Comparative Trial of IV Lacosamide Versus Phenytoin for Seizure Management

January 5, 2016 updated by: Jorge Burneo, Lawson Health Research Institute

Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Comparative Trial of IV Lacosamide Versus Phenytoin for Seizure Management

The Investigator plans to perform a prospective, randomized, single blinded, study that will compare patients treated with IV lacosamide to those treated with Phenytoin in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting. The investigator will also evaluate the rate of clinically evident and sub-clinical seizures, and to compare long-term outcomes between patients treated with lacosamide and those treated with Phenytoin.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
        • University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) or Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)
  • Admitted to the hospital less than 48 hours prior to randomization
  • Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score 3-8 (inclusive), or GCS motor score of five or less and abnormal CT scan showing intracranial pathology
  • Hemodynamically stable
  • Older than 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No IV access
  • Spinal cord injury
  • History of or CT confirmation of previous brain injury, including brain tumor, stroke, or a spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
  • Hemodynamically unstable
  • Suspected anoxia
  • Liver failure
  • Younger than 18 years of age
  • Pregnant
  • Allergy to phenytoin or lacosamide
  • Inability to obtain consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: lacosamide
The lacosamide group will receive a loading dose of 400 mg IV, and on maintenance dose of up to 400 mg every 12 hours.

Comparison of patients treated with IV lacosamide to those treated with phenytoin in the intensive care unit setting.

The lacosamide group will receive a loading dose of 400 mg IV, and on maintenance dose of up to 400 mg every 12 hours.

Other Names:
  • Vimpat
Active Comparator: phenytoin
the phenytoin group will receive a loading dose of 20 mg/K IV, maximum of 2000 mg, given over 60 min. and will be started on a maintenance dose of 5 mg/K/day. Levels will be checked accordingly.
the phenytoin group will receive a loading dose of 20 mg/K IV, maximum of 2000 mg, given over 60 min. and will be started on a maintenance dose of 5 mg/K/day.
Other Names:
  • Dilantin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Clinical Adverse Events
Time Frame: 6 months
Safety: the primary outcome measure will be the incidence of clinical adverse events. Patients will be evaluated daily during the hospital stay for seizures, fever, neurological changes, cardiovascular, hematologic and dermatologic abnormalities, liver failure, renal failure, and death. Each adverse event will be classified by the principal investigator as attributable or possibly attributable to the study drug versus other events. Serious adverse events for these to study will be defined as those that result in death, prolonged hospitalization, life threatening events, persistent or significant disability, or an important medical event that may not be immediately life threatening or result in death but based upon appropriate medical judgment may jeopardize the participant, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy
Time Frame: 6 months
Efficacy: the secondary endpoints will be seizure frequency and long-term outcomes (measure by disability scales). All patients will be monitored on continuous EEG for 72 hours or until a week and following commands. Since over 50% of initial seizure activity in these patients are usually subclinical as reported in the finished studies, and about 90% of the seizures happen within the first two days of admission to the ICU, the investigator would stop EEG recordings once patient awake, or by 72 hours after admission if there were no seizures.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jorge Burneo, MD, Lawson Health Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 6, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 7, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2016

Last Verified

January 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Seizures

Clinical Trials on lacosamide

3
Subscribe