Predictors of Antidepressant Response

October 31, 2017 updated by: Jon-Kar Zubieta, University of Michigan
Major depression is a highly prevalent, frequently debilitating illness that too often fails to respond to currently available treatments such as antidepressant medication. Furthermore, randomized controlled trials of antidepressants consistently demonstrate large placebo effects. The investigators hypothesize that individual differences in the function of key brain circuits underlie the observed variability in clinical responses to both placebo and antidepressant medication. This study will test this hypothesis by recruiting treatment-seeking volunteers with major depression, with or without comorbid nicotine dependence. Volunteers will participate in positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans in the context of a treatment trial in which they will receive both placebo and antidepressant medication. A major goal of the study is to improve prediction of individual clinical responses in future treatment trials in which brain imaging may be unavailable, and to study the mechanisms of antidepressant response in Major Depression.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

We performed a single-blinded two-week cross-over randomized controlled trial of two identical oral placebos (described as having either potentially "active" fast-acting antidepressant-like effects or to be "inactive") followed by a 10-week open-label treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or in some cases, another agent as clinically indicated. The volunteers were studied with PET and the µ-opioid receptor selective radiotracer [11C]carfentanil after each 1-week "inactive" and "active" oral placebo treatment. In addition, 1 mL of isotonic saline was administered intravenously (i.v.) within sight of the volunteer during PET scanning every 4 min over 20 min only after the 1-week active placebo treatment, with instructions that the compound may be associated with the activation of brain systems involved in mood improvement. This challenge stimulus was utilized to test the individual capacity to acutely activate endogenous opioid neurotransmission under expectations of antidepressant effect.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48108
        • Department of Psychiatry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 58 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Inclusion criteria will include:

  • Participants diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder and will include Hamilton Depressive Rating Scale (HDRS) scores >15

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Comorbid conditions that are medical, neurological or psychiatric, pregnancy, use of hormones (including birth control) or use of psychotropic agents
  • We will only permit certain past anxiety disorder diagnoses, including generalized anxiety, panic, agoraphobia, social phobia
  • We also will exclude left-handed individuals and patients who have used any centrally acting medications or recreational drugs with the past 2 months
  • No history of an implant, pacemaker or pacemaker wires, open heart surgery, artificial heart valve, brain aneurysm surgery, middle ear implant, hearing aid, braces or extensive dental work, cataract surgery or lens implant, implanted mechanical or electrical device, or artificial limb or joint
  • No metallic object in their body (such as braces) or have a history of foreign metallic object in the body such as bullets, BB's, pellets, shrapnel, or other metal fragments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Known Placebo First
This arm gets a placebo that they know is a placebo (called inactive), then has 2 scans performed (FMRI and PET), then a 2-3 day washout, and then gets a so-called "active medication" (which is also actually a placebo), and another pair of scans. Following these, participants receive 10 weeks of open-label antidepressant administration (Celexa or alternative as explained in intervention description). First line antidepressant will be Celexa unless not clinically indicated.
White tablets
Open label s-citalopram, 20 mg start up dose, increasing to 40 mg as clinically indicated; If prior non-response to this medication is noted by the patient, alternative treatments may include another first-line antidepressant:fluoxetine 20 mg; paroxetine up to 60 mg; sertraline up to 200 mg; bupropion up to 300 mg
Other Names:
  • S-citalopram 20-40 mg orally
Blue Capsule
Experimental: "Active" (blinded) Placebo first group
This arm gets a placebo that they don't know is a placebo (called Active), then has 2 scans performed (FMRI and PET), then a 2-3 day washout, and then gets a so-called "inactive medication" (which participants know is a placebo), and another pair of scans. Following these, participants receive 10 weeks of open-label antidepressant administration (Celexa as explained in intervention description). First line antidepressant will be Celexa unless not clinically indicated.
White tablets
Open label s-citalopram, 20 mg start up dose, increasing to 40 mg as clinically indicated; If prior non-response to this medication is noted by the patient, alternative treatments may include another first-line antidepressant:fluoxetine 20 mg; paroxetine up to 60 mg; sertraline up to 200 mg; bupropion up to 300 mg
Other Names:
  • S-citalopram 20-40 mg orally
Blue Capsule

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Mu-opioid Binding Potential During PET
Time Frame: (90 minute PET scans) assessed at Weeks 1 and 2

Binding Potential = Bmax/Kd (receptor concentration/affinity). This is the most common measure of in vivo receptor binding with positron emission tomography. Whole brain changes in mu-opioid receptors binding potential during PET from the Inactive to the Active placebo condition.

