Peri-sphincter Injection of Autologous Myofibres to Treat of Urinary Incontinence by Sphincter Deficiency (IPSMA)

Stress urinary incontinence related to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) is a severe form of incontinence that may have a major impact on the quality of life. The main treatment is surgical and consists in the implantation of medical devices such as the artificial urinary sphincter, adjustable continence therapy, compressive sling, or injection of bulking agent.

The investigator has developed a new therapeutic strategy for ISD that consist to implant myofibers with their attached satellite cells (the main source of muscle progenitor cells) at the vicinity of the striated urethral sphincter. The principle of this method relies on the in vivo activation of satellite cells leading to the formation of regenerated myofibers (myotubes) generating a distinct and tonic muscular activity . The proof of concept was investigated in a Phase I clinical trial: Investigator found that the periurethral implantation of myofiber strips around the urethra generated an electromyographic activity improving urethral closure pressure in women with severe urinary incontinence associated to ISD. In this previous study, the technique of myofiber implantation was invasive, as it required a surgical approach and dissection of the urethra to place the myofiber. For the clinical trial IPSMA, the investigator sought to optimize the myofiber transplantation process using a method injection of myofibers core obtained by hydro-dissection. The injection technique is performed percutaneously under fluoroscopic and endoscopic control and does not require a surgical approach of the urethra.

This clinical trial is prospective, open-label, non-randomized, uncontrolled, single-center for the first stage and multicenter for the second stage, of 13 months for each patient aims to assess the efficacy and safety of IPSMA in the treatment of urinary incontinence in women with ISD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigator chose an assessment method in 2 stages according to the Simon plane . A total of 38 patients are needed. Assuming a ratio of 10% of lost patients or for which the primary endpoint was not evaluable, 4 additional patients will be included totaling 42 patients will be included.

This trial is single-center for the first stage and multicenter for the second stage.

11 patients will be included in the first stage and 31 patients in the second stage.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Creteil, France, 94010
        • Henri Mondor Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female.
  • Age> or = 18 years.
  • Patients with stress urinary incontinence by ISD for at least 6 months Failure of Pelvic floor muscle training (at least 20 sessions).
  • Fixed urethra : a negative Ulmsten test / Qtip test <30 °
  • 24h Pad test >50 g
  • Urodynamic criteria: LPP (leak points pressure) <100 cm H20 and MUCP <50 cm H2O replaced by Urodynamic criteria: MUCP <50 cm H2O (amendment n°3)
  • Collection of informed written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not affiliated to a social security scheme
  • Trouble hemostasis known
  • Untreated urinary tract infection
  • Muscle disease genetically determined or acquired
  • Patients with urinary incontinence by vesica-urethral hypermobility
  • Incomplete bladder emptying: post void residual> 20% of the volume voided during urination> 150cc
  • Maximum urinary flow rate <12 ml / sec replaced by maximum urinary flow rate <12 ml / sec for volume urinated during urination > 150cc (amendment n°3)
  • overactive bladder
  • Bladder capacity (B3) <200 cc (deleted in amendment n°3)
  • Urethral stricture
  • Anticoagulant therapy that cannot be replaced by a low molecular weight heparin
  • Pregnant or intend to become pregnant during the study period or breastfeeding informed by the patient during the consultation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: IPSMA
Injection Peri Sphincter Myofibers Autologous

The first step of the procedure consists to harvest a muscle fragment from the lower part of the rectus abdominis muscle of the abdomen approached by a short incision. Injectable myofiber cores will be prepared by hydrodissection of the muscle biopsy.

All myofibers cores will be suspended in autologous serum prepared by centrifugation before the incision.

During the second step of the procedure, the myofibers will be injected percutaneously into the peri-sphincter region under endoscopic and radiographic control.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Step 1: Tolerance
Time Frame: One year after treatment
- Tolerance: Serious adverse events grade 3 or more related to the procedure according to Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB)
One year after treatment
Step 1 and 2: Rate of patients responder at M12 after surgery
Time Frame: One year after treatment
Efficiency: Response is defined by an improvement in 24h pad weight as greater than 50% reduction from baseline and improvement in the number of incontinence episodes per day as greater than 50% reduction from baseline
One year after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occurrence of serious and non-serious adverse events
Time Frame: One year after treatment
One year after treatment
Proportion of patients cured at M12. patients are considered as cured if: - The absence of pad use, a 24h pad test <2g AND - The absence of urinary leakage reported in the voiding diary (3 consecutive days).
Time Frame: One year after treatment
One year after treatment
Improvement of quality of life
Time Frame: One year after treatment
One year after treatment
Response times
Time Frame: One year after treatment
One year after treatment
Urodynamic evaluation
Time Frame: One year after treatment
Leak Point Pressure (LPP), maximal urethral closure pressure (MUCP), area under the curve (profilometry), electromyogram (EMG) gives urodynamic evaluation
One year after treatment
Number of re-intervention required (conventional treatment after 6 months) to treat persistent urinary incontinence after IPSMA
Time Frame: 6 months after treatment
6 months after treatment
Patients with a reduction in the 24h pad test <50% at one year will be considered failure.
Time Frame: One year after treatment
One year after treatment
Direct global cost of IPSMA surgery
Time Frame: One year after treatment
One year after treatment
Healing times
Time Frame: One year after treatment

Defined by :

  • The absence of pad use, a 24h pad test <2g AND
  • The absence of urinary leakage reported in the voiding diary (3 consecutive days).
One year after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: René YIOU, MD, PhD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 6, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 6, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 17, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

DATAS ARE OWNED BY ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE - HOPITAUX DE PARIS, PLEASE CONTACT SPONSOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence by Intrinsic Sphincter Deficiency

Clinical Trials on Peri sphincter injection Autologous myofibers

Subscribe