Meditation and Stretching for Post Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (LMS)

November 27, 2022 updated by: Brian A Fallon, Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc.
The investigators wish to conduct a preliminary study to examine the efficacy of meditation among patients with Post Treatment Lyme Syndrome (PTLDS). Specifically, the investigators will use the breathing, meditation, and stretching techniques common to Kundalini Yoga practice. The investigators plan to assess the degree in which this practice can reduce Post-Treatment Lyme Disease symptoms. Because fatigue and pain are so common among patients with PTLDS, the primary focus of this study will be fatigue and pain. Secondary outcomes will include cognitive complaints, physical and mental functioning, medical utilization, somatic symptoms, and psychopathology.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The CDC reports that approximately 10-20% of patients treated for Lyme disease with the IDSA-recommended 2-4 week course of antibiotics will continue to have symptoms of fatigue, pain, or joint and muscle aches despite prior antibiotic treatment. The symptoms can last months or even years after treatment. The medical community officially calls this condition "Post-treatment Lyme disease Syndrome" (PTLDS) but some have called it "chronic Lyme disease." Because some patients with PTLDS continue to have ongoing symptoms despite many additional courses of antibiotics beyond the standard course, alternative non-antibiotic treatment programs need to be explored. The proposed study seeks to evaluate the efficacy of meditation among those patients that have been previously treated for Lyme disease but are still continuing to experience prominent symptoms of fatigue and/or pain.

During this study, patients will be screened initially over the telephone to assess eligibility, sign consent with the study treating psychiatrist, and complete self-report questionnaires. Forty patients will be enrolled. Of these, 20 will be randomly assigned to meditation group therapy and 20 will be assigned to a wait-list. Assessments will be conducted prior to treatment, at 4 weeks and at 8 weeks. There will also be a 6 month follow-up by questionnaire and telephone interview. Study participants randomized to the wait-list control group will then be offered, after 8 weeks, the option of joining a meditation group for 8 weeks. Each meditation group will be composed of 6-8 subjects.

Should this study find evidence suggesting that meditation therapy is helpful in reducing the symptoms of PTLDS, this would be a valuable finding that would lead to a larger study as it has important public health implications for many individuals now quite disabled with these chronic symptoms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • Southport, Connecticut, United States, 06890
        • Private Practice Office of Dr. Alexander
        • Contact:
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • New York State Psychiatric Institute
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Charles Alexander, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Brian A Fallon, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of prior diagnosis of Lyme Disease at least 6 months prior to assessment

    1. EM Rash seen by health professional

      -OR-

    2. History of physician diagnosed disseminated Lyme disease
  • Previously treated for Lyme Disease with antibiotics appropriate for stage of disease
  • Current symptoms of PTLDS started within 6 months after getting Lyme disease
  • Current symptoms have been present for at least the last 6 months.
  • Between the ages of 18 and 65, English speaking, male or female
  • Primary complaint of fatigue or pain meeting predetermined severity criteria
  • Individuals whose medical and/or psychiatric treatment has been stable for the prior 8 weeks
  • Individuals who agree to not start a new treatment for PTLS during the course of the study; this applies to both those assigned to the control wait list group and those assigned to the experimental group.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individual with another reasonable medical explanation (other than Lyme) that might better account for current fatigue or pain (e.g., Thyroid Disease, Anemia, Rheumatoid Arthritis)
  • Individual with a major psychiatric diagnosis that might make study participation difficult (e.g, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Psychosis, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Substance abuse with the prior 6 months, Pain Disorder treated with opiate-based medication)
  • Individuals with severe depression
  • Individuals with Physical disability that might make study participation difficult
  • Individuals whose current medical status is so severe or unstable that participation in the study (and not receiving new treatments from other providers) would be difficult.
  • Unwillingness to complete questionnaires, speak with study research assistant, or dedicate twenty minutes daily to meditation and stretching
  • Suicide attempts within the last 6 months or current suicidal thoughts
  • Individuals unwilling to delay starting optional treatment for Lyme disease for the duration of the study
  • Individuals with a prior lifetime practice of at least one month of daily practice of MBSR or mindfulness or those who currently practice daily meditation or yoga

