Denosumab vs Placebo in Patients With Thalassemia Major and Osteoporosis

August 21, 2019 updated by: Ersi Voskaridou

Evaluation of Efficacy of Denosumab in Patients With Thalassemia Major and Osteoporosis: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Single-site, Double Blind Phase 2b Clinical Trial

This is a single-site, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind phase 2b clinical trial. Patients with Thalassemia will participate in this study and will be treated with Denosumab or placebo. The effect of Denosumab on lumbar spine BMD in patients with Thalassemia Major and Osteoporosis will be evaluated as compared with control (placebo) at 12 months.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a single-site, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind phase 2b clinical trial. Patients with Thalassemia and Bone Mass Density (BMD) T-score between -2.5 and - 4.0 in at least one of the examined sites will participate in this study and will be treated with Denosumab or placebo.

Patients will be assigned into two (2) treatment groups:

  • In Group A, 60 mg Denosumab will be administered sc, every 6 months for 12 months for a total of 2 doses (day 0 and day 180).
  • In Group B placebo will be administered sc, every 6 months for 12 months for a total of 2 doses (day 0 and day 180) (Appendix I and Appendix II).

Patients will be randomly assigned, in a 1:1 fashion, to the two therapeutic arms (Group A, Group B, respectively), upon enrollment in the study.

The effect of Denosumab on lumbar spine BMD (bone mineral density) in patients with Thalassemia Major and Osteoporosis as compared with control at 12 months will be evaluated. Also the effect on femoral neck and wrist bone BMD, on markers of bone remodeling and the safety profile will be evaluated as well. All subjects will receive a subcutaneous injection of Denosumab or placebo administered by a health care professional on days 0 and 180 (±3).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Attica
      • Athens, Attica, Greece, 11526
        • General Hospital of Athens "Laikon"

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (>30 years of age) described as skeletally mature subjects
  • Thalassemia Major
  • Low BMD (T-score <-2.5) in one of the 3 studied sites (lumbar spine, femoral neck, wrist).
  • Have signed the informed consent form (consent should be taken before any study-specific procedure is performed).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMD T-score < -4.0 in one of the 2 studied sites (lumbar spine, femoral neck).
  • Previous administration of denosumab from clinical trials or others (e.g. commercial use).
  • Current participation in another clinical trial or having received any investigational product within the last 3 months.
  • Impaired renal function as determined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≤ 30 mL/min (using the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology, ((CKD-EPI) formula).
  • Patients with sickle cell disease.
  • Known to have a liver failure or chronic hepatic disease e.g. cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis; or elevated transaminases defined as Alanine Transaminase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Transaminase (AST) > 2 fold the upper limit of normal laboratory range.
  • Heart failure (NYHA above 2).
  • Patients with life expectancy of less than one year.
  • Subject refuses to use a reliable contraceptive method (oral contraceptives, progesterone implants, intrauterine device, condoms) throughout the study by women of childbearing potential. Women of childbearing potential agree to use 2 highly effective forms of contraception and to continue this practice for 7 months after last injection of study medication.
  • Pregnancy, planning a pregnancy or currently lactating
  • Severe concurrent illness which in the investigator's opinion may confound patient evaluation, e.g. malignancy (except basal cell carcinoma, cervical or breast ductal carcinoma in situ) within the last 5 years.
  • Known alcohol or drug abuse or any other condition associated with poor compliance
  • Patients that have received oral bisphosphonates within 6 months of study enrollment or intravenous bisphosphonates, fluoride and strontium ranelate within 1 year of study enrollment.
  • Parathormone (PTH), PTH derivatives, teriparatide, odanacatib, anabolic steroids, testosterone, glucocorticosteroids (> 5 mg/day of prednisone equivalent for > 10 days), systemic hormone-replacement therapy, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), raloxifene, tibolone, calcitonin or calcitriol use within the last 6 weeks.
  • Evidence of hyper- or hypothyroidism; patients with an abnormal Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level on thyroid treatment (patients on stable thyroid treatment with a normal TSH allowed); current hyper- or hypoparathyroidism; current hyper or hypocalcemia (hypocalcemia based on albumin adjusted serum calcium < 8.5 mg/dL); vitamin D deficiency (25-hydroxy Vitamin D level < 12 ng/mL; if repeat 12-20 ng/mL after repletion, subject will be allowed); rheumatoid arthritis; Paget's disease; bone disease that would interfere with interpretation of findings.
  • Known sensitivity to mammalian cell-derived drug products.
  • History of any Solid Organ or Bone Marrow Transplant
  • History of osteonecrosis of the jaw, and/or recent tooth extraction or other dental surgery; or planned invasive dental work during the study.
  • Intolerance to calcium supplements.
  • Malabsorption syndrome; severe malabsorption including Celiac disease, Short Bowel Syndrome, Crohn's disease, Previous Gastric Bypass.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Denosumab
In Group A, 60 mg Denosumab will be administered sc, every 6 months for 12 months for a total of 2 doses (day 0 and day 180)

Patients will be randomly assigned, in a 1:1 fashion, to the two therapeutic arms (Group A, Group B, respectively), upon enrollment in the study.

