with better long term outcomes.	Before and after the 1 month exercise intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
VO2peak	Measured using a graded exercise test (modified Bruce protocol) with 12-lead EKG monitoring and ventilatory gas exchange analysis.	Test carried out before and after the 1 month long exercise intervention.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Brachial Artery Flow-mediated Dilation	Reactive hyperemia mediated brachial artery dilation will be measured after 5 minutes of ischemia with forearm cuff occlusion. Artery will be continuously monitored using B-mode ultrasound.	Before and after 1-month exercise intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Arizona State University
• Collaborators: Mayo Clinic; University of Alberta

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Angadi SS, Mookadam F, Lee CD, Tucker WJ, Haykowsky MJ, Gaesser GA. High-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous exercise training in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pilot study. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015 Sep 15;119(6):753-8. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00518.2014. Epub 2014 Sep 4.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: November 1, 2010
• Primary Completion (Actual): April 1, 2012
• Study Completion (Actual): April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: May 21, 2014
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 27, 2014
• First Posted (Estimate): May 28, 2014

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): April 12, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 10, 2019
• Last Verified: January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Heart Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases; Heart Failure; Heart Failure, Diastolic
• Other Study ID Numbers: Mayo-ArizonaSU Seed 93016001