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Meditation Group Therapy
Kundalini Yoga incorporates mindfulness practice with a triad of stretching, breathing, and meditation. The three components of treatment consist of muscular relaxation/stretching exercises, a meditation period characterized by a directed breathing exercise, and then a guided meditation.
Kundalini Yoga incorporates mindfulness practice with a triad of stretching, breathing, and meditation. The three components of treatment consist of muscular relaxation/stretching exercises, a meditation period characterized by a directed breathing exercise, and then a guided meditation.
Other Names:
  • Relaxation, stretching and meditation
No Intervention: Wait-List Controls
The wait-list group will not take part in study treatment (daily meditation or stretching) during the study wait of 8 weeks in order for us to compare change related to the study intervention to change associated with no active treatment ( treatment-as-usual). (After completing 8 weeks of no study treatment as part of the wait-list group, these patients will be offered the opportunity to receive 8 weeks of treatment.)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue (Self-reported Level of Fatigue as Measured by the PROMIS Fatigue Scale)
Time Frame: Assessed at week 4 and 8; week 8 value is reported (primary endpoint). 6 month assessment not conducted.
Self-reported assessment of fatigue as measured by the 7 item PROMIS Fatigue Scale. The raw score range is 7-35. The raw score is converted to a T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10; the results reported here are the T-scores. HIgher scores indicate greater fatigue
Assessed at week 4 and 8; week 8 value is reported (primary endpoint). 6 month assessment not conducted.
Pain Interference (PROMIS Pain Interference Scale)
Time Frame: Assessed at weeks 4 and 8; week 8 data reported (primary endpoint). 6 month assessment not conducted.
Self-reported assessment of pain interference as measured by the 6-item PROMIS Pain Interference Scale. The raw score range is 6-30. The raw score is converted to a T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10; the results reported here are the T-scores. HIgher scores indicate greater pain interference.
Assessed at weeks 4 and 8; week 8 data reported (primary endpoint). 6 month assessment not conducted.
Global Health (Self-reported Levels of Satisfaction With Global Health)
Time Frame: Assessed at week 4 and 8; week 8 is reported (primary endpoint). 6 month assessment not conducted.
Self-reported assessment of satisfaction with global health as measured by the 1st item ( a 5 point scale, range 1-5) on the PROMIS Global Heath Scale where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with health.
Assessed at week 4 and 8; week 8 is reported (primary endpoint). 6 month assessment not conducted.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical Functioning (as Measured by the PROMIS Physical Functioning Scale)
Time Frame: Assessed at weeks 4 and 8; week 8 data reported (primary endpoint). Month 6 assessment not conducted.
Self-reported assessment of physical functioning as measured by the PROMIS Physical Functioning 8 item Scale. Raw score range 8-40. The raw score is converted to a T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10; the results reported here are the T-scores. HIgher scores indicate better physical functioning.
Assessed at weeks 4 and 8; week 8 data reported (primary endpoint). Month 6 assessment not conducted.
General Symptom Questionnaire-30 (Self-reported Symptom Burden)
Time Frame: Assessed at 4 and 8 weeks; 8 week values are reported (primary endpoint). Month 6 assessment not conducted.
Self-reported assessment of symptom burden as measured by the 30 item multisystem Global Symptom Questionnaire. Range is 0-120 where higher scores indicate greater symptom burden
Assessed at 4 and 8 weeks; 8 week values are reported (primary endpoint). Month 6 assessment not conducted.
Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: Assessed at weeks 4 and 8; 8 week data is reported (primary endpoint). Month 6 assessment not conducted.
Self reported mood as measured by the 21 item Beck Depression Inventory. Range is 0-63 where higher scores indicate greater depression.
Assessed at weeks 4 and 8; 8 week data is reported (primary endpoint). Month 6 assessment not conducted.
PROMIS Social Satisfaction
Time Frame: Assessed at 4 and 8 weeks; 8 week values are reported (primary endpoint). 6 month assessment was not conducted. .
Assesses satisfaction with social functioning. 8 item scale. Raw score range i 8-40). The raw score is converted to a T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10; the results reported here are the T-scores. HIgher scores indicate greater satisfaction with social functioning.
Assessed at 4 and 8 weeks; 8 week values are reported (primary endpoint). 6 month assessment was not conducted. .
Applied Cognition General Concerns Short-form
Time Frame: Assessed and 4 and 8 weeks; the 8 week results are reported (primary outcome timepoint). The 6 month assessment was not conducted.
This self-report NeuroQoL measure assesses general concerns about cognition. This is an 8 item scale, with raw scores ranging from 8 to 40. The raw score is converted to a T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10; the results reported here are the T-scores. Higher scores mean fewer cognitive concerns.
Assessed and 4 and 8 weeks; the 8 week results are reported (primary outcome timepoint). The 6 month assessment was not conducted.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brian A Fallon, MD, Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 19, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 19, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

January 26, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Kundalini Yoga

3
Subscribe