Strong Hearts: Rural CVD Prevention

April 15, 2020 updated by: Cornell University

Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities: A Rural Community CVD Prevention Program

Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities is a research study which aims to reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD), improve quality of life, and reduce CVD related health care costs in rural communities.

The investigators' aim is to better understand how changes in lifestyle can affect the health of rural women and others in their communities.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There are notable cardiovascular disease (CVD) disparities among people living in rural settings, particularly medically underserved rural areas. Complex factors such as socioeconomic disadvantage, social and cultural dynamics, geographic distances/barriers, and limited access to healthcare, healthy foods, and/or physical activity opportunities contribute to the issue. The objective of Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities (SHHC) is to reduce rural CVD disparities through civic engagement and implementation of a community-based intervention in 16 underserved rural towns. In Montana, SHHC builds upon a long-standing collaboration with National Institute of Food and Agriculture cooperative extension educators, who will implement the project. SHHC in New York will work with a health care system to implement the project. There is limited knowledge about how programs and services can move beyond commonly used individual-level approaches-which have limitations in terms of cost, impact, reach, and sustainability-to effectively reduce rural CVD health disparities using an integrated, multi-level, community-engaged approach. The objective of Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities (SHHC) is to address this gap in knowledge and practice by working with residents, practitioners, health educators, local leadership, and other stakeholders in 16 medically underserved rural towns to develop and test a comprehensive program designed to: a) improve diet and physical activity behaviors, b) promote local built environment resources, and c) shift social norms about active living and healthy eating through civic engagement, capacity building, and community-based programming.

FORMATIVE RESEARCH (STAGE1: Completed) The investigators conducted community audits, focus groups, and key informant interviews with members of the above key groups to gather in-depth data about a number of topics related to CVD awareness and risk factors. These topics included: economic, healthcare, and social/cultural factors, as well as, barriers and facilitators to healthy eating and active living. The community audit and qualitative data gathered during the formative research, as well as, feedback from extension educators and the National Advisory Board has informed and been incorporated in the development and refinement of the SHHC curriculum.

RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED INTERVENTION (STAGE 2) In the second phase of the project, the investigators will evaluate the efficacy of the SHHC curriculum in a 24-week community based randomized controlled intervention trial. The investigators will compare changes in CVD-related anthropometric, physiologic, behavioral, and psychosocial parameters between subjects in 8 intervention and 8 control communities. In addition, the investigators will evaluate changes in behavior, attitudes, and knowledge among SHHC intervention subjects' "social network".

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

194

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Montana
      • Broadus, Montana, United States, 59317
        • Broadus
      • Chinook, Montana, United States, 59523
        • Chinook
      • Choteau, Montana, United States, 59422
        • Choteau
      • Columbus, Montana, United States, 59019
        • Columbus
      • Forsyth, Montana, United States, 59327
        • Forsyth
      • Glasgow, Montana, United States, 59230
        • Glasgow
      • Harlowton, Montana, United States, 59036
        • Harlowton
      • Hinsdale, Montana, United States, 59241
        • Hinsdale
      • Lewistown, Montana, United States, 59457
        • Lewistown
      • Plentywood, Montana, United States, 59254
        • Plentywood
      • Shelby, Montana, United States, 59474
        • Shelby
      • Thompson Falls, Montana, United States, 59873
        • Thompson Falls
    • New York
      • Cherry Valley, New York, United States, 13320
        • Cherry Valley
      • Little Falls, New York, United States, 13365
        • Little Falls
      • Saint Johnsville, New York, United States, 13452
        • St. Johnsville
      • Sidney, New York, United States, 13838
        • Sidney

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

38 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Not currently physically active
  • BMI greater than or equal to 25
  • Blood pressure is less than 160/100 mm Hg
  • Heart rate is between 60-100 bpm
  • English-speaking
  • Able and willing to obtain physician's approval to participate in either intervention
  • Willing to participate in assessment activities
  • Willing to make a firm commitment to participate in either intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently physically active
  • Body Mass Index less than 25
  • Untreated hypertension
  • Heart rate lower than 60 or higher than 100 bpm
  • Non-English speaking
  • Not able or willing to obtain physician's approval to participate
  • Not interested or willing to participate in assessment activities
  • Not able or willing to make a firm commitment to participate in either intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities
Full Intervention participants will meet twice per week for one hour each time, for approximately 6 months plus monthly community meetings and events. Participants will learn and practice good nutrition and physical activity for improved individual, family and community health.
We will evaluate the efficacy of the SHHC curriculum in a 24-week community-based randomized controlled intervention trial. We will compare changes in CVD-related anthropometric, physiologic, behavioral, and psychosocial parameters between subjects in 8 intervention and 8 control communities. In addition, we will evaluate changes in behavior, attitudes, and knowledge among SHHC intervention subjects' "social network".
Other Names:
  • Strong Hearts for Montana
  • Full intervention
Experimental: Strong Hearts, Healthy Women
Strong Hearts, Healthy Women minimum intervention participants meet once per month for an hour each time for 6 months. Participants will learn and discuss techniques and strategies to improve personal health.

The Strong Hearts, Healthy Women (minimal intervention) will meet once per month for an hour each time for 6 months.

Participants will learn and discuss techniques and strategies to improve personal health.

Other Names:
  • Minimal intervention
  • Strong Hearts for Montana

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in body weight
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months, 6-month follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Baseline to 6 months, 6-month follow-up, and 18-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months, 6-month follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Baseline to 6 months, 6-month follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Changes in lipids
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months, 6-month follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Baseline to 6 months, 6-month follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Changes in c-reactive protein
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months, 6-month follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Baseline to 6 months, 6-month follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Changes in hemoglobin A1C
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months, 6-month follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Baseline to 6 months, 6-month follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Changes in waist circumference
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 6-month follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 6-month follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Changes in 7-day accelerometry
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months, 6-month follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Baseline to 6 months, 6-month follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Changes in 7-day dietary recall
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months, 6-month follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Baseline to 6 months, 6-month follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Changes in healthy eating self-efficacy assessed by questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 6-month follow-up, one-year follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 6-month follow-up, one-year follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Changes in exercise self-efficacy assessed by questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 6-month follow-up, one-year follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 6-month follow-up, one-year follow-up, and 18-month follow-up
Changes in healthy eating attitudes of social network of participants assessed by questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months and 6-month follow-up
Baseline to 6 months and 6-month follow-up
Changes in exercise attitudes of social network of participants assessed by questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months and 6-month follow-up
Baseline to 6 months and 6-month follow-up
Changes in healthy eating self-efficacy of social network of participants assessed by questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months and 6-month follow-up
Baseline to 6 months and 6-month follow-up
Changes in exercise self-efficacy of social network of participants assessed by questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months and 6-month follow-up
Baseline to 6 months and 6-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rebecca Seguin, PhD, Cornell University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 16, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB #: 1402004505

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Strong Hearts, Healthy Communities

3
Subscribe