Effectiveness of Epidural Anesthesia for Thoracic and Abdominal Surgery

April 16, 2018 updated by: Mingkwan Wongyingsinn, MD, Siriraj Hospital

Effectiveness of Epidural Anesthesia for Thoracic and Abdominal Surgery in Siriraj Hospital

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the epidural analgesia in patients having elective thoracic and abdominal surgery under general anesthesia combined with epidural analgesia in Siriraj Hospital.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Epidural analgesia is the recommended perioperative analgesia in patients having major surgery in order to significantly reduced pain scores, minimize patient distress and can accelerate postoperative recovery especially with the major operation This technique has been reported to provide better pain control and less postoperative fatigue compared with patients receiving general anesthesia alone.Additionally, it is recommended in patients having major surgery to allow patients to mobilize quickly and have effective mobilization.This technique has been shown to be highly efficient at preventing postoperative ileus and various complications. Moreover, epidural analgesic technique is demonstrated to be safer and have fewer side effects than using intravenous opioids alone.

However, the epidural technique is not universally successful and the number of patients experiencing inadequate analgesia with this technique is approximately 12-32%. The failure of epidural analgesia is still a frequent clinical problem and needs active management including a new block or other analgesic medication in order to rescue postoperative pain. Previous study showed that the incidence of patients having epidural analgesia with postoperative moderate pain was 20.9% and that with severe pain was 7.8%. In Siriraj Hospital, recent study showed that 19.6% of patients having elective upper abdominal surgery under general anesthesia combined with epidural analgesia reported severe first pain scores in post anesthetic care unit.27 As a result of severe pain, patients needed a number of intervention and management from acute pain service, and finally spent longer time in post anesthetic care unit.

Inadequate pain control in patients receiving epidural analgesia frequently occurred in clinical practice but the number of the success rate or the failure rate have not been reported in our hospital. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the epidural analgesia in patients having elective thoracic and abdominal surgery under general anesthesia combined with epidural analgesia in Siriraj Hospital.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

364

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
        • Siriraj Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

patients scheduled to have thoracic or abdominal surgery under general anesthesia combined with epidural analgesia in Siriraj hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients aged more than 18 years old scheduled to have thoracic or abdominal surgery under general anesthesia combined with epidural analgesia in Siriraj hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to communicate or inform pain score
  • cesarean section or labor analgesia
  • additional analgesic techniques (spinal analgesia, paravertebral nerve block, intercostal block, transversus abdominis plane block, rectus sheath block, ilioinguinal block, iliohypogastric block
  • emergency surgery
  • fail epidural block after test dose of local anesthetics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients Reporting Postoperative Verbal Rating Scale Pain at Rest More Than 7
Time Frame: at postoperative 24 hours

Verbal Rating Scale Pain will routinely be assessed at postoperative 24 hours by the ward nurse.

Minimum and maximum scores possible are 0 and 10. The higher values represent patients having more pain. Severe pain is defined as Verbal Rating Scale pain at rest more than 7.

at postoperative 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients Requiring Rescue Analgesic Medication
Time Frame: during the period of retaining of epidural catheter up to 3 days after operation
Number of patients requiring at least one rescue analgesic medication including epidural catheter, oral and intravenous route after the operation
during the period of retaining of epidural catheter up to 3 days after operation
Duration Retaining Epidural Catheter
Time Frame: the period of retaining of epidural catheter up to 3 days after operation
Duration retaining epidural catheter in hospital
the period of retaining of epidural catheter up to 3 days after operation
All Adverse Effects and Postoperative Complications.
Time Frame: the period of retaining of epidural catheter up to 3 days after operation
All Adverse Effects and Postoperative Complications included the number of patients having postoperative nausea and vomiting; hypotension; accidental dural puncture and post-dural puncture headache.
the period of retaining of epidural catheter up to 3 days after operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mingkwan Wongyingsinn, MD, MSc, Siriraj Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SIRB004

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Analgesia Disorder

Clinical Trials on Elective Thoracic and Abdominal Surgery Patients

3
Subscribe