Fall Prevention and Locomotion Recovery in Post-stroke Patients: A Multimodal Training

March 6, 2017 updated by: Simona Ferrante, Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri

The study proposes a novel rehabilitative program for the recovery of locomotor abilities in post-acute stroke patients. The hypothesis is that a rehabilitative program which involves a biofeedback cycling training combining voluntary effort and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) of the leg muscles, and a biofeedback balance training is superior to usual care in improving walking abilities, disability, motor performance, and independence of post-acute stroke patients. The innovative approach is to investigate whether interventions which do not directly involve locomotor functions but movements similar in terms of kinematic patterns and neural commands (e.g. pedaling), or aimed at recovering an essential prerequisite for walking, such as postural control during upright stance, may improve and/or accelerate the recovery of walking abilities.

A single-blind randomized controlled study is carried out. Participants are post-acute stroke patients experiencing a first stroke less than 6 months before recruitment, with an adult age, a low level of spasticity of the leg muscles (Modified Ashworth scale <2), no limitations at hip, knee, and ankle joints, and able to sit up to 30 minutes. Subjects are randomized to one of two groups, one performing the novel rehabilitative program in addition to usual care (experimental group), and one performing usual care alone (control group).

The experimental program consists of 15 sessions of FES-supported voluntary cycling training followed by 15 sessions of balance training. Both cycling and balance training are supported by a visual biofeedback in order to maximize patients' involvement in the exercise and are performed in addition to usual care.

The control group is involved in standard physical therapy which includes stretching, muscular conditioning, exercises for trunk control, standing, and walking training, and upper limb rehabilitation.

Both training programs last 6 weeks and patients are trained daily for about 90 minutes. Cycling and balance training last about 20 minutes; thus, patients in the experimental group perform only about 70 minutes of usual care.

Participants are evaluated at baseline (T1), after the end of the cycling training or after 3 weeks of usual care (post-treatment, T2), after the end of the whole intervention (post-treatment, T3), and about 6 months after the end of the intervention (follow-up, T4).

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

More details on the experimental training program are here provided.

The cycling training is performed on a motorized cycle-ergometer (MOTOmed, Reck GmbH) equipped with force sensors mounted at the base of the cranks (PowerForce system, Radlabor GmbH). The acquired force signals are displayed to the subjects who are asked to achieve a symmetrical involvement of the two legs. To deliver FES, a current-controlled 8-channel stimulator (RehaStim; Hasomed GmbH) is used and surface electrodes are applied in a bipolar configuration on the quadriceps, hamstrings, gastrocnemius lateralis, and tibialis anterior of both legs. Rectangular biphasic pulses with a pulse width of 400 μs and a stimulation frequency of 20 Hz are adopted. The stimulus intensity is set on each muscle the first day of training: for the paretic muscles values well tolerated by the subject and able to produce visibly good muscle contractions are identified, whereas for the healthy side lower values just above the sensory threshold are used. The stimulation timing is synchronized to the cycling movement according to physiological stereotyped activation patterns.

The balance training is performed during upright stance using a balance board (Balance board basic™, NeuroCom® International, Inc.). Subjects are asked to keep still or move their center of pressure following a target displayed on a screen in front of them.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • post-acute stroke patients experiencing a first stroke (both ischemic or hemorrhagic) less than 6 months before recruitment
  • low level of spasticity of the leg muscles (Modified Ashworth scale <2)
  • no limitations at hip, knee, and ankle joints
  • able to sit up to 30 minutes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neurological impairment (Mini mental scale <24)
  • presence of other neurological diseases
  • spatial hemineglect
  • cardiac pacemakers
  • allergy to electrodes
  • an inability to tolerate electrical stimulation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Biofeedback training

It consists of 15 daily sessions of voluntary cycling training augmented by functional electrical stimulation (FES) followed by 15 daily sessions of balance training (multimodal biofeedback training). Both cycling and balance training are supported by a visual biofeedback and last about 20 minutes.

In addition to cycling or balance training, subjects perform standard physical therapy in order to reach 90 minutes of training per day.

Voluntary cycling augmented by electrical stimulation and biofeedback
Other Names:
  • MOTOmed, Reck GmbH
  • PowerForce system, Radlabor GmbH
  • RehaStim; Hasomed GmbH
Balance control exercises with visual biofeedback
Other Names:
  • Balance board basic™, NeuroCom® International, Inc.
It consists of stretching, muscular conditioning, exercises for trunk control, standing, and walking training, and upper limb rehabilitation.
Active Comparator: Usual Care
It consists of 30 daily sessions of standard physical therapy. Each session last about 90 minutes.
It consists of stretching, muscular conditioning, exercises for trunk control, standing, and walking training, and upper limb rehabilitation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait Speed
Time Frame: "6 weeks"
Subjects are asked to walk three times at self-selected speed over the GaitRite mat using their walking aid (if any) or receiving the needed assistance. Spatial-temporal parameters are evaluated using the GaitRite software.
"6 weeks"

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait speed
Time Frame: "Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Subjects are asked to walk three times at self-selected speed over the GaitRite mat using their walking aid (if any) or receiving the needed assistance. Spatial-temporal parameters are evaluated using the GaitRite software.
"Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Aerobic capacity/endurance during gait assessed by 6-minute walking test
Time Frame: "Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Subjects are asked to walk along a rectilinear corridor for 6 minutes. The distance covered is measured.
"Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Motor power of the paretic lower extremity assessed by Motricity Index
Time Frame: "Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Italian version; Only leg-subscale of the paretic side
"Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Trunk Control assessed by Trunk Control Test
Time Frame: "Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Italian version
"Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Abilities during activities of daily life assessed by Functional Independence Measure
Time Frame: "Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Italian version
"Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Risk of fall assessed by Fall Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: "Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Italian version
"Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Balance control assessed by Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: "Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Italian version
"Day 0", "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Patient's perception of the effect of the intervention assessed by Global Perceived Effect
Time Frame: "6 weeks"
Italian version
"6 weeks"
Pedaling performance assessed by Pedaling test
Time Frame: "Day 0", "3 weeks","6 months+6 weeks"
A pedaling test is performed on the motorized cycle-ergometer to measure the force produced by the two sides during voluntary cycling as well as electromyography activations of the main lower limb muscles. Subjects are asked to pedal at four difference target pace (20 RPM, 30 RPM, 40 RPM, and 50 RPM), while the ergometer motor maintains a constant cadence of 10 RPM less than the target. A visual numerical cadence indicator and a metronome help the subjects to keep the constant cadence.
"Day 0", "3 weeks","6 months+6 weeks"
Balance performance assessed by Balance test
Time Frame: "3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"
Postural stability is evaluated using the commercial balance board exploited in the experimental intervention program (Balance board basic™, NeuroCom® International, Inc.). Pre-defined assessments are used to evaluate the postural sways during upright stance both with eyes open and closed; the limits of stability in all directions (forward, backward, right, and left); and the capability to shift the weight both left/right and forward/backward.
"3 weeks", "6 weeks", "6 months+6 weeks"

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Simona Ferrante, PhD, Politecnico di Milano

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 8, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Cycling

Subscribe