Protective Efficacy of Flublok® Quadrivalent Versus Licensed Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults ≥50 Years of Age

September 26, 2017 updated by: Protein Sciences Corporation

Comparison of the Protective Efficacy of Flublok® Quadrivalent Versus Licensed Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (IIV4) in Healthy, Medically Stable Adults ≥50 Years of Age

The goal of this study is to establish that Flublok Quadrivalent is non-inferior to fully licensed (traditional approval status) quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) in protecting against laboratory-confirmed clinical influenza disease in the ≥50 year age population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The goal of this study is to establish that Flublok Quadrivalent is non-inferior to fully licensed (traditional approval status) quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) in protecting against laboratory-confirmed clinical influenza disease in the ≥50 year age population. Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (rtPCR) will be used to confirm influenza infection and to type the strains involved, as molecular methodologies have been demonstrated to be more sensitive than other more traditional methodologies, e.g. culture. For rtPCR-positive clinical samples, reserved aliquots will be processed for culture, so that antigenic similarity to the HA present in study vaccines can be tested.

In various clinical studies the investigators demonstrated that the immune response against the influenza A viruses is improved as a result of the higher hemagglutinin content. Furthermore, influenza virus disease and hospitalization associated with influenza-related illness in older adults (> 50 years) was considerably reduced (90%) following vaccination with TIV, even though the circulating influenza A strain was antigenically dissimilar to that in the vaccine. However, more recently Skowronski et al. reported that the low influenza vaccine effectiveness in 2012-2013 was not associated with antigenic drift but was instead related to mutations in the egg-adapted H3N2 vaccine strain. Flublok manufactured using recombinant technology does not contain the mutations responsible for the reported lower effectiveness and may thus offer improved protection when mutations such as those described are induced in the process of adapting the influenza virus to growth in eggs.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

9003

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Mobile, Alabama, United States, 36608
        • Coastal Clinical Research
    • Arizona
      • Tempe, Arizona, United States, 85283
        • Clinical Research Consortium Arizona
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
        • Baptist Health Center for Clinical Research
    • California
      • Redding, California, United States, 96001
        • Northern California Clinical Research Center
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
        • Benchmark Research - Sacramento
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94102
        • Benchmark Research - San Francisco
    • Colorado
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80907
        • Lynn Institute Of The Rockies
    • Connecticut
      • Milford, Connecticut, United States, 06460
        • Clinical Research Consulting
    • Florida
      • Coral Gables, Florida, United States, 33134
        • Clinical Research of South Florida
      • DeLand, Florida, United States, 32720
        • Avail Clinical Research
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32205
        • Westside Center for Clinical Research
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32216
        • Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research
      • Port Orange, Florida, United States, 32127
        • Progressive Medical Research
    • Georgia
      • Savannah, Georgia, United States, 31406
        • Meridian Research
    • Idaho
      • Meridian, Idaho, United States, 83642
        • ACR - Boise
    • Kansas
      • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67207
        • Heartland Research Associates, LLC
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40509
        • Central Kentucky Research Associates
    • Louisiana
      • Metairie, Louisiana, United States, 70006
        • Benchmarch Research - New Orleans
    • Massachusetts
      • Methuen, Massachusetts, United States, 01844
        • ActivMed Practices & Research
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64114
        • Center for Pharmaceutical Research
    • Nebraska
      • Bellevue, Nebraska, United States, 68005
        • Meridian Research
      • Norfolk, Nebraska, United States, 68701
        • Meridian Research
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68164
        • Meridian Clinical Research
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89119
        • Clinical Research Consortium-Nevada
    • New Hampshire
      • Newington, New Hampshire, United States, 03801
        • ActivMed Practices & Research
    • New York
      • Endwell, New York, United States, 13760
        • Regional Clinical Research, Inc.
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14609
        • Rochester Clinical Research
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27612
        • Wake Research
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44122
        • Rapid Medical Research, Inc.
    • Oklahoma
      • Norman, Oklahoma, United States, 73069
        • Lynn Institute of Norman
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73112
        • Lynn Health Science Institute
    • South Dakota
      • Dakota Dunes, South Dakota, United States, 57049
        • Meridian Research
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • Clinical Research Associates
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
        • Benchmark Reseach
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76135
        • Benchmark Research - Fort Worth
      • San Angelo, Texas, United States, 76904
        • Benchmark Research - San Angelo
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84124
        • Jean Brown Research
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507
        • Clinical Research Associates of Tidewater

