Low-dose Recombinant Human IL-2 for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

July 31, 2019 updated by: Zhanguo Li, Peking University People's Hospital

A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Pilot-study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Low-dose hrIL-2 in the Treatment of Methotrexate (MTX)-Naive Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease, characterized by symmetric poly-arthritis usually involving the small joints of the hands and feet. In addition, various extra-joint manifestations may develop. Several immunomodulating agents have been attempted in the treatment of RA without achieving satisfactory results. Dysfunction of regulatory T (Treg) cells has been detected in diverse autoimmune diseases, which can be promoted by interleukin-2 (IL-2). The investigators hypothesized that low-dose IL-2 could be a novel therapy in active RA patients. This clinical study will test the efficacy and safety of low dose IL-2 treatment in RA. The investigators perform a single-centre, double-blind pilot trial with hrIL-2 in RA. The investigators evaluate the effectiveness and safeness of low-dose hrIL-2 for RA by randomized controlled study (hrIL-2 (N = 23) + Methotrexate (MTX)+ Loxoprofen versus placebo+MTX + Loxoprofen group (N = 24)).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Each RA patients (n=47) with DAS>3.2 received low-dose IL-2+MTX+ Loxoprofen or placebo+MTX + Loxoprofen (active group: placebo group =1:1, 1 million units every other day subcutaneously (hrIL-2 1×106, ip, Qod) for a period of 14 days. After a 14-day rest, another cycle started) for 3 cycles. The end points were safety and clinical and immunologic response.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100044
        • Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University People's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female ≥18 and ≤70 years of age at time of screening
  • Diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis
  • Must have active disease with DMARDs (Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs) except MTX, the doses had been stable for at least 3 months before baseline
  • Moderate or severe rheumatoid arthritis during screening, as defined by a disease activity score (28 joint) calculated using the C-reactive protein formula (DAS28-ESR) > 3.2
  • Have given written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient presenting or having a history of other inflammatory joint disease
  • Patient with ongoing or previous Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis or erythema multiforme
  • Patient with significantly impaired bone marrow function or significant anaemia, leucopenia or thrombocytopenia due to causes or other than active rheumatoid arthritis
  • Persistent infection or severe infection within 3 months before enrollment,
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes, unstable ischemic heart disease, active inflammatory bowel disease, active peptic ulcer disease, terminal illness or other medical condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the patient at risk to participate in the study,
  • Clinically relevant cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological, endocrine, or other major systemic disease making implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study results difficult
  • Severe hypoproteinemia (e.g., in case of severe liver disease or nephrotic syndrome) with serum albumin < 30 g/L
  • Moderate or severe impairment of renal function, as known by serum creatinine > 133μmol/L (or 1.5 mg/dl)
  • Patient with history of recent and clinically significant drug or alcohol abuse
  • Impairment of liver function or persisting ALT (SGPT) elevations of more than 2-fold the upper limit of normal
  • Known HIV positive status
  • Known positive serology for hepatitis B or C
  • Patient with hypersensitivity to any of the excipients in the tablets of methotrexate
  • Pregnancy
  • Breastfeeding
  • Women of childbearing potential, except if they fulfill specific conditions,
  • Men wishing to father children during the course of the study or within the 24 months thereafter (or 3 month with the washout procedure)
  • Patient with a congenital or acquired severe immuno-deficiency, a history of cancer or lymphoproliferative disease, or any patient who has received total lymphoid irradiation.
  • Enrollment in any other clinical trial involving off-label use of an investigational drug or device, or enrollment in any other type of medical research
  • Any active infection (including chronic or localized infections) for which anti-infectives were indicated within 28 days prior to first investigational product dose
  • BMI(body mass index) under 18.5 kg/m2 or more than 30 kg/m2
  • The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Experimental
hrIL-2 active (1 million U doses of hrIL-2s.c.injection) MTX Folic acid Loxoprofen
hrIL-2 active (1 million U doses of hrIL-2s.c.injection)
Other Names:
  • Human recombinant IL-2
Methotrexate (oral administration)
Folic Acid (oral administration)
Loxoprofen (oral administration)
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Comparator
hrIL-2 placebo (1 million U doses of placebo s.c.injection) MTX Folic acid Loxoprofen
Methotrexate (oral administration)
Folic Acid (oral administration)
Loxoprofen (oral administration)
hrIL-2 placebo (1 million U doses of hrIL-2 placebo s.c.injection)
Other Names:
  • placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission.
Time Frame: week 24
DAS 28 remission is defined by a disease activity score (28 joint) calculated using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) of less than 2.6
week 24
Percentage of Participants Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% Response Criteria
Time Frame: week 12, week 24
The assessments are based on a 20% or greater improvement from Baseline in the number of tender joints, a 20%, or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 20% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
week 12, week 24
The Change From Baseline of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)
Time Frame: week 12, week 24

Clinical Disease Activity Index(CDAI), the minimum is 0, the maximum is 76. higher scores mean a worse outcome.

