Phase III Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of PXT3003 in CMT1A Patients (PLEO-CMT) (PLEO-CMT)

February 13, 2020 updated by: Pharnext SA

International, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study Assessing in Parallel Groups the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Doses of PXT3003 in Patients With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1A Treated 15 Months

The purpose of this study is to determine whether PXT3003 is effective and safe in the treatment of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease - Type 1 A (CMT1A). This double-blind study will assess in parallel groups 2 doses of PXT3003 compared to Placebo in CMT1A patients treated for 15 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PXT3003 is a fixed dose combination of (RS)-baclofen, naltrexone hydrochloride and D-sorbitol selected via a Systems Biology approach and developed by Pharnext, with the aim to limit the production of PMP22 and protect/improve axonal function in patients with CMT1A. On September 18th 2017, PXT3003 dose 2 was prematurely discontinued, due to an unexpected investigational medicinal product quality event (failed month 18 stability testing). This resulted in a large proportion of missing data that led us to reconsider the efficacy analysis that was initially planned in the protocol.The independent data safety monitoring committee did not identify any safety concern on September 5th 2017. All patients randomised to dose 2 were requested to undergo the end of study visit, and were offered to enter the extension study (CLN-PXT3003-03).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

323

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium
        • Departement of Neurology, UZ Leuven
      • Quebec, Canada, G1J 1Z4
        • University Hospital of Quebec
      • Lille, France
        • Centre de Référence des Maladies Neuromusculaires, Hôpital Swynghedauwl, CHU de Lille
      • Limoges, France
        • Centre de Référence des Neuropathies Périphériques Rares, Hôpital Dupuytren, CHU Limoges
      • Lyon, France
        • Service de Neurologie et du Sommeil, CHU Lyon Sud
      • Marseille, France
        • Centre de Référence des Maladies Neuromusculaires, Pôle des Neurosciences Clinique, CHU la Timone
      • Nantes, France
        • Centre de Référence des Maladies Neuromusculaires; Hôtel Dieu, CHU de Nantes
      • Paris, France
        • Service de Neurologie, Hopital Kremlin Bicetre
      • Aachen, Germany
        • Department of Neurology and Institute for Neuropathology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen
      • Göttingen, Germany
        • Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen
      • Munich, Germany
        • Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximillian University, Munich
      • Münster, Germany
        • Department for Sleep Medicine and Neuromuscular, University Hospital Münster
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Departement of Neurology, Academic Medical Center
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Department of neurology, Hospital Univesitario de Bellvitge
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario La Paz
      • Sevilla, Spain
        • Centro de Diagnostico y Tratamiento, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
      • Valencia, Spain
        • Servicio de Neurologia, Hospital Univesitari i Politécnic La Fe
    • Manchester
      • Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom, M6 8HD
        • Department of Neurology, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
    • Scotland
      • Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom, DD1 9SY
        • Ninewells Hospital and Medical School
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    • Connecticut
      • New Britain, Connecticut, United States, 06053
        • Hospital for Special Care, New Britain
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • Department of Neurology, McKnight Brain Institute
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • University of Kansas Medical Center
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109-5322
        • University of Michigan Health System
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63104-1027
        • Department of Neurology and Psichiatry, Saint Louis University
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Peripheral Neuropathy Center, Neurological Institue Building, Columbia University Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99202-1330
        • Saint Luke's Rehabilitation Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, aged from 16 to 65 years;
  • Patient with a proven genetic diagnosis of CMT1A;
  • Mild-to-moderate severity assessed by Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Score (version 2) with a score >2 and ≤18;
  • Muscle weakness in at least foot dorsiflexion;
  • Motor nerve conduction of the ulnar nerve of at least 15 m/sec;
  • Providing signed written informed consent to participate in the study and willing and able to comply with all study procedures and scheduled visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any other associated cause of peripheral neuropathy such as diabetes;
  • Patient with another significant neurological disease or a concomitant major systemic disease;
  • Clinically significant history of unstable medical illness since the last 30 days (unstable angina, cancer…) that may jeopardize the participation in the study;
  • Significant hematologic disease, hepatitis or liver failure, renal failure;
  • Limb surgery within six months before randomization or planned before trial completion;
  • Clinically significant abnormalities on the pre-study laboratory evaluation, physical evaluation, electrocardiogram (ECG);
  • Elevated ASAT/ALAT (> 3 x ULN) and elevated serum creatinine levels (> 1.25 x ULN);
  • History of recent alcohol or drug abuse or non-adherence with treatment or other experimental protocols;
  • Patient using unauthorized concomitant treatments including but not limited to baclofen, naltrexone, sorbitol (pharmaceutical form), opioids, levothyroxin and potentially neurotoxic drugs such as amiodarone, chloroquine, cancer drugs susceptible to induce a peripheral neuropathy. Patient who can/agrees to stop these medications 4 weeks before randomization and during the whole study duration can be included;
  • Female of childbearing potential (apart of patient using adequate contraceptive measures), pregnant or breast feeding;
  • Known hypersensitivity to any of the individual components of PXT3003;
  • Porphyria as it is a contra indication to baclofen, and it may also induce neuropathy;
  • Suspected inability to complete the study follow-up (foreign workers, transient visitors, tourists or any others for whom follow-up evaluation is not assured);
  • Limited mental capacity or psychiatric disease rendering the subject unable to provide written informed consent or comply with evaluation procedures;
  • Patient who has participated in another trial of investigational drug(s) within the past 30 days;
  • If a patient from the same family, living in the same household, has already been included in this study, it will not be possible to include another patient from the same family to avoid mixing of therapeutic units; therefore there would be a risk of inversion of the blind treatments which could jeopardize the interpretation of study results.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PXT3003 dose 1
Oral solution, 5 ml b.i.d. (taken morning and evening with food) during 15 months
Liquid oral solution, 5 ml twice a day, morning and evening with food
Other Names:
  • DOSE 1
Active Comparator: PXT3003 dose 2
Oral solution, 5 ml b.i.d. (taken morning and evening with food) during 15 months
Liquid oral solution, 5 ml twice a day, morning and evening with food
Other Names:
  • DOSE 2
Placebo Comparator: placebo
Oral solution, 5 ml b.i.d. (taken morning and evening with food) during 15 months
Liquid oral solution, 5 ml twice a day, morning and evening with food