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

48 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ambulatory adults aged 50 and older.
  2. Medically stable, as determined by medical history and targeted physical examination. "Medically stable" is defined as no change in diagnoses or chronic medications (dose or class) for medical reasons in the 3 months prior to study.
  3. Absence of underlying conditions that make participation in the study contrary to the subject's best interest.
  4. Able to understand and comply with planned study procedures.
  5. Provides written informed consent prior to initiation of any study procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known contraindication to either study vaccine (see product package inserts)
  2. Receipt of any other influenza vaccine within 180 days prior to enrollment in this study.
  3. Underlying disease or ongoing therapy that might cause immunocompromise, e.g. cytotoxic agents or supraphysiologic doses of corticosteroids, such that response to vaccination might be sub-optimal.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Flublok Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine
Intramuscular injection of vaccine containing 4 x 45µg (180µg total) of each recombinant hemagglutinin (rHA) derived from influenza A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 and two lineages of influenza B viruses identified for the season in which the trial is conducted in a total volume of 0.5 mL
Intramuscular injection of vaccine
Active Comparator: Inactivated Influenza Vaccine
Intramuscular injection of vaccine contains 4 x 15µg (60µg total) of HA derived from the same influenza A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 and influenza B strains in a total volume of 0.5mL.
Intramuscular injection of vaccine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With rtPCR-confirmed Influenza-Like Illness
Time Frame: 14 days post vaccination through and up to 32 weeks post vaccination
rtPCR-confirmed, protocol-defined Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) caused by any influenza strain that begins at least 14 days post-vaccination
14 days post vaccination through and up to 32 weeks post vaccination

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Culture-confirmed Influenza-Like Illness
Time Frame: 14 days post vaccination through and up to 32 weeks post vaccination

Culture-confirmed protocol-defined Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) that begins at least 14 days post-vaccination caused by an influenza strain (identified from the same clinical sample) antigenically matched to those strains represented in the study vaccines.

Protocol-defined ILI is defined as at least one of the following respiratory symptoms accompanied by at least one of the following systemic symptoms:

Respiratory symptoms: sore throat, cough, sputm production, wheezing, difficulty breathing Systemic symptoms: fever, chills (shivering), tiredness (fatigue), headache, myalgia (muscle ache)

14 days post vaccination through and up to 32 weeks post vaccination
Number of Participants With Culture-confirmed CDC-defined Influenza-Like Illness
Time Frame: 14 days post vaccination through and up to 32 weeks post vaccination

Culture-confirmed CDC-defined Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) that begins at least 14 days post-vaccination caused by an influenza strain (identified from the same clinical sample) antigenically matched to those in the study vaccines.

CDC-defined ILI is defined as body temperature ≥100°F accompanied by cough and/or sore throat.

14 days post vaccination through and up to 32 weeks post vaccination
Number of Participants With rtPCR-confirmed CDC-defined Influenza-Like Illness
Time Frame: 14 days post vaccination through and up to 32 weeks post vaccination
rtPCR-confirmed CDC-defined ILI that begins at least 14 days post-vaccination caused by any influenza strain.
14 days post vaccination through and up to 32 weeks post vaccination
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion
Time Frame: Days 0 through 28
Seroconversion rates (SCR) for all four antigens in a preselected subset of subjects.
Days 0 through 28
Number of Participants With Local Injection Site Reactogenicity
Time Frame: Days 0 through 7
Solicited events of injection site reactogenicity reported during Day 0-7.
Days 0 through 7
Number of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse Events
Time Frame: Days 0 through 28
Unsolicited adverse events reported in the 28 days following vaccine administration.
Days 0 through 28
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Medically-attended Adverse Events (MAEs)
Time Frame: Day 0 through and up to 32 weeks post vaccination

Serious adverse events (SAEs) and medically-attended adverse events (MAEs) occurring during the period of follow-up through the influenza season (at least 6 months post-vaccination).

A MAE is an event that prompts an unplanned visit to a medical professional for diagnosis and/or treatment.

Day 0 through and up to 32 weeks post vaccination
Measure of Post-vaccination HAI GMTs
Time Frame: Days 0 through 28
GMT titers for all four antigens in a preselected subset of subjects.
Days 0 through 28
Number of Participants With Systemic Reactogenicity
Time Frame: Days 0 through 7
Solicited events of systemic reactogenicity reported during Day 0-7.
Days 0 through 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 7, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Influenza

Clinical Trials on Flublok Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine

3
Subscribe