Surgical Application of Vac Dressings In Obese Patients to Reduce Wound Complications (SAVIOR)

February 7, 2019 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

The SAVIOR Trial: Surgical Application of Vac Dressings In Obese Patients to Reduce Wound Complications

The purpose of this study is to determine whether application of an incisional wound Prevena trademark (TM) dressing (applies negative pressure to wounds) in the obese (BMI ≥30) surgical patient will reduce surgical site infections (SSI) when compared to the standard of care dressing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In an attempt to decrease wound infection incidence and improve healing time of open surgical wounds, vacuum assisted closure (VAC) was developed. This innovative technique provided contained controlled wound irrigation without bacterial aerosolization. A newer customizable subset of the Prevena incision Management System TM called Prevena Peel and Place TM has been released a few months ago. The new model can be cut to specific wound sizes and has a connector that can be attached to the already widely available VAC machines. The versatility and the comparability to older models of Prevena Peel and Place TM have not been tested to this date.

The investigators believe that a randomized clinical trial evaluating the use of the Prevena Incision Management System TM for homecare and the use of Prevena Peel and Place TM for inpatients in special populations is warranted. Obese patients (BMI≥30) undergoing open surgery will have decreased surgical site infection rates, improved healing time, better quality of life (QOL) and lower readmission rates with use of Prevena in the post-operative management of surgical incisions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has been informed of the nature of the study, and has provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB) / Medical Ethics Committee (MEC) of the respective clinical site.
  • Patient meets the criteria for and is undergoing open surgery at Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes.
  • Patient with BMI≥ 30 at the time of surgery
  • Patient agrees to return for all required clinical follow up for the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergic reaction to acrylic adhesives or silver.
  • Known history of intolerance to any component of Prevena Incision Management System TM.
  • Very fragile skin around incision site.
  • Bleeding disorder or refuses blood transfusion.
  • Malignancy or other condition limiting life expectancy to <5 years.
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Prevena
After surgery this group will receive the Prevena device (negative pressure wound therapy).
Prevena Incision Management system
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard dressing
After surgery this group will receive standard of care dressings on their surgical wound.
This involves standard of care dressing including but not limited to gauze.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical Site Infection According to National Healthcare Safety Network - Center for Disease Control Guidelines
Time Frame: Up to 7 days postop
The incidence of postoperative surgical site infection (according to National Healthcare Safety Network - Center for Disease Control guidelines) in open surgery
Up to 7 days postop

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Other Wound Complications (Aggregate)
Time Frame: Up to 14 days postop
Dehiscence, seroma and hematoma. Reported as number of aggregate events.
Up to 14 days postop
Skin Bacterial Count as Assessed by Microbacterial Count
Time Frame: Up to 7 days postop
Skin bacterial count after removal of either Prevena or standard dressing. A micro-bacterial swap will be performed and sent to the microbiology lab for assessing bacterial count
Up to 7 days postop
Physical Function as Assessed by Short Form Survey (SF) 36
Time Frame: Up to 14 days postop
The SF -36 has eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0 - 100. Lower scores = more disability, higher scores = less disability
Up to 14 days postop
Readmissions
Time Frame: Up to 30 days postop
Readmission events for the patients.
Up to 30 days postop
Role Limitations Due to Physical Health as Assessed by Short Form Survey (SF) 36
Time Frame: Up to 14 days postop
The SF -36 has eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0 - 100. Lower scores = more disability, higher scores = less disability
Up to 14 days postop
Social Functioning as Assessed by Short Form Survey (SF) 36
Time Frame: Up to 14 days postop
The SF -36 has eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0 - 100. Lower scores = more disability, higher scores = less disability
Up to 14 days postop
Energy / Fatigue as Assessed by Short Form Survey (SF) 36
Time Frame: Up to 14 days postop
The SF -36 has eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Energy and fatigue are aggregated in this section. Scores range from 0 - 100. Lower scores = more disability, higher scores = less disability
Up to 14 days postop
Emotional Well Being as Assessed by Short Form Survey (SF) 36
Time Frame: Up to 14 days postop
The SF -36 has eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0 - 100. Lower scores = more disability, higher scores = less disability
Up to 14 days postop
Pain as Assessed by Short Form Survey (SF) 36
Time Frame: Up to 14 days postop
The SF -36 has eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0 - 100. Lower scores = more disability, higher scores = less disability
Up to 14 days postop
General Health as Assessed by Short Form Survey (SF) 36
Time Frame: Up to 14 days postop
The SF -36 has eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0 - 100. Lower scores = more disability, higher scores = less disability
Up to 14 days postop

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kimberley Steele, MD, PHD, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Prevena

3
Subscribe