Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acute Asthma Exacerbations

September 19, 2017 updated by: Michael Seear, University of British Columbia

A Prospective Open Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) Therapy Against Standard Therapy for Children Hospitalized With an Acute Exacerbation of Asthma Unresponsive to Inhaled Bronchodilators.

Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) is increasingly being reported as an effective and safe method of respiratory support for children with severe asthma exacerbations unresponsive to standard therapies and with impending respiratory failure. Much of the evidence base supporting its use comes from retrospective observational studies, and there is currently a lack of data from randomized controlled trials to inform this practice.

The investigators hypothesize that the use of BiPAP in children with moderate to severe asthma exacerbations could reduce the length of hospital stay, need for invasive ventilation, and use of intravenous bronchodilators. The investigators aim to test this hypothesis by randomizing children attending the Emergency Department with a moderate to severe clinical severity score refractory to inhaled bronchodilators to receive either BiPAP in addition to standard asthma care, or standard care alone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Children aged 2 - 18 years presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with a moderate or severe asthma exacerbation (Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) of > 3) who fail to improve clinically with standard ED management with inhaled salbutamol and ipratropium will be randomized to receive either standard asthma management according to our local severe asthma guideline or management with BiPAP in addition to standard care. Both groups will receive a comparable dose of systemic steroid and hourly salbutamol inhalers with subsequent weaning according to PRAM score. Patients randomized to receive BiPAP will be admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) and those randomized to the control group will be admitted to the medical ward. Both groups will be monitored with 3-hourly PRAM scoring through the duration of their admission.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6H 3V4
        • Children's and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 2-18 years old
  • Admitted to BC Children's Hospital with a clinical diagnosis of an acute asthma exacerbation
  • PRAM score of >3 following initial treatment with three rounds of inhaled salbutamol and ipratropium bromide, and one dose of systemic steroid
  • Parents willing and able to sign consent
  • Children over the age of 6 willing to provide assent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical suspicion of co-existing bacterial pneumonia: focal crackles or bronchial breathing, and/or major chest x-ray findings
  • Impending respiratory failure at presentation requiring direct PICU admission
  • Receiving maintenance dose of oral steroid at time of hospital admission
  • Any contraindication to BiPAP use including altered mental status, recent bowel surgery, intractable vomiting, or inability to protect airway
  • Current tracheostomy, home ventilation (IPPV or NIPPV) or home oxygen requirement
  • History of congenital heart disease or chronic respiratory disease (including bronchopulmonary dysplasia, cystic fibrosis, pulmonary hypertension)
  • Craniofacial abnormality precluding the use of a tight fitting facial mask

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: BiPAP plus standard care
Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) plus standard care according to the hospital's severe asthma protocol
Children in the intervention group will receive BiPAP (Trilogy, Philips Respironics; spontaneous trigger mode) via a nasal or full face mask. End expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) will be set at 5cm H20. Inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) will be titrated to achieve a tidal volume of 6 - 9 ml/kg. These settings will remain unchanged throughout the study period.
Other Names:
  • Trilogy BiPAP, Philips Respironics
Standard care according to the hospital severe asthma protocol
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard care alone
Standard care according to the hospital's severe asthma protocol
Standard care according to the hospital severe asthma protocol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) clinical severity score of ≤ 3 (mild)
Time Frame: Assessed at initiation, and 3-hourly thereafter until hospital discharge (an estimated average duration of 4 days)
PRAM score includes assessment of oxygen saturations, suprasternal retractions, scalene muscle contraction, air entry and wheezing.
Assessed at initiation, and 3-hourly thereafter until hospital discharge (an estimated average duration of 4 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intubation and complication rates
Time Frame: Patients will be followed for the duration of their hospital stay (an estimated average of 4 days) with data collection relative to this outcome on a daily basis
Number of children in each arm requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation, and experiencing significant treatment-related side effects
Patients will be followed for the duration of their hospital stay (an estimated average of 4 days) with data collection relative to this outcome on a daily basis
Hospital re-admission
Time Frame: Within 48 hours of initial hospital discharge
Number of children in each arm failing initial hospital discharge and requiring re-admission within 48 hours
Within 48 hours of initial hospital discharge
Inhaled bronchodilator utilization
Time Frame: Patients will be followed for the duration of their hospital stay (an estimated average of 4 days) with data collection relative to this outcome on a daily basis
Comparison of the median daily dose of inhaled salbutamol received by children in each arm,
Patients will be followed for the duration of their hospital stay (an estimated average of 4 days) with data collection relative to this outcome on a daily basis
Intravenous bronchodilator utilization
Time Frame: Patients will be followed for the duration of their hospital stay (an estimated average of 4 days) with data collection relative to this outcome on a daily basis
Comparison of the total number of hours of intravenous bronchodilator infusions received by children in each arm
Patients will be followed for the duration of their hospital stay (an estimated average of 4 days) with data collection relative to this outcome on a daily basis
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Length of stay will be calculated at the time of each child's hospital discharge (estimated 4 days after hospital admission and recruitment to study)
Duration of time from hospital admission to the patient meeting hospital discharge criteria
Length of stay will be calculated at the time of each child's hospital discharge (estimated 4 days after hospital admission and recruitment to study)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Seear, MD, University of British Columbia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 21, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) (Trilogy BiPAP, Philips Respironics)

3
Subscribe