Positive numbers presented here represent reductions in binding potential from the inactive to the active condition.

(90 minute PET scans) assessed at Weeks 1 and 2
Changes in BOLD Response During Reward fMRI Task (Monetary Incentive Delay, MID)
Time Frame: (90 minute fMRI scans) assessed at Weeks 1 and 2
% BOLD signal changes in the nucleus accumbens from the Inactive to the Active Placebo condition.
(90 minute fMRI scans) assessed at Weeks 1 and 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Dopamine (D 2/3) Binding Potential During PET.
Time Frame: (90 minute PET scan) assessed at Weeks 1 and 2

Binding Potential= Bmax/Kd (receptor concentration/affinity). This is the most common measure of in vivo receptor binding with PET.

Striatal changes in D2/3 receptor binding potential during PET from the Inactive to the Active condition.

Positive numbers presented here represented reductions in binding potential from the inactive to the active condition.

(90 minute PET scan) assessed at Weeks 1 and 2
Changes From Baseline in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR-16) Score
Time Frame: From Pre to post- active placebo, and from pre to post- inactive placebo (1 week intervention)

This scale is a self-report measure of depression with 16 items.

Questions in the QIDS - SR-116 correlate with the nine DSM-IV symptom criterion domains, Including: Sleep disturbance (initial, middle, and late insomnia or hypersomnia) (Q 1 - 4), Sad mood (Q 5), Decrease/increase in appetite/weight (Q 6 - 9), Concentration (Q 10), Self-criticism (Q 11), Suicidal ideation (Q 12), Interest (Q 13), Energy/fatigue (Q 14), Psychomotor agitation/retardation (Q 15 - 16).

Severity of depression can be judged based on the total score: 1-5= No depression; 6-10= Mild depression; 11-15= Moderate depression; 16-20= Severe depression; 21-27= Very severe depression.

The PHQ-9 and QIDS were used to assess changes in mood during the placebo intervention (first 2 weeks), and therefore results are described as changes from the inactive to the active condition.

From Pre to post- active placebo, and from pre to post- inactive placebo (1 week intervention)
Changes From Baseline in PHQ-9 Depression Scores.
Time Frame: From Pre to post- active placebo, and from pre to post- inactive placebo (1 week intervention)

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9, is a multipurpose instrument for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression, based on participant answers. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represents mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression, respectively. The minimum possible score is 0 and the maximum possible score is 27.

The PHQ-9 and QIDS were used to assess changes in mood during the placebo intervention (first 2 weeks), and therefore results are described as changes from the inactive to the active condition.

From Pre to post- active placebo, and from pre to post- inactive placebo (1 week intervention)
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Scores
Time Frame: Screening, week 0, week 2, week 4, week 8 and week 10

The total score is obtained by summing the score of each item, 0-4 (symptom is absent, mild, moderate, or severe) or 0-2 (absent, slight or trivial, clearly present). For the 17-item version, scores can range from 0 to 54, with 0 meaning no depression, and 54, severe depression.

The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was used to assess symptoms during the open label antidepressant treatment phase, so results are described as mean scores at each bi-weekly visit.

Screening, week 0, week 2, week 4, week 8 and week 10
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: Screening, week 0, week 2, week 4, week 8 and week 10

Designed in 1979 by researchers as an adjunct to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) which would be more sensitive to the changes brought on by antidepressants and other forms of treatment than the Hamilton Scale. MADRS was used to assess symptoms during the open label antidepressant treatment phase, so results are described as mean scores at each bi-weekly visit.

Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression, and each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60 where 0 is no depression and 60 is most extreme depression.

The questionnaire includes questions on the following symptoms 1. Apparent sadness 2. Reported sadness 3. Inner tension 4. Reduced sleep 5. Reduced appetite 6. Concentration difficulties 7. Lassitude 8. Inability to feel 9. Pessimistic thoughts 10. Suicidal thoughts

Usual cutoff points are:

0 to 6 - normal[5] /symptom absent 7 to 19 - mild depression 20 to 34 - moderate depression >34 - severe depression

Screening, week 0, week 2, week 4, week 8 and week 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jon-Kar Zubieta, MD, PhD, University of Michigan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 1, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Placebo, identified as placebo to participants

3
Subscribe