BIS Monitoring to Detect Deep Sedation

December 24, 2014 updated by: Jian-Xin Zhou, Capital Medical University

Use of Bispectral Index Monitoring as an Alert to Detect Deep Sedation in Mechanical Ventilated Patients: a Prospective Observational Study

Studies have shown that prolonged deep sedation is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The revised guidelines for management of pain, agitation and delirium by the Society of Critical Care Medicine in 2013 also recommended that adult ICU patients should be maintained at a light level of sedation. The key point in light sedation strategy is the assessment of depth of sedation. At present, sedation is monitored mainly by the subjective clinical score systems, such as the Ramsay Scale, the Riker's Sedation-Agitation Scale (SAS) and the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). However, the subjective and intermittent nature of these scales instruments has limited their application in light sedation algorithm. Consequently, objective and continuous measurement of the level of sedation would be more desirable in clinical practice. In recent years, objective measures of brain function have been of great interests in the evaluation of sedation level, and bispectral index (BIS) has been the most investigated instrument.

Several studies compared BIS with subjective sedation scales in adult ICU patients, and yielded conflicting results. The different approaches to select BIS value may be the most important reason for these inconsistent agreements between BIS and subjective sedation scales. A formal scheme of subjective assessment of the depth of sedation and level of consciousness should incorporate exerting verbal and physical stimuli and observation of the patient's subsequent responses. Our primary aim is to clarify the diagnostic accuracy of BIS in detecting early deep sedation against the reference standard of subjective scale instrument. We hypothesize that BIS monitoring will provide accurate, subjective and continuous evaluation of deepen sedation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 102600
        • Department of Critical Care Medicine, Daxing Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients admitted to a 22-bed general ICU in a University Affiliated Hospital will be screened daily and enrolled consecutively.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients are intubated and ventilated within the previous 24 hours, are administered with continuous or intermittent intravenous sedatives and/or analgesics, and are expected to receive mechanical ventilation and sedation for longer than 24 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 or over 65 years;
  • Continuously infusion of muscle relaxants;
  • Diagnosed or suspected brain diseases, which including brain trauma, intracranial hemorrhage, stroke, brain tumors, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, epilepsy and meningitis;
  • Diagnosed conditions that resulted in a decrease level of consciousness, which including hypoxemia with partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood less than 60 mmHg, hypotension with systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg, hypoglycemia with blood glucose concentration less than 4.1 mmol/L, anemia with hemoglobin concentration less than 70 g/L, and body temperature below 36 °C.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Light sedation
Light sedation is defined as RASS of +1 to -2.
Deep sedation
Deep sedation is defined as RASS of -3 to -5

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary aim of present study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of BIS monitoring for detecting deep sedation against the reference standard of RASS.
Time Frame: 15 minutes before and after RASS evaluation
According to RASS evaluation, observations in each time point will be stratified into 2 situations: light sedation (RASS= 0 to -2) and deep sedation (RASS= -3 to -5). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis will be applied to determine the probability of BIS values in predicting deep sedation.
15 minutes before and after RASS evaluation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of deep sedation
Time Frame: 24 hours after establishing of BIS monitoring
24 hours after establishing of BIS monitoring
Occurrence of deep sedation during day- and night-time
Time Frame: 24 hours after establishing of BIS monitoring
Day-time is defined as 8AM to 8PM, and night-time as 8PM to 8AM.
24 hours after establishing of BIS monitoring

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jian-Xin Zhou, MD, Capital Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 29, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 30, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mechanical Ventilation Complication

Subscribe