An Efficacy and Safety Study of Luspatercept (ACE-536) Versus Placebo in Adults Who Require Regular Red Blood Cell Transfusions Due to Beta (β) Thalassemia (BELIEVE)

March 23, 2023 updated by: Celgene

A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept (ACE-536) in Adults With Transfusion Dependent Beta (B)-Thalassemia

This is a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to determine the efficacy and safety of luspatercept (ACE-536) plus Best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC in adults who require regular red blood cell transfusion due to (β)-thalassemia.

The study is divided into the following periods:

  • Historical Period,
  • Screening/Run-in Period,
  • Double-blind Treatment Period (48 weeks),
  • Double-blind Long-term Treatment Period, (at the investigator's discretion an additional 48 weeks),
  • Open-Label Phase post unblinding and upon Data Monitoring Committee positive recommendation
  • Post-treatment Follow-up Period

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

336

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Camperdown, Australia, 2050
        • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
    • New South Wales
      • Randwick, New South Wales, Australia, 2031
        • Prince of Wales Hospital
    • Queensland
      • South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4101
        • Mater Hospital Brisbane
    • South Australia
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5000
        • Royal Adelaide Hospital Institute of Medical and Veterinary Science
    • Victoria
      • Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168
        • Monash Medical Centre
    • Western Australia
      • Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia, 6009
        • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
      • Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 4002
        • University Mulitiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Sveti Georgi EAD
      • Sofia, Bulgaria, 1756
        • Specialized Hospital for Active Treatment of Haematological Diseases - Sofia
      • Varna, Bulgaria, 9010
        • Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Sveta Marina EAD
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4
        • University Health Network
      • Creteil, France, 94010
        • Hôpital Henri Mondor
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • GH de Institut Catholique St. VincentHématologie
      • Marseille Cedex 9, France, 13385
        • Hopitaux de La Timone
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Hospital of Necker
      • Ampelokipi - Athens, Greece, 115 26
        • Laiko General Hospital of Athens
      • Ampelokipi - Athens, Greece, 115 26
        • Local Institution - 405
      • Athens, Greece, 115 27
        • General Children's Hospital "Agia Sophia"
      • Athens, Greece, 11527
        • General Hospital Georgios Gennimatas of Athens
      • Rio Patras, Greece, 26500
        • University General Hospital of Patras
      • Thessaloniki, Greece, 54642
        • Hippokration Hospital
      • Thessaloniki, Greece, 54642
        • Local Institution - 404
      • Beer Sheva, Israel, 84101
        • Soroka University Medical Centre
      • Haifa, Israel, 3109601
        • Rambam Health Corporation
      • Haïfa (Afula), Israel, 18101
        • Haemek Medical Center
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91120
        • Hadassah Medical Center
      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91031
        • Shaare Zedek Medical Center
      • Nahariya, Israel, 22100
        • Galilee Medical Center
      • Petah Tikva, Israel, 49100
        • Rabin Medical Center
      • Brindisi, Italy, 72100
        • Presidio Ospedaliero Antonio Perrino
      • Cagliari, Italy, 09121
        • Universita degli Studi di Cagliari - ASL8
      • Ferrara, Italy, 44124
        • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara - Arcispedale Sant'Anna
      • Genoa, Italy, 16128
        • Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera - Centro della Microcitemia e delle Anemie Congenite
      • Milan, Italy, 20122
        • Fondazione Ca Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore
      • Naples, Italy, 80131
        • Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli
      • Napoli, Italy, 80131
        • AORN A Cardarelli
      • Orbassano, Italy, 10043
        • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria S. Luigi Gonzaga
      • Palermo, Italy, 90146
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello
      • Verona, Italy, 37134
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona
      • Beirut, Lebanon
        • Chronic Care Center
      • Georgetown, Malaysia, 10990
        • Hospital Pulau Pinang c/o Penang Medical College
    • Johor
      • Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia, 80100
        • Hospital Sultanah Aminah
    • Kedah
      • Alor Setar, Kedah, Malaysia, 05460
        • Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah
    • Perak
      • Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia, 30990
        • Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun
    • Sabah
      • Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia, 88586
        • Queen Elizabeth Hospital
    • Sarawak
      • Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia, 93586
        • Hospital Umum Sarawak
    • Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur
      • Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 59100
        • University Malaya Medical Centre
      • Changhua City, Taiwan, 500
        • Changhua Christian Hospital
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 807
        • Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 40447
        • China Medical University Hospital
      • Taipei, Zhongzheng Dist., Taiwan, 10002
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
        • Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10330
        • Chulalongkorn University Faculty of Medicine - King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
      • Chiang Mai, Thailand, 50200
        • Chiang Mai University - Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital
      • Sousse, Tunisia, 4031
        • University Hospital Farhat Hached
      • Tunis, Tunisia, 1006
        • Bone Marrow Transplant Center
      • Tunis, Tunisia, 1008
        • Aziza Othmana Hospital
      • Tunis, Tunisia, 1089
        • Military Hospital of Tunis
      • Adana, Turkey, 01330
        • Cukurova University Medical Faculty Balcali Hospital
      • Adana, Turkey, 01130
        • Acibadem Adana Hospital
      • Adana, Turkey, 01330
        • Local Institution - 524
      • Ankara, Turkey, 01660
        • Hacettepe Universitesi
      • Antalya, Turkey, 07100
        • Antalya Egitim Arastirma
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34093
        • Istanbul Universitesi Istanbul Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi
      • Izmir, Turkey, 35100
        • Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi
      • Mersin, Turkey, 33343
        • Mersin University Medical Faculty
      • Leeds, United Kingdom, LS9 7TF
        • St James University Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom, N19 5NF
        • Whittington Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom, E1 1BB
        • Barts Health NHS Trust - The Royal London Hospital
      • London Bloomsbury, United Kingdom, WC1E 6AU
        • University College Hospital Trust
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9WL
        • Manchester Royal Infirmary
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
        • Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
      • Oakland, California, United States, 94609
        • Children's Hospital and Research Center at Oakland
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Ann and Robert H Lurie Childrens Hospital of Chicago
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Boston Children's Hospital
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Weill Cornell Medical College
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:

