Optimization With SonR Method in the ClinicAl pRactice (OSCAR)

November 10, 2017 updated by: LivaNova
Evaluate the percentage of patients optimized at least once every month by the SonR automatic optimization method, until M6 follow-up, in Heart failure (HF) patients prevalently in sinus rhythm

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Thanks to the SonR technology it is possible to adjust the optimal VV and AV delays over time, in a fully automatic, time saving and operator independent way. It is possible to optimize the VV and AV delays in office, during follow-up visits, but also enable the automatic optimization that weekly optimize the AV and VV delays.

For the reasons mentioned above, the sponsor expects that the SonR optimization method increases the number of patients optimized systematically at each follow-up The purpose of this study is to evaluate the percentage of patients optimized at least once every month by the SonR automatic optimization method, until M6 follow-up, in HF patients prevalently in sinus rhythm.

The primary objective will be evaluated as the percentage of patients successfully optimized every month until M6.

A patient is considered successfully optimized by the SonR during one month if at least one Atri-Ventricular (AV) or Ventricular-Ventricular (VV) optimization is completed by the SonR automatic optimization method during the month.

Patients eligible for the analysis are those with SonR automatic optimization function enabled and at least 50% of the time in sinus rhythm

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

278

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Linz, Austria
        • Allgemeines Krankenhaus Linz (AKH LINZ)
      • Corbeil Essonne, France, 91100
        • CH SUd Francilien
      • Haguenau, France, 67500
        • Centre Hospitalier de Haguenau
      • Jossigny, France, 77600
        • CH de Marne la Vallée
      • Le Mans, France, 72000
        • CMC du Mans - Pôle Santé Sud
      • Lille, France, 59003
        • Polyclinique Du Bois
      • Limoges, France, 87042
        • Chu Dupuytren
      • Lomme, France, 59462
        • CH St Philibert
      • Lyon, France, 69365
        • CH St Joseph et St Luc
      • Marseille, France, 13425
        • Polyclinique Beauregard
      • Montbéliard, France, 25209
        • Centre hospitalier Belford Montbéliard
      • Poitiers, France
        • CH Poitiers
      • Roubaix, France, 59056
        • Hôpital Victor Provo
      • Bielefeld, Germany, 33617
        • Evangelisches Krankenhaus
      • Papenburg, Germany, 26871
        • PAP2 - Kardiologische Praxis Papenburg
      • L'aquila, Italy, 67100
        • Osp. S. Salvatore
      • Napoli, Italy
        • S.Giovanni Bosco
      • Evora, Portugal, 7000-811
        • Hospital Espírito Santo, E.P.E
      • Faro, Portugal, 8000-386
        • Hospital Central Faro
      • Lisboa, Portugal, 1649
        • Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte (CHLN) - Hospital de Santa Maria
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41013
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Cardiac resyncronisation therapy - defibrillator (CRT-D) patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient eligible for implantation or implanted for less than 6 weeks (primo-implant, replacement, upgrade) with a a Paradym RF SonR CRT-D and SonRtip Atrial Lead, according to current available guidelines (RF=radio frequency)
  • Patient has signed and dated informed consent (according to the laws and regulations of the country in which the observation is performed)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persistent atrial arrhythmias
  • Already included in another interventional clinical study
  • Not available for routine follow-up visits
  • Inability to understand the purpose of the study
  • Under guardianship
  • Under18 years old
  • Drug addiction or abuse
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
evaluate the percentage of patients optimized at least once every month by the SonR automatic optimization method, until M6 follow-up, in HF patients prevalently in sinus rhythm
Time Frame: 6 months

The primary objective will be evaluated as the percentage of patients successfully optimized every month until M6.

A patient is considered successfully optimized by the SonR during one month if at least one AV or VV optimization is completed by the SonR automatic optimization method during the month.

Patients eligible for the analysis are those with SonR automatic optimization function enabled and at least 50% of the time in sinus rhythm

6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients with SonR automatic optimization function enabled at each follow-up
Time Frame: 6M
The number of patients with automatic SonR optimization enabled over the total number of patients at: Implantation, Baseline, M6
6M
Analyze the evolution of optimal AV and VV delays SonR optimized over time
Time Frame: 6M
Compare the mean and the intra-patient AV and VV delays between consecutive follow-ups
6M
Report system-related complications
Time Frame: 6M
Report system-related complications
6M

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Carsten W Israel, Evangelischen Krankenhaus Bielefeld - Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 26, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RCSY01 OSCAR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on CRT Patients

3
Subscribe