The effect of denosumab on lumbar spine BMD (bone mineral density) in patients with Thalassemia Major and Osteoporosis as compared with control at 12 months will be evaluated.

Other Names:
  • Prolia
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
In Group B placebo will be administered sc, every 6 months for 12 months for a total of 2 doses (day 0 and day 180)

Patients will be randomly assigned, in a 1:1 fashion, to the two therapeutic arms (Group A, Group B, respectively), upon enrollment in the study.

The effect of denosumab on lumbar spine BMD (bone mineral density) in patients with Thalassemia Major and Osteoporosis as compared with control at 12 months will be evaluated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percent change in the lumbar spine BMD
Time Frame: 12 months
The primary objective is to evaluate the effect of Denosumab (plus vitamin D & calcium) on lumbar spine BMD in patients with Thalassemia Major and Osteoporosis as compared with control (placebo plus vitamin D & calcium) at 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percent change in BMD of the total hip and femoral neck
Time Frame: 12 months
To evaluate the effect of Denosumab (plus vitamin D & calcium) on femoral neck and wrist bone BMD in patients with Thalassemia Major and Osteoporosis as compared with control (placebo plus vitamin D & calcium) at 12 months
12 months
The percent change in BMD at the distal third radius
Time Frame: 12 months
To evaluate the effect of Denosumab (plus vitamin D & calcium) on femoral neck and wrist bone BMD in patients with Thalassemia Major and Osteoporosis as compared with control (placebo plus vitamin D & calcium) at 12 months
12 months
The percent change in serum C-Termina Telopeptide (sCTX) at Month 3 post injection
Time Frame: 3 months
To evaluate the effect of Denosumab on markers of bone remodeling of patients with Thalassemia Major and Osteoporosis.
3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse event incidence by system organ class and preferred term
Time Frame: 12 months
Seventeen cases of adverse events were reported. 14/17 were classified as mild(grade 1). 3/14 mild adverse eents concerned the placebo group. 11/14 of the mild adverse events concerned abnormalities of blood or biochemical testing. Only 3 of them had headache, diarrhea and fever. Three serious adverse events in denosumab group were pleural effusion(grade 3), supraventricular tachycardia(grade 4) and atrial fibrillation (grade3). These all three events were defined as unrelated to study drug.
12 months
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Time Frame: 12 months

To evaluate the safety profile of Denosumab in patients with Thalassemia Major and Osteoporosis.

Hematological parameters: Hemoglobin (Hb), White blood cell number (WBC) and platelets number

Biochemical parameters: ALT U/L, AST U/L, Alkaline phosphatase IU/L, CPK IU/L, Calcium mg/dL, Creatinine mg/dL, Direct bilirubin mg/dL, LDH U/L, Phosphate mg/dL, Total bilirubin mg/dL, Total protein g/dL, Urea mg/dL, Uric acid mg/dL, albumin g/dL, ferritin ng/mL, glucose mg/dL, iron μg/dL, magnesium mg/dL, potassium mEq/L, sodium mEq/L, γGT IU/L.

12 months
Changes in general appearance at each visit
Time Frame: 12 months
General appearance of the patients will be assessed at each visit as "normal" of "affected".
12 months
Changes in skin contour at each visit
Time Frame: 12 months
At each visit all patients will be evaluated for potential changes in skin contour and will be classified as i) normal or pale and ii) icteric or non-icteric
12 months
Changes in cardiology clinical examination at each visit
Time Frame: 12 months
At each visit all patients will be evaluated for potential changes in heart clinical examination assessed by auscultation that will be classified as normal or abnormal
12 months
Changes in ECG at each visit
Time Frame: 12 months
At each visit all patients will be evaluated for ECG changes regarding the cardiac rhythm, the cardiac rate, the P Wave, the PR Interval, the QRS Complex, the QT Interval, and will be classified as normal or abnormal.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ersi Voskaridou, Doctor, General Hospital of Athens "Laikon"

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis

Clinical Trials on Denosumab

3
Subscribe