Differentiation of Pseudoprogression and True Progression Through High Field Susceptibility Weighted Imaging and R2*

Using a multi-echo gradient echo sequence to calculate R2* and quantitative susceptibility maps and well as susceptibility-weighted imaging post processing the investigators hypothesize that the investigators would be able to distinguish between pseudoprogression and true progression with the use of an easily implementable sequence on clinical MRI scanners.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Post-treatment radiographic imaging change (PTRIC) is seen in approximately 50% of patients who are treated for brain neoplasms using chemotherapy and radiotherapy. PTRIC can be attributed to true disease progression or a form of benign radiographic enhancement, known in literature as pseudoprogression. Of these patients, 50% of them have benign radiographic enhancement that is usually spontaneously resolved and required no intervention. The other 50% require immediate medical intervention, or more aggressive treatment for true progression. Currently standard medical practise is to administer a prophylactic treatment of chemotherapy to all patients with PTRIC with a follow up scan 3-6 months after initial PTRIC diagnosis, leading to up to 50% of patients receiving an unneeded dose of chemotherapy. The investigators hope to take advantage of the differentiation in tissue types and vascularization between true progression tumour and pseudoprogression to be able to identify patients who would not need to be administered a prophylactic dose of chemotherapy.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6G2J9
        • University of Western Ontario

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who have had treatment for brain neoplasms treated with radiation and/or chemotherapy who presents with post-treatment imaging changes on the MRI following treatment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The subject must consent to participate.
  2. The subject must be above the age of 18.
  3. Patients must be classified as possible pseudoprogression or true progression
  4. Patients scoring >= 70 on the karnofsky performance status.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any subject with contraindication to an MRI procedure as listed in the Magnetic Resonance Environment Screening Questionnaire.
  2. Any subject who may be unable to tolerate the MRI environment due to physical size and/or known tendency to claustrophobia.
  3. Any subject who does not expect to be available to attend the for the required study MRI scans
  4. Patients scoring < 70 on the karnofsky performance status.
  5. Attending radiation oncologist or neurologist determines patient is no longer able to consent for themselves.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease Progression
Time Frame: 6 months
R2* and susceptibility-weighted imaging venography to determine retrospectively if pseudoprogression can be distinguished from true progression
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ravi S Menon, PhD, Western University, Canada
  • Principal Investigator: Glenn Bauman, MD, Western University, Canada

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

August 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 31, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Radiation Necrosis

3
Subscribe