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale (ONLS) Total Score
Time Frame: From Baseline to Month 15

The primary efficacy variable used in the main analysis is the mean of the available ONLS values at month 12 and month 15.

The ONLS is a disability scale that was derived and improved from the Overall Disability Sum Score (ODSS) to measure limitations in the everyday activities of the upper limbs (rated on 5 points) and the lower limbs (rated on 7 points). The total score is a 12-point scale: 0 (no disability) to 12 (maximum disability). Lower values in the ONLS indicate a better clinical condition.

Reported values are the values at Baseline (Base) and the average of the available values at Month 12 and Month 15 (Fin).

From Baseline to Month 15

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean of Ten Meter Walking Test (10MWT)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Month 15

This outcome measure is the mean of the available 10MWT values at month 12 and month 15.

The 10MWT is a simple to administer, standardized, reliable and valid evaluation of functional exercise capacity and gait that has been used to evaluate neurologic disorders and CMT patients.

Lower Time to Walk 10 Meters values indicate a better clinical condition.

Reported values are the values at Baseline (Base) and the average of the available values at Month 12 and Month 15 (Fin).

From Baseline to Month 15
Mean of the CMTNS-v2 Sensory Score
Time Frame: From Baseline to Month 15

This outcome measure is the mean of the available CMTNS-v2 Sensory Score values at month 12 and month 15.

The CMTNS-v2 is a specific scale designed to assess severity of impairment in CMT disease. It is a 36-point scale based on nine items to quantify impairment (sensory symptoms, pin sensibility, vibration and arm and leg strength), activity limitations (motor symptoms arms and legs) and electrophysiological function (amplitudes of ulnar CMAP and SNAP). The CMTNS-v2 goes from 0 (no impairment) to 36 (maximum impairment) whom each sub-items goes from 0 to 4.

The CMTNS-v2 Sensory score is summed of items 1+4+5 of CMTNS-v2 (Sensory symptoms, Pinprick sensibility and Vibration). It is a 12-point score: 0 (no impairment) to 12 (maximum impairment).

Lower CMTNS-v2 Sensory Score values indicate a better clinical condition.

Reported values are the values at Baseline (Base) and the average of the available values at Month 12 and Month 15 (Fin).

From Baseline to Month 15
Mean of the CMTNS-v2 Examination Score (CMTES-v2)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Month 15

This outcome measure is the mean of the available CMTNS-v2 Examination Score values at month 12 and month 15.

The CMTNS-v2 is a specific scale designed to assess severity of impairment in CMT disease. It is a 36-point scale based on nine items to quantify impairment (sensory symptoms, pin sensibility, vibration and arm and leg strength), activity limitations (motor symptoms arms and legs) and electrophysiological function (amplitudes of ulnar CMAP and SNAP). The CMTNS-v2 goes from 0 (no impairment) to 36 (maximum impairment) whom each sub-items goes from 0 to 4.

The CMTES-v2 is summed of item 1 to 7 of the CMTNS-v2 (limited to impairment items and excluding electrophysiological items). It is a 28-point score: 0 (no impairment) to 28 (maximum impairment).

Lower CMTES-v2 values indicate a better clinical condition.

Reported values are the values at Baseline (Base) and the average of the available values at Month 12 and Month 15 (Fin).

From Baseline to Month 15
Mean of the Results at the Nine-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT)
Time Frame: From Baseline to Month 15

This outcome measure is the mean of the available 9-HPT values at month 12 and month 15.

The Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) is a simple timed test of fine motor coordination of extremitied in the upper limbs. It measures the time needed by the patient to insert 9 pegs in nine holes and to remove them (normal required time 18 seconds).

Lower 9HPT values indicate a better clinical condition.

