Comparison of Hemodynamics Between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Sedation in Patients With Abdominal Surgery

August 3, 2015 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

A Comparison of Hemodynamic Effects Between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Sedation in Patients With Major Abdominal Tumor Surgery

This is a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Patients undergoing abdominal tumor surgery were recruited to participate in the study. Apart from routine treatment in the surgical intensive care unit, the subjects were randomly divided into two groups: Propofol group (Group P) and Dexmedetomidine group (Group D) and received continuous intravenous infusion of Propofol (infusion dosage range: 0.3 ~ 1.6 mg/kg/h) or Dexmedetomidine (infusion dosage range: 0.1 ~ 0.7 mcg/kg/h) according to their assigned group. Patients' hemodynamic status was monitored using a chest Bioreactance technique, Continuous Non-Invasive Cardiac Output and Hemodynamic Monitor at preset time points (time of recruitment [0h], 2, 4, 6, 12h and 24h). Clinical data such as vital signs, hemodynamic parameters, laboratory results, fluid volume and drugs used were also recorded.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • non-emergent major abdominal tumor surgery with ICU admission
  • the need of sedation during ICU stay

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age older than 99 years
  • age younger than 20 years
  • refractory arrhythmias
  • refractory shock status after resuscitation
  • new onset of myocardial infarction
  • severe heart failure or NYHA 4
  • APACHE score > 30 when recruiting
  • severe liver cirrhosis or CHILD B or C
  • organ transplantation within one year
  • pregnancy
  • allergic to propofol or dexmedetomidine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: propofol
these patients are sedated with propofol infusion during ICU admission
Sedation
Other Names:
  • Propofol-Lipuro
Active Comparator: dexmedetomidine
these patients are sedated with dexmedetomidine infusion during ICU admission
Sedation
Other Names:
  • Precedex

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cardiac index
Time Frame: six hours after recruitment
the cardiac index measured by the Bioreactance-based noninvasive CO measurement (NICOM system) six hours after recruitment
six hours after recruitment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
mean arterial pressure
Time Frame: six hours after recruitment
six hours after recruitment
heart rate
Time Frame: six hours after recruitment
six hours after recruitment
stroke volume
Time Frame: six hours after recruitment
six hours after recruitment
urine output
Time Frame: six hours after recruitment
six hours after recruitment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yu-Chang Yeh, PhD, National Taiwan University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 19, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 5, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2015

Last Verified

August 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Propofol

Subscribe