  1. Male or female, ≥18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent document (ICF).
  2. Subject must understand and voluntarily sign an Inform Consent Form prior to any study-related assessments/procedures being conducted.
  3. Subject is willing and able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
  4. Documented diagnosis of β-thalassemia or Hemoglobin E/β-thalassemia. (β-thalassemia with mutation and/or multiplication of alpha globin is allowed).
  5. Regularly transfused, defined as: 6-20 Red Blood Cell (RBC) units* in the 24 weeks prior to randomization and no transfusion-free period for ≥ 35 days during that period.

    * Sites who prescribe transfusions and have the transfusion records only in volumes should use for conversion of volume to units the below criteria, in order to obtain number of units within the last 24 weeks to assess the eligibility: 1 unit in this protocol refers to a quantity of packed RBCs approximately 200-350 mL. (i) sites who use transfusion bags within this range, or ≥ 350 mL, the conversion in units should be done by dividing the volume transfused to the patient by 350 mL, (ii) sites who use transfusion bags < 200 mL, the conversion in units should be done by dividing the volume transfused to the patient by 200 mL.

  6. Performance status: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0 or 1.
  7. A female of childbearing potential (FCBP) for this study is defined as a female who: 1) has achieved menarche at some point, 2) has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy or 3) has not been naturally postmenopausal (amenorrhea following cancer therapy does not rule out childbearing potential) for at least 24 consecutive months (ie, has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive months). FCBP participating in the study must:

    1. Have two negative pregnancy tests as verified by the Investigator prior to starting study therapy. She must agree to ongoing pregnancy testing during the course of the study, and after end of study treatment. This applies even if the subject practices true abstinence ** from heterosexual contact.
    2. Either commit to true abstinence** from heterosexual contact (which must be reviewed on a monthly basis and source documented) If a FCBP engages in sexual activity that may result in a pregnancy, she must agree to use, and be able to comply with, effective*** contraception without interruption, 28 days prior to starting investigational product, during the study therapy (including dose interruptions), and for 12 weeks (approximately five times the mean terminal half-life of luspatercept based on multiple-dose Pharmacokinetic PK) data) after discontinuation of study therapy.