Reported values are the values at Baseline (Base) and the average of the available values at Month 12 and Month 15 (Fin).

From Baseline to Month 15
Number of Subjects With at Least One TEAE
Time Frame: The period between the patient signing the informed consent and 30 days after the end of study (i.e. completion/early discontinuation/last contact as recorded on the 'Study Completion on Early Termination' form up to 15 months)

Safety selection was to include all randomized patients that have received at least one dose of study treatment.

Safety and tolerability of PXT3003 were compared to placebo on the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); they were evaluated by type/nature, severity/intensity, seriousness, and relationship to study drug.

The period between the patient signing the informed consent and 30 days after the end of study (i.e. completion/early discontinuation/last contact as recorded on the 'Study Completion on Early Termination' form up to 15 months)
Incidence of AE Leading to Withdrawal of Study Drug
Time Frame: The period between the patient signing the informed consent and 30 days after the end of study (i.e. completion/early discontinuation/last contact as recorded on the 'Study Completion on Early Termination' form up to 15 months)
Safety and tolerability of PXT3003 were compared to placebo on the incidence of TEAEs leading to withdrawal of study drug.
The period between the patient signing the informed consent and 30 days after the end of study (i.e. completion/early discontinuation/last contact as recorded on the 'Study Completion on Early Termination' form up to 15 months)
Incidence of SAEs
Time Frame: The period between the patient signing the informed consent and 30 days after the end of study (i.e. completion/early discontinuation/last contact as recorded on the 'Study Completion on Early Termination' form up to 15 months).
Safety and tolerability of PXT3003 were compared to placebo on the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs).
The period between the patient signing the informed consent and 30 days after the end of study (i.e. completion/early discontinuation/last contact as recorded on the 'Study Completion on Early Termination' form up to 15 months).

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean of the CMTNS-v2 Sensory Symptoms
Time Frame: From Baseline to Month 15

This outcome measure is the mean of the available CMTNS-v2 Sensory Symptoms values at month 12 and month 15.

The CMTNS-v2 is a specific scale designed to assess severity of impairment in CMT disease. It is a 36-point scale based on nine items to quantify impairment (sensory symptoms, pin sensibility, vibration and arm and leg strength), activity limitations (motor symptoms arms and legs) and electrophysiological function (amplitudes of ulnar CMAP and SNAP). The CMTNS-v2 goes from 0 (no impairment) to 36 (maximum impairment) whom each sub-items goes from 0 to 4.

The CMTNS-v2 Sensory Symptoms is the first item of the CMTNS-v2. It is a 4-point score: 0 (no impairment) to 4 (maximum impairment).

Lower CMTNS-v2 Sensory Symptoms values indicate a better clinical condition.

Reported values are the values at Baseline (Base) and the average of the available values at Month 12 and Month 15 (Fin).

From Baseline to Month 15
Plasma Concentrations of Baclofen at Trough and at 90 Min After Drug Intake
Time Frame: At Month 12 and Month 15

Plasma concentration of PXT3003 components were measured at trough (prior to dose) and 90 minutes after drug intake.

The mean plasma values of the baseline correspond to half of the administered dose.

At Month 12 and Month 15
Plasma Concentrations of Naltrexone at Trough and at 90 Min After Drug Intake
Time Frame: At Month 12 and month 15

Plasma concentration of PXT3003 components were measured at trough (prior to dose) and 90 minutes after drug intake.

The mean plasma values of the baseline correspond to half of the administered dose.

At Month 12 and month 15
Plasma Concentrations of 6β-naltrexol at Trough and at 90 Min After Drug Intake
Time Frame: At Month 12 and Month 15

Plasma concentration of PXT3003 components were measured at trough (prior to dose) and peak (90 minutes post dose).

The mean plasma values of the baseline correspond to half of the administered dose.

At Month 12 and Month 15
Number of Participants With ONLS Therapy Response 1
Time Frame: From Baseline to Month 15
ONLS Therapy Response 1 was defined as the number of participants (responders) with an improvement on final ONLS Total Score of at least one point. A higher response rate indicate a better clinical condition.
From Baseline to Month 15
Number of Participants With ONLS Therapy Response 2
Time Frame: From Baseline to Month 15

ONLS Therapy Response 2 was defined as the number of participants with no deterioration (responders) on final ONLS Total Score.

A higher response rate indicates a better clinical condition.

From Baseline to Month 15

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shahram Attarian, MD, CHU la Timone, Marseille, France
  • Principal Investigator: Peter Young, MD, University Hospital Münster, Germany
  • Principal Investigator: Teresa Sevilla, MD, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
  • Principal Investigator: Marianne De Visser, MD, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
  • Principal Investigator: Philip Van Damme, MD, UZ Leuven, Belgium
  • Principal Investigator: Mark Roberts, MD, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  • Principal Investigator: Florian Thomas, MD, Saint-Louis University, Saint-Louis, USA
  • Principal Investigator: Jack Puymirat, MD, University Hospital of Quebec

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1A

Clinical Trials on PXT3003 dose 1

Subscribe