Adductor Canal Block With Continuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Boluses and Morphine Consumption

April 27, 2017 updated by: Pia Jaeger

Adductor Canal Block With Continuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Boluses and Morphine Consumption: A Randomized, Triple-masked, Controlled Study

The investigators believe sufficient spread to all nerves within the adductor canal-and thereby sufficient analgesia-can only be obtained by bolus injections and not by continuous infusions via a catheter. The aim of the study is to investigate whether an adductor canal block performed as repeated intermittent boluses provides superior pain relief to continuous infusion. The investigators hypothesize that adductor canal block performed as intermittent boluses via a catheter will reduce morphine consumption and pain as well as enhance ambulation and muscle strength compared with continuous infusion.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hellerup
      • Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark, 2900
        • Department of Anaesthesia-Surgery-Intensive Care, Gentofte Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty in spinal anesthesia
  • Patients who gave their written informed consent to participating in the study after having fully understood the contents of the protocol and restrictions
  • American society of anesthesiologists 1-3
  • Ability to perform a timed up and go test preoperatively

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who cannot cooperate
  • Patients who cannot understand or speak Danish.
  • Patients with allergy to the medicines used in the study
  • Patients with a daily intake of strong opioids (morphine, oxycodone, ketobemidone, methadone, fentanyl) during the last 4 weeks
  • Patients suffering from alcohol and/or drug abuse - based on the investigator's assessment
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • BMI > 40
  • Neuromuscular pathology in the lower limbs
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intermittent bolus
ropivacaine 0.2%, 21 ml every 3 hours
Adductor canal block. Placed immediately postoperative. Intervention stops on POD2 12PM
Active Comparator: Continuous infusion
ropivacaine 0.2%, 7ml/h
Adductor canal block. Placed immediately postoperative. Intervention stops on POD2 12PM

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total opioid consumption
Time Frame: 2 days postoperative
Difference in total opioid consumption (patient controlled analgesia pump and any potential rescue administration) between groups, from end of surgery until 12 pm on postoperative day (POD) 2.
2 days postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pains scores during knee flexion as assessed by the Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 days postoepratively
Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores (0-100 mm) during 45 degrees active knee flexion analyzed using a linear mixed model with the inclusion of all time points (Day of surgery (DOS): 8 pm, POD 1: 8 am, 12 pm, 8 pm, POD 2: 8 am and 12 pm).
2 days postoepratively
Pain at rest as assessed by the VAS pain scores
Time Frame: 2 days postoperatively
VAS pain scores (0-100 mm) at rest analyzed using a linear mixed model with the inclusion of all time points (DOS: 8 pm, POD 1: 8 am, 12 pm, 8 pm, POD 2: 8 am and 12 pm).
2 days postoperatively
Pain during the Timed Up and Go test as assessed by the VAS
Time Frame: 1 and 2 days postoperatively
Worst pain (VAS, 0-100 mm) during the Timed Up and Go test at 12 pm on POD 1 and 2.
1 and 2 days postoperatively
Quadriceps strength assessed as maximum voluntary isometric contraction in percentage of preoperative baseline values at 12 pm on POD 1 and 2
Time Frame: 1 and 2 days postoperatively
Quadriceps strength assessed as maximum voluntary isometric contraction in percentage of preoperative baseline values at 12 pm on POD 1 and 2.
1 and 2 days postoperatively
Timed Up and Go test
Time Frame: 1 and 2 days postoperatively
Time (seconds) to perform the Timed Up and Go test at 12 pm on POD 1 and 2.
1 and 2 days postoperatively
Number of patients able to perform the Timed Up and Go test
Time Frame: 1 and 2 days postoperatively
Number of patients able to perform the Timed Up and Go test at 12 pm on POD 1 and 2.
1 and 2 days postoperatively
6 min walk test
Time Frame: 1 and 2 days postoperativley
Distance ambulated (m) during the 6 min walk test performed at 12 pm on POD 1 and 2.
1 and 2 days postoperativley

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on ropivacaine 0.2%

Subscribe