      • True abstinence is acceptable when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. [Periodic abstinence (eg, calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.] *** Agreement to use highly effective methods of contraception that alone or in combination result in a failure rate of a Pearl index of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly throughout the course of the study.

    Such methods include: Combined (estrogen and progesterone/progestin containing) hormonal contraception: Oral; Intravaginal; Transdermal; Progestogen/progestin only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation: Oral; Injectable hormonal contraception; Implantable hormonal contraception; Placement of an intrauterine device (IUD); Placement of an intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS); Bilateral tubal occlusion; Vasectomized partner; Sexual Abstinence.

  8. Male subjects must:

    • Practice true abstinence or agree to use a condom during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a female of childbearing potential while participating in the study, during dose interruptions and for at least 12 weeks (approximately five times the mean terminal half-life of luspatercept based on multiple-dose PK data) following investigational product discontinuation, even if he has undergone a successful vasectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

The presence of any of the following will exclude a subject from enrollment:

  1. Any significant medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that would prevent the subject from participating in the study.
  2. Any condition including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study.
  3. Any condition that confounds the ability to interpret data from the study.
  4. A diagnosis of Hemoglobin S/β-thalassemia or alpha (α)-thalassemia (eg, Hemoglobin H);
  5. Evidence of active hepatitis C (HCV) infection as demonstrated by a positive HCV-RNA test of sufficient sensitivity, or active infectious hepatitis B as demonstrated by the presence of HBsAg and/or HBVDNA-positive,, or known positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

    Note: Subjects receiving antiviral therapies should have 2 negative HCVRNA tests 3 months apart.(ie, one test at the end of the antiviral therapy and a second test 3 months following the first test).

  6. Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) or stroke requiring medical intervention ≤ 24 weeks prior to randomization.
  7. Use of chronic anticoagulant therapy is excluded, unless the treatment stopped at least 28 days prior to randomization. Anticoagulant therapies used for prophylaxis for surgery or high risk procedures as well as low Molecular Weight (LMW) heparin for superficial venous thrombosis and chronic aspirin are allowed.
  8. Platelet count > 1000 x 109/L
  9. Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus within 24 weeks prior to randomization as defined by short term (eg, hyperosmolar or ketoacidotic crisis) and/or history of diabetic cardiovascular complications (eg, stroke or myocardial infarction).
  10. Treatment with another investigational drug or device ≤ 28 days prior to randomization.
  11. Prior exposure to sotatercept (ACE-011) or luspatercept (ACE-536).
  12. Use of an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) ≤ 24 weeks prior to randomization.
  13. Iron chelation therapy, if initiated ≤ 24 weeks prior to randomization (allowed if initiated > 24 weeks before or during treatment).
  14. Hydroxyurea treatment ≤ 24 weeks prior to randomization.
  15. Pregnant or lactating females.
  16. Uncontrolled hypertension. Controlled hypertension for this protocol is considered ≤ Grade 1 according to NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 (current active minor version).
  17. Major organ damage, including:

