- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02250547
Optimization With SonR Method in the ClinicAl pRactice (OSCAR)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Thanks to the SonR technology it is possible to adjust the optimal VV and AV delays over time, in a fully automatic, time saving and operator independent way. It is possible to optimize the VV and AV delays in office, during follow-up visits, but also enable the automatic optimization that weekly optimize the AV and VV delays.
For the reasons mentioned above, the sponsor expects that the SonR optimization method increases the number of patients optimized systematically at each follow-up The purpose of this study is to evaluate the percentage of patients optimized at least once every month by the SonR automatic optimization method, until M6 follow-up, in HF patients prevalently in sinus rhythm.
The primary objective will be evaluated as the percentage of patients successfully optimized every month until M6.
A patient is considered successfully optimized by the SonR during one month if at least one Atri-Ventricular (AV) or Ventricular-Ventricular (VV) optimization is completed by the SonR automatic optimization method during the month.
Patients eligible for the analysis are those with SonR automatic optimization function enabled and at least 50% of the time in sinus rhythm
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Linz, Austria
- Allgemeines Krankenhaus Linz (AKH LINZ)
-
-
-
-
-
Corbeil Essonne, France, 91100
- CH SUd Francilien
-
Haguenau, France, 67500
- Centre Hospitalier de Haguenau
-
Jossigny, France, 77600
- CH de Marne la Vallée
-
Le Mans, France, 72000
- CMC du Mans - Pôle Santé Sud
-
Lille, France, 59003
- Polyclinique Du Bois
-
Limoges, France, 87042
- Chu Dupuytren
-
Lomme, France, 59462
- CH St Philibert
-
Lyon, France, 69365
- CH St Joseph et St Luc
-
Marseille, France, 13425
- Polyclinique Beauregard
-
Montbéliard, France, 25209
- Centre hospitalier Belford Montbéliard
-
Poitiers, France
- CH Poitiers
-
Roubaix, France, 59056
- Hôpital Victor Provo
-
-
-
-
-
Bielefeld, Germany, 33617
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus
-
Papenburg, Germany, 26871
- PAP2 - Kardiologische Praxis Papenburg
-
-
-
-
-
L'aquila, Italy, 67100
- Osp. S. Salvatore
-
Napoli, Italy
- S.Giovanni Bosco
-
-
-
-
-
Evora, Portugal, 7000-811
- Hospital Espírito Santo, E.P.E
-
Faro, Portugal, 8000-386
- Hospital Central Faro
-
Lisboa, Portugal, 1649
- Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte (CHLN) - Hospital de Santa Maria
-
-
-
-
-
Sevilla, Spain, 41013
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient eligible for implantation or implanted for less than 6 weeks (primo-implant, replacement, upgrade) with a a Paradym RF SonR CRT-D and SonRtip Atrial Lead, according to current available guidelines (RF=radio frequency)
- Patient has signed and dated informed consent (according to the laws and regulations of the country in which the observation is performed)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Persistent atrial arrhythmias
- Already included in another interventional clinical study
- Not available for routine follow-up visits
- Inability to understand the purpose of the study
- Under guardianship
- Under18 years old
- Drug addiction or abuse
- Pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
evaluate the percentage of patients optimized at least once every month by the SonR automatic optimization method, until M6 follow-up, in HF patients prevalently in sinus rhythm
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The primary objective will be evaluated as the percentage of patients successfully optimized every month until M6. A patient is considered successfully optimized by the SonR during one month if at least one AV or VV optimization is completed by the SonR automatic optimization method during the month. Patients eligible for the analysis are those with SonR automatic optimization function enabled and at least 50% of the time in sinus rhythm |
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of patients with SonR automatic optimization function enabled at each follow-up
Time Frame: 6M
|
The number of patients with automatic SonR optimization enabled over the total number of patients at: Implantation, Baseline, M6
|
6M
|
Analyze the evolution of optimal AV and VV delays SonR optimized over time
Time Frame: 6M
|
Compare the mean and the intra-patient AV and VV delays between consecutive follow-ups
|
6M
|
Report system-related complications
Time Frame: 6M
|
Report system-related complications
|
6M
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Carsten W Israel, Evangelischen Krankenhaus Bielefeld - Germany
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- RCSY01 OSCAR
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on CRT Patients
-
Guidant CorporationCompleted
-
Biotronik SE & Co. KGCompleted
-
Biotronik SE & Co. KGCompleted
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityCompletedHeart Failure | Patients Undergoing CRT-D Device ImplantationUnited States
-
CMC Ambroise ParéWithdrawnCompare Two Programming Modalities for CRT Devices in Heart Failure Patients With an Indication for Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyMonaco, France
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompletedImplantable Cardioverter Defibrillators | CRT-D Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy DefibrillatorKorea, Republic of, United States, United Kingdom, Japan, Germany, Canada, Spain, Switzerland
-
Biotronik SE & Co. KGCompletedSafety of MR (Magnetic Resonance) Conditional CRT-pacemakers and ICDsFrance, Germany, Hungary, Canada, Australia, Austria, Czech Republic, Switzerland
-
Taichung Veterans General HospitalCompletedHeart Failure With or Without CRT-P/D
-
Helse Stavanger HFUniversity of Oslo; University of Tromso; The Royal Norwegian Ministry of HealthCompletedSkeletal Muscle Changes After CrtNorway
-
Abbott Medical DevicesThoratec Europe LtdCompletedAdvanced Heart Failure | CRT and/or ICDNetherlands, Sweden, Denmark, France, Germany, United Kingdom