The change of from baseline of CDAI, the minimum is -76, the maximum is 76. higher scores mean a worse outcome.

week 12, week 24
The Change From Baseline of Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)
Time Frame: week 12, week 24

Simplified Disease Activity Index(SDAI). the minimum is 0, the maximum is 96. higher scores mean worse outcome.

The change from baseline of SDAI. the minimum is -96, the maximum is 96. higher scores mean worse outcome.

week 12, week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to week 24
adverse events includes injection site reactions, influenza-like symptoms, infection, fever, tumor, cardiovascular event, drug-induced liver and kidney damage.
Up to week 24
Percentage of CD4+ Treg Cells
Time Frame: week 12, week 24
analysis regulatory CD4+ T(Treg) cells before and during IL-2 treatment. P values<0.05 are considered statistically significant.
week 12, week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Low Disease Activity.
Time Frame: week 12, week 24
Low disease activity is defined by a disease activity score (28 joint) calculated using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) of less than 3.2
week 12, week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response
Time Frame: week 12, week 24

Good response is defined as: DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2 and decrease from Baseline by > 1.2.

moderate response is defined as achievement of one of the following: DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2 and decrease from Baseline > 0.6 and ≤ 1.2 DAS28-ESR > 3.2 and ≤ 5.1 and decrease from Baseline > 0.6 DAS28-ESR > 5.1 and decrease from Baseline >1.2.

week 12, week 24
Percentage of Participants Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50% Response Criteria
Time Frame: week 12, week 24
The assessments are based on a 50% or greater improvement from Baseline in the number of tender joints, a 50%, or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 50% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
week 12, week 24
Percentage of Participants Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70% Response Criteria
Time Frame: week 12, week 24
The assessments are based on a 70% or greater improvement from Baseline in the number of tender joints, a 70%, or more improvement in the number of swollen joints, and a 70% or greater improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA), Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), physical function as assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
week 12, week 24
Percentage of Participants Meeting the 2011 American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Remission Criteria Simplified for Clinical Practice
Time Frame: week 12, week 24
The 2011 ACR/EULAR remission criteria simplified for clinical practice is defined as:Tender Joint Count (TJC) ≤ 1, Swollen Joint Count (SJC) ≤ 1 and Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA) ≤ 1.
week 12, week 24
The Change From Baseline of a Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
Time Frame: week 12, week 24

The domains of the HAQ-DI are dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. The total score ranges from 0 to 3 with lower scores meaning lower disability.

The change from baseline of HAQ-DI, minimum is -3, the maximum is 3. higher scores mean a worse outcome.

week 12, week 24
The Scores of SF-36 Quetionnaire
Time Frame: week 12, week 24
Score ranging from 0 to 100 with higher scores a better outcome.
week 12, week 24
Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]
Time Frame: week 24
The Arthritis interference in the last month with work productivity is measured on a scale that ranges from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). The Arthritis interference in the last month with household work productivity is measured on a scale that ranges from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference).higher scores mean a worse outcome.
week 24
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Time Frame: week 12, week 24
week 12, week 24
C Reactive Protein (CRP)
Time Frame: week 12, week 24
week 12, week 24
The Change From Baseline of Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGADA)
Time Frame: week 12, week 24
VAS score from 0 to 100 for Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Higher scores mean a worse outcome. The change from baseline of PtGADA, the minimum is -100, the maximum is 100. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
week 12, week 24
The Change From Baseline of Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA)
Time Frame: week 12, week 24
VAS score from 0 to 100 for Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity higher scores mean a worse outcome. The change from baseline, the minimum is -100, the maximum is 100.
week 12, week 24
The Change From Baseline of Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP)
Time Frame: week 12, week 24
VAS score from 0 to 100 for Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain higher scores mean a worse outcome. The change from baseline of PtAAP, the minimum is -100, the maximum is 100.
week 12, week 24
Work Productivity Survey - Rheumatoid Arthritis [WPS-RA]-2
Time Frame: week 24
In the last month, number of work days missed, number of work days with reduced productivity. In the last month, number of days with no household work, number of days with reduced household work productivity, number of days with hired outside help, number of days missed of family/social/leisure activities in the last month.higher scores mean a worse outcome.
week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zhanguo Li, MD PhD, Peking University Institute of Rheuamotology and Immunology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on hrIL-2 active

Subscribe