    1. Liver disease with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 3 x the upper limit of normal (ULN) or history of evidence of cirrhosis;
    2. Heart disease, heart failure as classified by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification 3 or higher, or significant arrhythmia requiring treatment, or recent myocardial infarction within 6 months of randomization.
    3. Lung disease, including pulmonary fibrosis or pulmonary hypertension which are clinically significant ie, ≥ Grade 3 NCI CTCAE version 4.0 (current active minor version).
    4. Creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min (per Cockroft-Gault formula).
  18. Proteinuria ≥ Grade 3 according to NCI CTCAE version 4.0 (current active minor version).
  19. Chronic systemic glucocorticoids ≤ 12 weeks prior to randomization (physiologic replacement therapy for adrenal insufficiency is allowed). Single day glucocorticoid treatment (eg, for prevention or treatment of transfusion reactions, is allowed).
  20. Major surgery ≤ 12 weeks prior to randomization (subjects must have completely recovered from any previous surgery prior to randomization).
  21. History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or hypersensitivity to recombinant proteins or excipients in the investigational product (see Investigator Brochure).
  22. Cytotoxic agents, immunosuppressants ≤ 28 days prior to randomization (ie, antithymocite globulin (ATG) or cyclosporine)
  23. History of malignancy with the exception of:

    1. Curatively resected nonmelanoma skin cancer.
    2. Curatively treated cervical carcinoma in situ.
    3. Other solid tumor with no known active disease in the opinion of the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo plus Best Supportive Care (BSC)
normal saline solution subcutaneous(ly) (SC) once every 21 days
Placebo, Subcutaneous, every 21 days.
Experimental: Luspatercept (ACE-536) plus Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Luspatercept, subcutaneous(ly) (SC) once every 21 days
Subjects will start with luspatercept at 1 mg/kg dose level.
Other Names:
  • ACE-536

