A Study for Improving the Outcome of Childhood Acute Promyeloid Leukemia

A Multicenter and Randomized Prospective Study for Improving the Outcome of Childhood Acute Promyeloid Leukemia

Outcome of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has greatly improved since the introduction of all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA). Treatment with ATRA and anthracycline-based chemotherapy (ATRA + chemotherapy) decreases relapses of the disease as well as early hemorrhagic deaths. Nowadays patients with APL have an event-free survival (EFS) of up to 80%. However, there remains a subset of the patients in whom the disease relapses. Recently, a randomized prospective study showed that the addition of ATO to "ATRA + chemotherapy" treatment protocol had a significantly higher EFS in patients with APL than those treated with "ATRA + chemotherapy" protocol. The patients treated with "ATO + ATRA + chemotherapy" had a five years EFS of 89.2%. Moreover, a recent study showed that Indigo naturalis formula (RIF), a traditional Chinese medicine with tetraarsenic tetrasulfide (As4S4), indirubin, and tanshinone IIA as major active ingredients, yielded synergy in the treatment of a murine APL model in vivo and in the induction of APL cell differentiation in vitro . It is about 20 years since RIF was used to treat ALP in China. Clinical studies showed that this agent was effective against APL. Compared to ATO, RIF is relatively inexpensive and can be taken orally, resulting in reducing the number of hospital days and the treatment cost. However, there is no report comparing treatment outcomes of "ATO + ATRA + chemotherapy" and "RIF + ATRA + chemotherapy" protocols in children with APL so far. For this purpose, therefore, investigators are going to conduct a multicenter and randomized prospective study in children with APL.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES:

  • Determine the safety and efficacy of "ATO/RIF + ATRA + less intensive chemotherapy" protocol in children with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL).
  • Compare the safety,efficacy and treatment cost of "RIF + ATRA + less intensive chemotherapy" with "ATO + ATRA + less intensive chemotherapy" protocol in children with APL. Determine if ATO can be substituted by RIF.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter and randomized prospective study.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 162 patients will be accrued for this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

176

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510080
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 14 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients less than 16 years old with newly diagnosed PML-RARa positive acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have coma, convulsion or paralysis due to intracranial hemorrhage or central nervous system leukemia at diagnosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ATO and chemotherapy

Induction:

ATRA 25mg/m2 d1-CR ≯42 days; ATO 0.16mg/kg d5-CR ≯42 days; mitoxantrone (MA) 10mg/m2 d3, or 7mg/m2 d2-4 (high risk).

Consolidation 1:

ATRA 25mg/m2 d1-15; MA 10mg/m2 d1-2; Intrathecal injection (IT):Ara-C 15mg (age < 1 year), or 20 mg (1-3 years), or 30 mg ( > 3 years), dexamethasone 2mg.

Consolidation 2:

ATRA 25mg/m2 d1-15; ATO 0.16mg/kg d1-15; Ara-C 1g/m2 q12h d1-2 (high risk); IT.

Consolidation 3:

ATRA 25mg/m2 d1-15; ATO 0.16mg/kg d1-15; MA 10mg/m2 d1; Ara-C 1g/m2 q12h d1-2 (high risk); IT.

Maintenance:

① ATO 0.16mg/kg.d w1-2; ATRA 25mg/m2.d w1-2; MTX 20mg/m2 qw w3-12; 6MP 50mg/m2 qn w3-12. ② ATRA 25mg/m2.d w1-2; MTX 20mg/m2 qw w3-12; 6MP 50mg/m2 qn w3-12. Rotation between ① and ② until the end of maintenance.

Given IV
Other Names:
  • As2O3
  • arsenic trioxide
Given orally
Other Names:
  • all-trans retinoic acid
Given IV
Other Names:
  • novantrone
Given IV
Other Names:
  • cytosine arabinoside
  • cytarabine
Given orally
Other Names:
  • methotrexate
Given orally
Other Names:
  • mercaptopurine
Ara-C and dexamethasone
Other Names:
  • IT
Experimental: RIF and chemotherapy

Induction:

ATRA 25mg/m2 d1-CR ≯42 days; RIF 0.135/kg d5-CR ≯42 days; mitoxantrone (MA) 10mg/m2 d3, or 7mg/m2 d2-4 (high risk).

Consolidation 1:

ATRA 25mg/m2 d1-15; MA 10mg/m2 d1-2; Intrathecal injection (IT):Ara-C 15mg (age < 1 year), or 20mg (age 1-3 years), or 30mg (age > 3 years), dexamethasone 2mg.

Consolidation 2:

ATRA 25mg/m2 d1-15; RIF 0.135/kg d1-15; Ara-C 1g/m2 q12h d1-2 (high risk); IT.

Consolidation 3:

ATRA 25mg/m2 d1-15; RIF 0.135/kg d1-15; MA 10mg/m2 d1; Ara-C 1g/m2 q12h d1-2 (high risk); IT.

Maintenance:

① RIF 0.135/kg.d w1-2; ATRA 25mg/m2.d w1-2; MTX 20mg/m2 qw w3-12; 6MP 50mg/m2 qn w3-12. ② ATRA 25mg/m2.d w1-2; MTX 20mg/m2 qw w3-12; 6MP 50mg/m2 qn w3-12. Rotation between ① and ② until the end of maintenance treatment.

Given orally
Other Names:
  • all-trans retinoic acid
Given IV
Other Names:
  • novantrone
Given IV
Other Names:
  • cytosine arabinoside
  • cytarabine
Given orally
Other Names:
  • methotrexate
Given orally
Other Names:
  • mercaptopurine
Ara-C and dexamethasone
Other Names:
  • IT
Given orally
Other Names:
  • Realgar-Indigo naturalis formula

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
event-free survival
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hospitalization cost
Time Frame: 2 years
The cost mainly includes the fees of hospital bed, drugs, therapies and blood products. Time frame: from the beginning of induction therapy to the end of maintenance treatment.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xue-Qun Luo, professor, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 8, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 25, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Childhood Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

Clinical Trials on ATO

3
Subscribe