CompuFlo® Assessment Study for the Epidural Space Verification (COMPASS)

CompuFlo® Assessment Study (COMPASS): A Randomized, Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter, Pivotal Study to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of the Epidural Space Verification With the CompuFlo® Epidural Computer Controlled System

The purpose of this pivotal study is to demonstrate safety and effectiveness of the CompuFlo® Epidural Computer Controlled System (referred to hereafter as CompuFlo® Epidural) for the epidural space verification.

The CompuFlo® Epidural System is limited by federal law for investigational use only in United States of America and has received CE mark in European Union.

Study Overview

• Status: Unknown
• Conditions: Verification of Needle Tip Placement in the Lumbar Epidural Space
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Active: Comparator Loss Of Resistance Syringe; Device: Experimental: CompuFlo® Epidural System

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 400
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • California
    • Irvine, California, United States, 92697
      • University of California Irvine
    • Rancho Mirage, California, United States, 92270
      • Vitamed Research
    • San Diego, California, United States, 92111
      • San Diego Pain Institute
  • Illinois
    • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
      • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
  • Texas
    • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
      • University of Texas Houston

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. The Subject is at least 18 years of age at screening, but has not had their 91st birthday.
2. The Subject is required to have epidural procedure implemented as part of their standard medical treatment according to Principal Investigator assessment.
3. The Subject is willing to undergo the Informed Consent process prior to enrollment into this study.
4. The Subject is willing to participate in this study for at least 30 days after the epidural procedure implementation.
5. The Subject is willing to participate in this study for at least 3 days after the procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Contraindications for epidural procedure / anesthesia (circumstances where the risks associated with epidural procedures are higher than usual. These circumstances include, but are not limited to anatomical abnormalities, such as spina bifida or scoliosis, infection at or near the site of insertion, allergy to the anesthetic or intended drug, uncorrected hypovolemia, increased intracranial pressure etc.).
2. Patients presenting for emergency c-section or other emergencies.
3. Exclusive use of other treatments such as intravenous analgesia with opioids.
4. Prior back surgery in lumbar area that would prevent epidural access.
5. Preexisting neurological deficit that would interfere with dermatome identification.
6. The Subject observed seizure within 7 days prior to study enrollment.
7. Presumed and/or confirmed septic embolus.
8. The Subject has a skin condition (i.e., hemangioma, scleroderma, psoriasis, rash, open wound or tattoo) in their lumbar region greater than 4 cm2.
9. The Subject previously participated in another investigational drug or device trial within the preceding 4 weeks.
10. Severe co-existing or terminal systemic disease that limits life expectancy or may interfere with study procedures.
11. The Subject is otherwise determined by the Investigator to be medically unsuitable for participation in this study.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: A Standard Care Group (SCG); Standard Care Conventional Group (SCG): 158 subjects to receive lumbar epidural procedure with the loss of resistance syringe used to identify the epidural space	Device: Active: Comparator Loss Of Resistance Syringe; Lumbar epidural procedure utilizing Loss of Resistance Syringe
Experimental: Experimental Procedure Group (EPG).; 158 of subjects to receive lumbar epidural procedure with the CompuFlo® Epidural System used to identify the epidural space	Device: Experimental: CompuFlo® Epidural System; CompuFlo® Epidural is intended for use with an epidural needle for the verification of needle tip placement in the lumbar epidural space

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Primary Effectiveness Objective (successful performance of lumbar epidural procedure)	Primary study endpoint is successful performance of lumbar epidural procedure indicated by loss to temperature sensation bilateral either 1) (i) in at least one dermatome for the non-labor procedures procedures or (ii) in at least two dermatomes for women in labor two dermatomes*, based on a maximum of 3 attempts at epidural space identificationor 2) by correct spread of dye in the epidural space as observed by fluoroscopy for those patients for whom fluoroscopy is performed as a standard medical procedure to identify the exact spine level (landmarking) along with confirmatory contrast dye, based on a maximum of 3 attempts at epidural space identification This is a binary categorical (yes/no) endpoint.	1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Milestone Scientific, Inc
• Investigators: Study Chair: Ralf Gebhard, MD, Professor of Anesthesiology Professor of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation Director, Division of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Perioperative Pain Management University of Miami-Miller School of Medicine

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: January 1, 2015
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): July 1, 2016
• Study Completion (Anticipated): July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 23, 2015
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 3, 2015
• First Posted (Estimate): March 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): July 6, 2016
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 1, 2016
• Last Verified: June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: EPI-INT14-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: Undecided