Perception of Cohesion Within a Relationship (Dyadic Adjustment) on the Quality of Life of Patients With Prostate Cancer With Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone. (EQUINOXE)

May 11, 2023 updated by: Ipsen

Impact of the Perception of Cohesion Within a Relationship (Dyadic Adjustment) on the Quality of Life of Patients With Prostate Cancer With Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist Therapy Initiated by the Urologist in the Routine Practice. Evaluation by the Patient and the Partner.

The general hypothesis put forward in this study is that the degree of cohesion (agreement) in the relationship, or dyadic adjustment affects a patient's quality of life and clinical course during the first few critical months following diagnosis and the introduction of treatment. The level of cohesion in the relationship is certainly not the only parameter associated with changes in the quality of life. Other factors must also be investigated such as level of education, circumstances surrounding the diagnosis (new diagnosis or relapse), management (single therapy or adjuvant therapy), the level of physical activity, the patient's age and the presence of functional disorders, etc.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France
        • Ipsen Central Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Prostate cancer patients and their partners recruited by urologists.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient presenting with histologically confirmed prostate cancer.
  • Patient eligible to start GnRH agonist therapy, either as monotherapy or adjuvant therapy, and for whom one of these treatments was selected voluntarily by the urologist, prior to the start of the study.
  • Patient currently living with the same partner for at least 6 months.
  • Patient and partner capable of reading, understanding and returning an evaluation self-questionnaire 6 months after the initial consultation.
  • Patient giving its written consent to participate to the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The subject is participating in another clinical trial.
  • Patient who has received a GnRH agonist therapy during the last 2 years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Prostate cancer patients
This is a non-interventional study. Thus, investigators are free to choose GnRH agonist therapy product, and modalities of administration in accordance with local Summary of Product Characteristics.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in quality of life of the patient.
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Assessment of the dyadic adjustment and its impact on the quality of life of the patient through self-questionnaire by the patient and the partner
Baseline and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of representations of illness
Time Frame: Baseline
Self-questionnaire by the patient and the partner
Baseline
Correlations between quality of life specific to prostate cancer, general quality of life and dyadic adjustment.
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-questionnaire by the patient only
6 months
Proportion of couples with a consistency or inconsistency level of dyadic adjustment
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Investigation of factors associated with patient's perception of dyadic adjustment on changes quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Self-questionnaire by the patient and the partner
Baseline and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ipsen Medical Director, Ipsen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 15, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) agonist therapy

Subscribe