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Erythroid Response - Week 13 to Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24
Erythroid Response was defined as red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden reduction from baseline ≥ 33% with a reduction of at least 2 units during Week 13 - 24 compared to the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1.
Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieved ≥ 33% Reduction From Baseline in Transfusion Burden - Week 37 to Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 37 to Week 48
Percentage of participants who achieved a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden reduction from baseline ≥ 33% with a reduction of at least 2 units during Weeks 37 - 48 compared to the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1.
Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 37 to Week 48
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in Transfusion Burden - Week 13 to Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24
Percentage of participants who achieved a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden reduction from baseline ≥ 50% with a reduction of at least 2 units during Weeks 13 - 24 compared to the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1.
Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24
Percentage Of Participants Who Achieve ≥ 50% Reduction From Baseline in Transfusion Burden - Week 37 to Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Week 37 to Week 48
Percentage of participants who achieved a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion burden reduction from baseline ≥ 50% with a reduction of at least 2 units during Week 37 to Week 48 compared to the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1.
Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Week 37 to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in Transfusion Burden - Week 13 to Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24
Baseline was defined as the total number of Red Blood Cells (RBC) units transfused during the 12-week interval on or prior to Dose 1 Day 1. This is compared to the total number of RBC units transfused during the 12-week interval from treatment weeks 13-24.
Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 13 to Week 24
Mean Change From Baseline In Liver Iron Concentration (LIC) At Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline: Week -12 to Day -1; Treatment: Week 48
Baseline was defined as the last value on or before the first dose of study drug was administered; if multiple values were present for the same date, the average of these values was used. If a participant had 1 postbaseline assessment, it was used as the Week 48 value. If a participant had multiple postbaseline assessments, the last one was used as the Week 48 value. The value of LIC was collected by magnetic resonance imaging. Participants with a LIC value > 43 mg/g were not included in the analysis.
Baseline: Week -12 to Day -1; Treatment: Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline In Mean Serum Ferritin At Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Week 37 to Week 48
For each participant, the baseline mean serum ferritin level was calculated during the 12 weeks prior to first study drug administration. The postbaseline mean serum ferritin level was calculated during the last 12 weeks of the 48-week double-blind Treatment Period or last 12 weeks of study treatment, if discontinued early. The change was calculated as the difference of post baseline mean serum ferritin level and baseline mean serum ferritin level.
Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Week 37 to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline In Total Hip And Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) At Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline: Day 1; Treatment: Week 48
For BMD, the lumbar spine and total hip were measured at baseline and 48 weeks by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Baseline was defined as the last value on or before the first dose of study drug is administered; if multiple values are present for the same date, the average of these values was used. If during the 48 week double-blinded treatment period, a participant has only one assessment, it is counted as 'Week 48' visit; if a participant has multiple assessments, the last one is used as 'Week 48' visit. The analysis was done on the population that had at least 2 measurements.
Baseline: Day 1; Treatment: Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline In Myocardial Iron At Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline: Day 1; Treatment: Week 48
Myocardial Iron levels were measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), using MRI parameter T2* (Unit: ms). T2* values correlates with heart failure (HF) risk (e.g. T2*<6ms: high HF risk).
Baseline: Day 1; Treatment: Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in the Transfusion-dependent Quality of Life (TranQol) Questionnaire At Week 24
Time Frame: Baseline: 4 weeks prior to Day 1; Treatment: Week 24
The TranQol is a self-administered quality of life tool developed for beta-thalassemia patients. The adult self-report version used in this study, includes 36 questions assessed on a 5-point response, that are grouped into 5 domains (Physical Health, Emotional Health, Sexual Health, Family Functioning, School/Career Functioning). Scores are calculated according to specific scoring algorithms developed by the authors. Both individual domains score and the total score range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Total Score and Physical Health domain score are reported. Positive change from baseline values indicate improvement.
Baseline: 4 weeks prior to Day 1; Treatment: Week 24
Percentage Of Participants Who Were Transfusion Independent For ≥ 8 Weeks During Treatment
Time Frame: From first dose through 3 weeks post last dose (up to approximately 218 weeks)
Transfusion independence was defined as the absence of any transfusion during any consecutive "rolling" 8-week time interval within the treatment period, i.e, Days 1 to 56, Days 2 to 57 and so on.
From first dose through 3 weeks post last dose (up to approximately 218 weeks)
Time to Erythroid Response
Time Frame: From first dose to 48 weeks following first dose
Time to erythroid response was defined as the time from first dose of the study drug to first erythroid response. This is reported for participants with a ≥ 33% reduction from baseline in RBC transfusion burden (with a reduction of at least 2 units) for any 12-week interval., as well as participants with a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in RBC transfusion burden (with a reduction of at least 2 units) for any 12-week interval.
From first dose to 48 weeks following first dose
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Apparent Clearance (CL/F)
