- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02565303
Minimum Effective Dose of Ropivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
Minimum Effective Dose of Intrathecal Ropivacaine Required for Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison Between L2-3 and L3-4 Approach
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Some unexpected adverse reactions such as respiratory depression, vomiting, especially supine hypotensive syndrome could caused by a high dose of anesthetic in cesarean section. The investigators assumed that there be a minimum effective dose that will be associated with the best possible performance of ropivacaine for different intervertebral spaces(L2-3 and L3-4 in usual). That maybe enhance the comfort of parturient and safety of fetus.
This study is conducted as a prospective, randomized, up-down sequential dose of isobaric ropivacaine in 3 mL that will provide effective analgesia for 50% of parturients in cesarean section. The investigators use the combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA) technique in the study. The initial dose of ropivacaine is chosen as 12 mg in L2-3 group and 15 mg in L3-4 group, and the testing interval is 0.5 mg with subsequent doses being determined by the outcome of the previous injection in the same group. If the previous response is ineffective, the next patient will receive 0.5 mg more than the last patient. If the response of the previous patient is effective, the next patient decrease 0.5mg.
The visual analogue scale (VAS) is used to rate the pain, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. Criteria for evaluation:(1) effective: after spinal anesthesia finish, a dose that provide adequate sensory dermatomal anesthesia to pinprick to T6 or higher within 10 minutes, and the VAS is lower than or equal to 3 within 60minutes after skin incision; (2) ineffective: if the initial plane of sensory dermatomal anesthesia is lower than T6 or VAS is greater than 3 within 60 minutes after skin incision, the dose of ropivacaine is considered inadequate and additional lidocaine is given through epidural catheter.
Motor assessments are performed at the start of operation. Motor block in the lower limb is assessed by a modified Bromage scale (0=no paralysis, 1=unable to raise extended leg, 2=unable to flex knee,3=unable to flex ankle). All of the assessments are made by an anesthetist who is blinded to the group assignment as well as to the dose injected.
On the other hand, the investigators will compare the incidence of adverse reaction between the L2-3 and L3-4 group.
Using the Dixon and Massey up-and-down method study design, 60 patients scheduled for elective cesarean section will be included in the study, 30 for each group.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Shanghai
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 021
- Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Full term parturient(> 37 and <42 weeks gestation)
- Above 20 years and below 35 years
- American Society of Anesthetists(ASA) I to II
- Singleton pregnancy
- Elective cesarean section
- Body weight during 60-85kg, height during 150-170cm
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient refusal
- Hypertension
- Diabetes mellitus
- Heart diseases
- Asthma
- Abnormal fetus or placenta
- Contraindications to combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(CSEA)
- Allergy to ropivacaine
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: L2-3 intervertebral group
The initial dose of ropivacaine for subarachnoid is chosen as 12 mg in L2-3 intervertebral space group.
|
The initial dose of ropivacaine is chosen as 12 mg in L2-3 group and 15 mg in L3-4 group with the volume of 3 mL in both groups.
The testing interval is 0.5 mg with subsequent doses being determined by the outcome of the previous injection in the same group.If the previous response is ineffective, the next patient will receive 0.5 mg more than the last patient.
If the response of the previous patient is effective, the next patient decrease 0.5mg.
Other Names:
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: L3-4 intervertebral group
The initial dose of ropivacaine for subarachnoid is chosen as 15 mg in L3-4 group.
|
The initial dose of ropivacaine is chosen as 12 mg in L2-3 group and 15 mg in L3-4 group with the volume of 3 mL in both groups.
The testing interval is 0.5 mg with subsequent doses being determined by the outcome of the previous injection in the same group.If the previous response is ineffective, the next patient will receive 0.5 mg more than the last patient.
If the response of the previous patient is effective, the next patient decrease 0.5mg.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
sensory block assessment evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS) and sensory dermatomal anesthesia
Time Frame: during the entire procedure of operation
|
Sensory block assessment will be evaluated with VAS and sensory dermatomal anesthesia.
Criteria for evaluation of anesthetic efficacy:(1) effective: within 10 minutes after intrathecal injection, a dose that provides adequate sensory dermatomal anesthesia to pinprick to T6 or higher, and the VAS is lower than or equal to 3 within 60minutes after skin incision; (2) ineffective: the initial plane of sensory dermatomal anesthesia is lower than T6 or VAS is higher than 3 within 60 minutes after skin incision.
VAS is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires.
When responding to a VAS item, respondents specify their level of agreement to a statement by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points, where 0 was no pain and 10 was the worst.
A dermatome is an area of skin that is mainly supplied by a single spinal nerve.Usually the upper sensory dermatomal anesthesia is used to assess the effect of intrathecal anesthesia.
|
during the entire procedure of operation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
motor block accessment
Time Frame: 10minutes after the spinal anesthesia finished
|
Motor block in the lower limb will be assessed by a modified Bromage scale (0=no paralysis, 1=unable to raise extended leg, 2=unable to flex knee,3=unable to flex ankle) .
|
10minutes after the spinal anesthesia finished
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
incidence of adverse reaction
Time Frame: during the entire procedure of operation
|
The investigators will compare the incidence of adverse reaction between the L2-3 and L3-4 group such as maternal hypotension, bradycardia, respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting.
|
during the entire procedure of operation
|
|
effect of abdominal muscle relaxation
Time Frame: during the entire procedure of operation
|
The quality of abdominal muscle relaxation will be evaluated by the obstetrician as excellent (no disturbing muscle strain), satisfactory (disturbing, but acceptable) or unsatisfactory (unacceptable).
|
during the entire procedure of operation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2015-35-(1)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Anesthesia
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedSpinal Anesthesia | Success or Failure of Spinal AnesthesiaKorea, Republic of
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompleted
-
Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Institue of TraumaRecruitingSpinal Anesthesia Induced Hypotension | Geriatric Population | Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly PatientsPakistan
-
Universidade do Vale do SapucaiCompletedAnesthesia, Epidural | Anesthesia, Spinal | AntisepsisBrazil
-
San Salvatore Hospital of L'AquilaCompletedAnesthesia, Local | Anesthesia; Functional | Spinal CordItaly
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedSpinal Anesthesia Evaluation | Analgesic | Intrathecal AnesthesiaEgypt
-
Antalya Training and Research HospitalCompletedAnesthesia, General | Anesthesia, Spinal | Umbilical CordTurkey
-
University Tunis El ManarRecruitingSpinal AnesthesiaTunisia
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceNot yet recruiting
-
Tongji HospitalCompleted
Clinical Trials on Intervertebral space
-
Silver Cloud HealthCompletedDepression | Stress | AnxietyUnited States
-
Jordan University of Science and TechnologyCompletedOrthodontic ApplianceJordan
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityZimmer BiometCompletedSpinal Stenosis | Spondylolisthesis | Degenerative Lumbar Disc DiseaseCanada
-
St George's, University of LondonCompleted
-
Derek RichardsTerminatedDepression | Diabetes | Chronic Pain | Anxiety | COPD | CHD - Coronary Heart DiseaseUnited Kingdom
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalRecruitingAdolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisChina
-
Bahria UniversityRecruitingOrthodontic Space Closure | Gingival CleftPakistan
-
Silver Cloud HealthSumma Health SystemTerminatedDepressive Disorder | Depression | Anxiety DisordersUnited States
-
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore...RecruitingIntervertebral Disc Degeneration | Discogenic Pain | Discogenic DiseaseItaly
-
Silver Cloud HealthWithdrawnDepression | Stress | AnxietyIreland