Comparison of Alendronate With Atorvastatin in Chronic Periodontitis

May 25, 2015 updated by: Dr. A R Pradeep, Government Dental College and Research Institute, Bangalore

Comparative Evaluation of Subgingivally Delivered 1% Alendronate Versus 1.2% Atorvastatin Gel in Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis: a Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial

The present study is designed as a single-centre, randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of two local drug delivery systems containing 1% ALN gel and 1.2% ATV gel in treatment of intrabony defects in patients with chronic periodontitis as an adjunct to SRP.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Alendronate and Atorvastatin are known to inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption and were proposed to have osteostimulative properties by causing osteoblast differentiation in vivo and in vitro as shown by an increase in matrix formation. The aim of the present study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of 1% ALN and 1.2% ATV gel as a local drug delivery system in adjunct to scaling and root planning (SRP) for the treatment of intrabony defects in patients with chronic periodontitis.

Methods: A total of 90 intrabony defects were treated with either1%ALN, 1.2% ATV or placebo gel. Clinical parameters (plaque index, modified sulcus bleeding index, probing depth [PD], and clinical attachment level [CAL]) were recorded at baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months. Radiographic parameters intrabony defect depth (IBD) and defect depth reduction (DDR%) was calculated on standardized radiographs by using image analysis software at 6 and 9 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

104

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Systemically healthy patients with PDs ≥5mm or CALs ≥4 to 6mm and vertical bone loss ≥3 mm on intraoral periapical radiographs with no history of periodontal therapy or use of antibiotics in the preceding 6 months were included

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a known systemic disease;
  • known or suspected allergy to the ALN/bisphosphonate group and ATV/statin group;
  • on systemic ALN/bisphosphonate and therapy ATV/statin group;
  • with aggressive periodontitis;
  • who used tobacco in any form;
  • alcoholics;
  • immunocompromised patients;
  • and pregnant or lactating females were excluded from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group
SRP plus placebo SRP was done for all the subjects. Placebo gel was delivered subgingivally into the pocket
After SRP, placebo gel was delivered subgingivally into the pocket
Active Comparator: Atorvastatin group
SRP plus Atorvastatin SRP was done for all the subjects. Atorvastatin was delivered in the pocket subgingivally
After SRP, Atorvastatin gel was delivered subgingivally into the pocket
Active Comparator: Alendronate Group
Alendronate SRP plus Alendronate SRP was done for all the subjects. Alendronate was delivered in the pocket subgingivally
After SRP, Alendronate gel was delivered subgingivally into the pocket

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in defect depth reduction from baseline to 6 months and from baseline to 9 months
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months and Baseline to 9 months
Radiographic defect depth reduction to measured at baseline, 6 and 9 months interval
Baseline to 6 months and Baseline to 9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plaque index
Time Frame: 3,6 and 9 months
Plaque index will be measured at 3, 6 and 9 months
3,6 and 9 months
Modified sulcus bleeding index
Time Frame: 3,6 and 9 months]
Modified sulcus bleeding index will be measured at 3, 6 and 9 months
3,6 and 9 months]
Probing pocket depth
Time Frame: 3,6 and 9 months]
Probing pocket depth will be measured at 3, 6 and 9 months
3,6 and 9 months]
Clinical attachment level
Time Frame: 3,6 and 9 months]
Clinical attachment level will be measured at 3, 6 and 9 months
3,6 and 9 months]

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 28, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 28, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Periodontitis

Clinical Trials on SRP and Placebo gel

3
Subscribe