Time Frame: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Apparent Volume of Distribution of the Central Compartment (V1/F)
Time Frame: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Elimination Half-life (t1/2)
Time Frame: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax)
Time Frame: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Maximum Concentration for the Starting Dose (Cmax)
Time Frame: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Maximum Concentration at Steady State for the Starting Dose (Cmax,ss)
Time Frame: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: Bayesian Estimate of Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve at Steady State for the Starting Dose (AUCss)
Time Frame: Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Blood serum samples taken pre-dose and on Days 1, 22, 64, 85, 106, 127, 169, 211, 253, 295, 337
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
Time Frame: From first dose to 90 days following last dose (up to approximately 52 months)
An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. A serious AE is any AE occurring at any dose that - Results in death - Is life-threatening - Requires or prolongs existing inpatient hospitalization - Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity - Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect - Constitutes an important medical event. The Investigator assessed the relationship of each AE to study drug and graded the severity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.03): - Grade 1 = Mild - Grade 2 = Moderate (some limitation in activity; no/minimal medical intervention) - Grade 3 = Severe (limitation in activity; medical intervention required) - Grade 4 = Life-threatening - Grade 5 = Death
From first dose to 90 days following last dose (up to approximately 52 months)
Participants With Pre-Existing and/or Treatment-Emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA)
Time Frame: Timeframe: pre-dose, Day 1, Days 22, 64, 106, 148, 232, 316
Number of participants with positive ADA prior to taking study drug and/or during study. A participant was counted as "treatment-emergent" if there was a positive post-baseline sample while the baseline sample was ADA negative, or there was a positive post-baseline sample with a titer ≥ 4-fold of the baseline titer while the baseline sample was ADA positive. A participant was counted as "preexisting" if the baseline sample was ADA positive and the participant was not qualified for "treatment-emergent."
Timeframe: pre-dose, Day 1, Days 22, 64, 106, 148, 232, 316
Mean Change From Baseline In Mean Daily Dose Of Iron Chelation Therapies (ICT) At Week 48
Time Frame: Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Week 37 to Week 48
Three different types of Iron Chelation Therapy (ICT) were analyzed: 1. Deferasirox 2. Deferiprone 3. Deferoxamine Mesilate/Deferoxamine The baseline mean daily dose was calculated using the ICT dosage during the 12 weeks prior to first study drug administration and the postbaseline mean daily dose was calculated during the last 12 weeks of the 48-week double-blind Treatment Period or the last 12 weeks of the study treatment for early discontinued participants.
Baseline: Day -83 to Day 1; Treatment: Week 37 to Week 48
Mean Change From Baseline in the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Questionnaire At Weeks 24
Time Frame: Baseline: 4 weeks prior to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 24
The SF-36 (version 2) is a generic, self-administered instrument consisting of 8 multi-item scales that assess 8 health domains. The raw score for each health domain is transformed into a 0 (worst) to 100 (best) domain score. The 0-100 scale score for each health domain is further converted to normbased scores using a T-score transformation, with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Higher norm-based T-scores indicate better heath/QoL. The domains/summaries reported are: 1. Physical Functioning (Range of possible T-scores is 19.26 - 57.54) 2. General Health (Range of possible T-scores is 18.95 - 66.50) 3. Physical Component summary (PCS) (Range of possible T-scores is 5.02 - 79.78). Positive change from baseline values indicate improvement.
Baseline: 4 weeks prior to Day 1; Treatment: Weeks 24
Number of Participants Who Utilized Healthcare Resources During Study
Time Frame: From informed consent signing (up to 12 weeks before start of treatment) to end of treatment (up to approximately 227 weeks)
Number of participants who had any of the following types of Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): - a doctor office visit (non-study scheduled) - an emergency department visit - a hospitalization
From informed consent signing (up to 12 weeks before start of treatment) to end of treatment (up to approximately 227 weeks)
Number of Days Spent in Higher Care Hospital Units
Time Frame: From informed consent signing (up to 12 weeks before start of treatment) to end of treatment (up to approximately 227 weeks)
Types of hospitals units considered to be 'higher care' are: - Intensive Care Unit - Coronary Care Unit
From informed consent signing (up to 12 weeks before start of treatment) to end of treatment (up to approximately 227 weeks)
Duration of Reduction in Transfusion Burden
Time Frame: From first dose to end of study treatment (up to approximately 215 weeks)
Responders were defined as subjects who achieved ≥ 33% reduction or ≥ 50% reduction in Red Blood Cells Transfusion (RBC-T) burden from baseline with a reduction of at least 2 RBC units during any rolling 12-week interval. The duration of reduction is calculated as Last Day of Response - First day of response +1
From first dose to end of study treatment (up to approximately 215 weeks)
Longest Duration of Transfusion Independence
Time Frame: From first dose through 3 weeks post last dose (up to approximately 218 weeks)
Transfusion independence was defined as the absence of any transfusion during any consecutive "rolling" 8-week time interval within the treatment period, ie, Days 1 to 56, Days 2 to 57 and so on. Longest duration of transfusion independence was estimated based on Kaplan-Meier model.
From first dose through 3 weeks post last dose (up to approximately 218 weeks)
Post-Baseline Transfusion Event Frequency
Time Frame: From first dose through 3 weeks post last dose (up to approximately 218 weeks)
The number of transfusion events after start of study treatment were evaluated. For the definition of transfusion events, if multiple transfusions happen on the same date, they are counted as one event; if multiple transfusions happen on two consecutive dates, they are counted as one event; if multiple transfusions happen on three consecutive dates, they are counted as two events. Results are presented in 24-week intervals, up to 96 weeks after start of study treatment
From first dose through 3 weeks post last dose (up to approximately 218 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Beta-Thalassemia

Clinical Trials on Luspatercept

3
Subscribe